当人际目标冲突导致一般团队冲突：一个考虑人际紧张作为中介的实验。

IF 3.3 2区心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

Psychology of Sport and Exercise Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102901

Jonas Lüdemann , Fabian Pels , Martin Boss , Jens Kleinert

{"title":"当人际目标冲突导致一般团队冲突：一个考虑人际紧张作为中介的实验。","authors":"Jonas Lüdemann , Fabian Pels , Martin Boss , Jens Kleinert","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interpersonal goal conflict occurs when at least one team member has a goal that interferes with the achievement of other team members' goals. Such interpersonal goal conflict has an impact on a variety of team outcomes (e.g., team performance, well-being) and may theoretically lead to general team conflict, although the latter has not yet been empirically investigated. Hence, the primary aim of this study is to examine whether interpersonal goal conflict has an impact on general team conflict. In addition, a secondary aim is to examine whether intrapersonal tension may be a mediator of this relationship. Increased intrapersonal tension (including negative emotions) may be a necessary condition for interpersonal goal conflict to lead to general team conflict. A between-subject experiment with three conditions was conducted. In all conditions, participants (<em>N</em> = 80 male sports science students; <em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 22.64 years, <em>SD</em> = 2.72) performed in a team of three (including a confederate). The team goal was to perform an interactive task on a bicycle ergometer. Interpersonal goal conflicts were induced by threatening the achievement of the team goal through additive deviant individual goal-behavior constellations in the experimental conditions. Perceived intrapersonal tension (mediator) and perceived general team conflict (dependent variable) were measured after the task. An ANOVA showed that general team conflict was higher in the experimental condition with an additional deviant behavior (DB) than in the control condition (CC) and the experimental condition with an additional deviant goal without deviant behavior (DG); there were no significant differences between CC and DG. A mediation analysis showed that the relationship between goal incompatibility and general team conflict, partly mediated via intrapersonal tension, was stronger in DB than in DG. The experiment with young adult males provides evidence that interpersonal goal conflict behavior (and not just the existence of a deviant goal) leads to general team conflict, which is partly explained by intrapersonal tension among team members.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102901"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When interpersonal goal conflict results in general team conflict: An experiment considering intrapersonal tension as a mediator\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Lüdemann , Fabian Pels , Martin Boss , Jens Kleinert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Interpersonal goal conflict occurs when at least one team member has a goal that interferes with the achievement of other team members' goals. Such interpersonal goal conflict has an impact on a variety of team outcomes (e.g., team performance, well-being) and may theoretically lead to general team conflict, although the latter has not yet been empirically investigated. Hence, the primary aim of this study is to examine whether interpersonal goal conflict has an impact on general team conflict. In addition, a secondary aim is to examine whether intrapersonal tension may be a mediator of this relationship. Increased intrapersonal tension (including negative emotions) may be a necessary condition for interpersonal goal conflict to lead to general team conflict. A between-subject experiment with three conditions was conducted. In all conditions, participants (<em>N</em> = 80 male sports science students; <em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 22.64 years, <em>SD</em> = 2.72) performed in a team of three (including a confederate). The team goal was to perform an interactive task on a bicycle ergometer. Interpersonal goal conflicts were induced by threatening the achievement of the team goal through additive deviant individual goal-behavior constellations in the experimental conditions. Perceived intrapersonal tension (mediator) and perceived general team conflict (dependent variable) were measured after the task. An ANOVA showed that general team conflict was higher in the experimental condition with an additional deviant behavior (DB) than in the control condition (CC) and the experimental condition with an additional deviant goal without deviant behavior (DG); there were no significant differences between CC and DG. A mediation analysis showed that the relationship between goal incompatibility and general team conflict, partly mediated via intrapersonal tension, was stronger in DB than in DG. The experiment with young adult males provides evidence that interpersonal goal conflict behavior (and not just the existence of a deviant goal) leads to general team conflict, which is partly explained by intrapersonal tension among team members.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102901\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

当至少有一个团队成员的目标干扰了其他团队成员目标的实现时，就会发生人际目标冲突。这种人际目标冲突对各种团队结果（如团队绩效、幸福感）都有影响，理论上可能导致一般的团队冲突，尽管后者尚未得到实证调查。因此，本研究的主要目的是考察人际目标冲突是否会对整体团队冲突产生影响。此外，第二个目的是研究人际紧张是否可能是这种关系的中介。人际关系紧张（包括负面情绪）的增加可能是人际目标冲突导致整体团队冲突的必要条件。进行了三种情况下的受试者间实验。在所有条件下，参与者(N = 80名男性体育科学系学生；法师= 22.64岁，SD = 2.72)在三人小组（包括一个同伙）中执行任务。团队的目标是在自行车测力仪上执行一个交互式任务。在实验条件下，通过累加性的个体偏差目标-行为组合来威胁团队目标的实现，从而诱发人际目标冲突。在任务结束后测量感知到的人际紧张（中介变量）和感知到的一般团队冲突（因变量）。方差分析显示，在有额外偏差行为（DB）的实验条件下，一般团队冲突高于对照组（CC）和无偏差行为（DG）的实验条件；CC和DG之间无显著差异。一项中介分析显示，目标不相容与一般团队冲突之间的关系，在个人紧张的部分中介作用下，DB组强于DG组。以年轻成年男性为对象的实验提供了证据，证明人际目标冲突行为（而不仅仅是偏差目标的存在）会导致普遍的团队冲突，这在一定程度上可以通过团队成员之间的人际关系紧张来解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

When interpersonal goal conflict results in general team conflict: An experiment considering intrapersonal tension as a mediator

Interpersonal goal conflict occurs when at least one team member has a goal that interferes with the achievement of other team members' goals. Such interpersonal goal conflict has an impact on a variety of team outcomes (e.g., team performance, well-being) and may theoretically lead to general team conflict, although the latter has not yet been empirically investigated. Hence, the primary aim of this study is to examine whether interpersonal goal conflict has an impact on general team conflict. In addition, a secondary aim is to examine whether intrapersonal tension may be a mediator of this relationship. Increased intrapersonal tension (including negative emotions) may be a necessary condition for interpersonal goal conflict to lead to general team conflict. A between-subject experiment with three conditions was conducted. In all conditions, participants (N = 80 male sports science students; M_age = 22.64 years, SD = 2.72) performed in a team of three (including a confederate). The team goal was to perform an interactive task on a bicycle ergometer. Interpersonal goal conflicts were induced by threatening the achievement of the team goal through additive deviant individual goal-behavior constellations in the experimental conditions. Perceived intrapersonal tension (mediator) and perceived general team conflict (dependent variable) were measured after the task. An ANOVA showed that general team conflict was higher in the experimental condition with an additional deviant behavior (DB) than in the control condition (CC) and the experimental condition with an additional deviant goal without deviant behavior (DG); there were no significant differences between CC and DG. A mediation analysis showed that the relationship between goal incompatibility and general team conflict, partly mediated via intrapersonal tension, was stronger in DB than in DG. The experiment with young adult males provides evidence that interpersonal goal conflict behavior (and not just the existence of a deviant goal) leads to general team conflict, which is partly explained by intrapersonal tension among team members.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psychology of Sport and Exercise 医学-心理学

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

172

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.