{"title":"了解老年痴呆症养老院居民的癌症护理:一项民族志研究。","authors":"Olivia Claire Robinson, Claire Surr, Laura Ashley","doi":"10.1002/pon.70184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the United Kingdom (UK), 1 in 13 people living with dementia also have cancer. At some point, 41.3% of this population group will require care home support. Limited research has examined the care and support needs of people with dementia and comorbid cancer (DCC) in nursing homes (NHs). This study aimed to explore the care experiences of NH residents with DCC, their families, nursing home staff (NHS) and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to identify challenges and good practices, to develop recommendations for practice improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focussed ethnography using interviews, observations, informal conversations, and review of care plan documentation. Data were analysed using ethnographically informed reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight HCPs, Six NHS, 5 family caregivers and 7 residents with DCC were recruited from five NHs in Northern England. Two themes were developed: Complexities around cancer referral and treatment decision-making and Relative invisibility of a resident's clinical cancer diagnosis. Findings suggested residents with DCC were not included in best interest decision-making due to the potential distress knowing about a cancer diagnosis would cause. Families, HCPs and NH staff made collective decisions on the behalf of residents. Often cancer referral was deemed not appropriate. Thus, people with dementia had a clinical-only cancer diagnosis, resulting in limited formal information about the cancer in care documentation and staff knowledge. Potential consequences of having a clinical-only cancer diagnosis included: misattributing cancer symptoms to dementia, reactive care responses to cancer symptoms and the possibility of inadequately managed cancer symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing earlier discussions about feasible care outcomes is crucial. These conversations should include considerations around hospital referral for oncology care or care through palliation in the NH. Without appropriate recognition of a clinical-only cancer diagnosis and support for staff it could lead to advancement of symptoms that might be challenging and less well managed. We outline several recommendations to support NHS to deliver person-centred care to residents with DCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 6","pages":"e70184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Cancer Care for Nursing Home Residents Living With Dementia: An Ethnographic Study.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Claire Robinson, Claire Surr, Laura Ashley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the United Kingdom (UK), 1 in 13 people living with dementia also have cancer. At some point, 41.3% of this population group will require care home support. Limited research has examined the care and support needs of people with dementia and comorbid cancer (DCC) in nursing homes (NHs). This study aimed to explore the care experiences of NH residents with DCC, their families, nursing home staff (NHS) and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to identify challenges and good practices, to develop recommendations for practice improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focussed ethnography using interviews, observations, informal conversations, and review of care plan documentation. Data were analysed using ethnographically informed reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight HCPs, Six NHS, 5 family caregivers and 7 residents with DCC were recruited from five NHs in Northern England. Two themes were developed: Complexities around cancer referral and treatment decision-making and Relative invisibility of a resident's clinical cancer diagnosis. Findings suggested residents with DCC were not included in best interest decision-making due to the potential distress knowing about a cancer diagnosis would cause. Families, HCPs and NH staff made collective decisions on the behalf of residents. Often cancer referral was deemed not appropriate. Thus, people with dementia had a clinical-only cancer diagnosis, resulting in limited formal information about the cancer in care documentation and staff knowledge. Potential consequences of having a clinical-only cancer diagnosis included: misattributing cancer symptoms to dementia, reactive care responses to cancer symptoms and the possibility of inadequately managed cancer symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing earlier discussions about feasible care outcomes is crucial. These conversations should include considerations around hospital referral for oncology care or care through palliation in the NH. Without appropriate recognition of a clinical-only cancer diagnosis and support for staff it could lead to advancement of symptoms that might be challenging and less well managed. We outline several recommendations to support NHS to deliver person-centred care to residents with DCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"e70184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126173/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Cancer Care for Nursing Home Residents Living With Dementia: An Ethnographic Study.
Objective: In the United Kingdom (UK), 1 in 13 people living with dementia also have cancer. At some point, 41.3% of this population group will require care home support. Limited research has examined the care and support needs of people with dementia and comorbid cancer (DCC) in nursing homes (NHs). This study aimed to explore the care experiences of NH residents with DCC, their families, nursing home staff (NHS) and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to identify challenges and good practices, to develop recommendations for practice improvement.
Methods: A focussed ethnography using interviews, observations, informal conversations, and review of care plan documentation. Data were analysed using ethnographically informed reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: Eight HCPs, Six NHS, 5 family caregivers and 7 residents with DCC were recruited from five NHs in Northern England. Two themes were developed: Complexities around cancer referral and treatment decision-making and Relative invisibility of a resident's clinical cancer diagnosis. Findings suggested residents with DCC were not included in best interest decision-making due to the potential distress knowing about a cancer diagnosis would cause. Families, HCPs and NH staff made collective decisions on the behalf of residents. Often cancer referral was deemed not appropriate. Thus, people with dementia had a clinical-only cancer diagnosis, resulting in limited formal information about the cancer in care documentation and staff knowledge. Potential consequences of having a clinical-only cancer diagnosis included: misattributing cancer symptoms to dementia, reactive care responses to cancer symptoms and the possibility of inadequately managed cancer symptoms.
Conclusions: Implementing earlier discussions about feasible care outcomes is crucial. These conversations should include considerations around hospital referral for oncology care or care through palliation in the NH. Without appropriate recognition of a clinical-only cancer diagnosis and support for staff it could lead to advancement of symptoms that might be challenging and less well managed. We outline several recommendations to support NHS to deliver person-centred care to residents with DCC.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.