第一跖骨前旋是否可以通过跖骨-籽骨复位来纠正?

Paulo Carvalho, Holly Johnson, Ricardo Villar, Martim Pinto, Pedro Diniz, Miki Dalmau-Pastor
{"title":"第一跖骨前旋是否可以通过跖骨-籽骨复位来纠正?","authors":"Paulo Carvalho, Holly Johnson, Ricardo Villar, Martim Pinto, Pedro Diniz, Miki Dalmau-Pastor","doi":"10.1177/19386400251340139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn the past few years, great importance has been given to coronal plane deformity and to pronation of the first metatarsal (M1) in hallux valgus. We believe that tensioning of the medial metatarsal-sesamoid ligament (MMSL) as a consequence of M1 medial displacement in relation to the sesamoids might be the main cause of M1 pronation. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate if M1 pronation is corrected after an adequate M1 head reduction over the sesamoids, using the Minimally Invasive Chevron-Akin (MICA) technique.Material and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive patients with symptomatic hallux valgus deformity, who underwent surgical treatment with the MICA technique between November 2021 and July 2022. Patients' radiographic weight-bearing images were retrospectively evaluated for pre- and postoperative pronation and metatarsal-sesamoid relative positioning. M1 pronation was assessed and classified as described by Okuda et al. Pronation was considered to exist in types R and I, ie, every time there was not an angular shape of the M1 head. Satisfactory sesamoid reduction was considered when the lateral sesamoid was, at least, 50% covered by the metatarsal.ResultsNinety-one feet (67 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of surgery was 57.9 years. Most patients underwent unilateral surgery [right foot, 24 (35.8%); left foot, 19 (28.4%)] with 24 patients (35.8%) undergoing bilateral surgery. Eighty-four feet (92.3%) had preoperative pronation. Among these, 54 feet (64.3%) had satisfactory positioning of the head over the sesamoids postoperatively and 30 feet (35.7%) did not. Of the 54 feet with satisfactory positioning, 51 (94.4%) did not show postoperative metatarsal pronation, while 3 (5.6%) did (P < .0001). Of the 30 feet with unsatisfactory reduction of the M1 head, 28 (93.3%) had postoperative pronation and 2 (6.7%) had no pronation (P < .0001).ConclusionAccording to our study, first metatarsal pronation is predominantly self-corrected when a satisfactory reduction of the head of M1 over the sesamoids is achieved, using the MICA technique. We hypothesize that pronation might be due to MMSL tensioning however further basic science and clinical studies using weight-bearing computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation are needed to confirm our findings.Level of Evidence:Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400251340139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does First Metatarsal Pronation Correct Itself With Metatarsal-Sesamoid Reduction?\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Carvalho, Holly Johnson, Ricardo Villar, Martim Pinto, Pedro Diniz, Miki Dalmau-Pastor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19386400251340139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundIn the past few years, great importance has been given to coronal plane deformity and to pronation of the first metatarsal (M1) in hallux valgus. We believe that tensioning of the medial metatarsal-sesamoid ligament (MMSL) as a consequence of M1 medial displacement in relation to the sesamoids might be the main cause of M1 pronation. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate if M1 pronation is corrected after an adequate M1 head reduction over the sesamoids, using the Minimally Invasive Chevron-Akin (MICA) technique.Material and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive patients with symptomatic hallux valgus deformity, who underwent surgical treatment with the MICA technique between November 2021 and July 2022. Patients' radiographic weight-bearing images were retrospectively evaluated for pre- and postoperative pronation and metatarsal-sesamoid relative positioning. M1 pronation was assessed and classified as described by Okuda et al. Pronation was considered to exist in types R and I, ie, every time there was not an angular shape of the M1 head. Satisfactory sesamoid reduction was considered when the lateral sesamoid was, at least, 50% covered by the metatarsal.ResultsNinety-one feet (67 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of surgery was 57.9 years. Most patients underwent unilateral surgery [right foot, 24 (35.8%); left foot, 19 (28.4%)] with 24 patients (35.8%) undergoing bilateral surgery. Eighty-four feet (92.3%) had preoperative pronation. Among these, 54 feet (64.3%) had satisfactory positioning of the head over the sesamoids postoperatively and 30 feet (35.7%) did not. Of the 54 feet with satisfactory positioning, 51 (94.4%) did not show postoperative metatarsal pronation, while 3 (5.6%) did (P < .0001). Of the 30 feet with unsatisfactory reduction of the M1 head, 28 (93.3%) had postoperative pronation and 2 (6.7%) had no pronation (P < .0001).ConclusionAccording to our study, first metatarsal pronation is predominantly self-corrected when a satisfactory reduction of the head of M1 over the sesamoids is achieved, using the MICA technique. We hypothesize that pronation might be due to MMSL tensioning however further basic science and clinical studies using weight-bearing computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation are needed to confirm our findings.Level of Evidence:Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19386400251340139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251340139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251340139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在过去的几年里,冠状面畸形和第一跖骨内旋(M1)在拇外翻中得到了很大的重视。我们认为,内侧跖骨-籽状韧带(MMSL)因M1内侧相对于籽状韧带的移位而产生的张力可能是M1旋前的主要原因。本研究旨在回顾性评估使用微创Chevron-Akin (MICA)技术在籽状体上进行足够的M1头复位后M1旋前是否得到纠正。材料和方法我们回顾性分析了一系列连续的有症状的拇外翻畸形患者,这些患者在2021年11月至2022年7月期间接受了MICA技术的手术治疗。回顾性评估患者术前和术后的x线负重图像,以及跖骨-籽骨相对定位。按照Okuda等人的描述对M1旋前进行评估和分类。旋前被认为存在于R型和I型中,即每次M1头没有一个有棱角的形状。当外侧籽骨至少有50%被跖骨覆盖时,就认为是满意的籽骨复位。结果91脚(67例)符合纳入标准。手术时平均年龄57.9岁。大多数患者行单侧手术[右足24例(35.8%);左足19例(28.4%),双侧手术24例(35.8%)。84只脚(92.3%)术前内旋。其中,54英尺(64.3%)术后头部在籽状体上的定位令人满意,30英尺(35.7%)没有。在54只定位满意的脚中,51只(94.4%)未出现术后跖前旋,3只(5.6%)出现术后跖前旋(P < 0.0001)。在M1头复位不理想的30只脚中,28只(93.3%)发生了术后旋前,2只(6.7%)没有发生旋前(P < 0.0001)。结论:根据我们的研究,当使用MICA技术实现M1头在籽状骨上的满意复位时,第一跖骨前旋主要是自我矫正的。我们假设前旋可能是由于MMSL张力引起的,但需要进一步的基础科学和临床研究,包括负重计算机断层扫描和生物力学评估来证实我们的发现。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does First Metatarsal Pronation Correct Itself With Metatarsal-Sesamoid Reduction?

BackgroundIn the past few years, great importance has been given to coronal plane deformity and to pronation of the first metatarsal (M1) in hallux valgus. We believe that tensioning of the medial metatarsal-sesamoid ligament (MMSL) as a consequence of M1 medial displacement in relation to the sesamoids might be the main cause of M1 pronation. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate if M1 pronation is corrected after an adequate M1 head reduction over the sesamoids, using the Minimally Invasive Chevron-Akin (MICA) technique.Material and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive patients with symptomatic hallux valgus deformity, who underwent surgical treatment with the MICA technique between November 2021 and July 2022. Patients' radiographic weight-bearing images were retrospectively evaluated for pre- and postoperative pronation and metatarsal-sesamoid relative positioning. M1 pronation was assessed and classified as described by Okuda et al. Pronation was considered to exist in types R and I, ie, every time there was not an angular shape of the M1 head. Satisfactory sesamoid reduction was considered when the lateral sesamoid was, at least, 50% covered by the metatarsal.ResultsNinety-one feet (67 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of surgery was 57.9 years. Most patients underwent unilateral surgery [right foot, 24 (35.8%); left foot, 19 (28.4%)] with 24 patients (35.8%) undergoing bilateral surgery. Eighty-four feet (92.3%) had preoperative pronation. Among these, 54 feet (64.3%) had satisfactory positioning of the head over the sesamoids postoperatively and 30 feet (35.7%) did not. Of the 54 feet with satisfactory positioning, 51 (94.4%) did not show postoperative metatarsal pronation, while 3 (5.6%) did (P < .0001). Of the 30 feet with unsatisfactory reduction of the M1 head, 28 (93.3%) had postoperative pronation and 2 (6.7%) had no pronation (P < .0001).ConclusionAccording to our study, first metatarsal pronation is predominantly self-corrected when a satisfactory reduction of the head of M1 over the sesamoids is achieved, using the MICA technique. We hypothesize that pronation might be due to MMSL tensioning however further basic science and clinical studies using weight-bearing computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation are needed to confirm our findings.Level of Evidence:Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信