Friedrich C Jassil, Raissa Hamelmann, Adrian Brown, Alisia Carnemolla, Helen Kingett, Jacqueline Doyle, Amy Kirk, Neville Lewis, Gemma Montagut, Parastou Marvasti, Kusuma Chaiyasoot, Roxanna Zakeri, Jessica Mok, Kalpana Devalia, Chetan Parmar, Janine Makaronidis, Rachel L Batterham
{"title":"探索减肥后营养行为和监督运动干预(BARI-LIFESTYLE)的可接受性:一种混合方法评估。","authors":"Friedrich C Jassil, Raissa Hamelmann, Adrian Brown, Alisia Carnemolla, Helen Kingett, Jacqueline Doyle, Amy Kirk, Neville Lewis, Gemma Montagut, Parastou Marvasti, Kusuma Chaiyasoot, Roxanna Zakeri, Jessica Mok, Kalpana Devalia, Chetan Parmar, Janine Makaronidis, Rachel L Batterham","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07927-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BARI-LIFESTYLE trial explored the impacts of a combined nutritional-behavioral tele-counselling and supervised exercise intervention in the first year following bariatric surgery. While the program did not elicit additional weight loss or improvements in health outcomes, evaluating its acceptability remains critical to refining future research and intervention design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed. First, the acceptability of the intervention program was determined through randomization refusal rate, dropout rate, intervention refusal rate, and attendance rate. Data from the self-reported exit questionnaire completed at the final study visit were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and free-text responses were examined using a content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 participants (74.7% female; mean ± SD age 44.8 ± 10.8 years; mean BMI 42.1 ± 5.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to the BARI-LIFESTYLE program. The randomization refusal rate was 2%. The tele-counselling achieved high acceptability, as evidenced by a low refusal rate (1.3%), and high attendance (79%), with 96.8% reporting the sessions as useful. Qualitative data further highlighted its role in supporting post-bariatric surgery lifestyle adaptation. In contrast, the supervised exercise program exhibited moderate acceptability, with a higher refusal rate (21.6%) and an attendance rate of 72.4%. Despite this, 98.1% of regular attendees found the sessions beneficial, particularly for addressing physical and psychological barriers to exercise. Key barriers to participation in both interventions included competing demands and scheduling conflicts. To improve the acceptability of future interventions, recommendations include the integration of mobile technology, increasing the frequency of tele-counselling sessions, enhancing accessibility to exercise classes, and providing personalized exercise programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participant-reported outcomes suggest that the BARI-LIFESTYLE program provided holistic support, addressing diet, exercise, social, and psychological aspects of life after bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Acceptability of Post-bariatric Nutritional-Behavioral and Supervised Exercise Intervention (BARI-LIFESTYLE): A Mixed Methods Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Friedrich C Jassil, Raissa Hamelmann, Adrian Brown, Alisia Carnemolla, Helen Kingett, Jacqueline Doyle, Amy Kirk, Neville Lewis, Gemma Montagut, Parastou Marvasti, Kusuma Chaiyasoot, Roxanna Zakeri, Jessica Mok, Kalpana Devalia, Chetan Parmar, Janine Makaronidis, Rachel L Batterham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-07927-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BARI-LIFESTYLE trial explored the impacts of a combined nutritional-behavioral tele-counselling and supervised exercise intervention in the first year following bariatric surgery. While the program did not elicit additional weight loss or improvements in health outcomes, evaluating its acceptability remains critical to refining future research and intervention design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed. First, the acceptability of the intervention program was determined through randomization refusal rate, dropout rate, intervention refusal rate, and attendance rate. Data from the self-reported exit questionnaire completed at the final study visit were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and free-text responses were examined using a content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 participants (74.7% female; mean ± SD age 44.8 ± 10.8 years; mean BMI 42.1 ± 5.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to the BARI-LIFESTYLE program. The randomization refusal rate was 2%. The tele-counselling achieved high acceptability, as evidenced by a low refusal rate (1.3%), and high attendance (79%), with 96.8% reporting the sessions as useful. Qualitative data further highlighted its role in supporting post-bariatric surgery lifestyle adaptation. In contrast, the supervised exercise program exhibited moderate acceptability, with a higher refusal rate (21.6%) and an attendance rate of 72.4%. Despite this, 98.1% of regular attendees found the sessions beneficial, particularly for addressing physical and psychological barriers to exercise. Key barriers to participation in both interventions included competing demands and scheduling conflicts. To improve the acceptability of future interventions, recommendations include the integration of mobile technology, increasing the frequency of tele-counselling sessions, enhancing accessibility to exercise classes, and providing personalized exercise programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participant-reported outcomes suggest that the BARI-LIFESTYLE program provided holistic support, addressing diet, exercise, social, and psychological aspects of life after bariatric surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07927-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07927-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the Acceptability of Post-bariatric Nutritional-Behavioral and Supervised Exercise Intervention (BARI-LIFESTYLE): A Mixed Methods Evaluation.
Background: The BARI-LIFESTYLE trial explored the impacts of a combined nutritional-behavioral tele-counselling and supervised exercise intervention in the first year following bariatric surgery. While the program did not elicit additional weight loss or improvements in health outcomes, evaluating its acceptability remains critical to refining future research and intervention design.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed. First, the acceptability of the intervention program was determined through randomization refusal rate, dropout rate, intervention refusal rate, and attendance rate. Data from the self-reported exit questionnaire completed at the final study visit were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and free-text responses were examined using a content analysis approach.
Results: A total of 79 participants (74.7% female; mean ± SD age 44.8 ± 10.8 years; mean BMI 42.1 ± 5.8 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to the BARI-LIFESTYLE program. The randomization refusal rate was 2%. The tele-counselling achieved high acceptability, as evidenced by a low refusal rate (1.3%), and high attendance (79%), with 96.8% reporting the sessions as useful. Qualitative data further highlighted its role in supporting post-bariatric surgery lifestyle adaptation. In contrast, the supervised exercise program exhibited moderate acceptability, with a higher refusal rate (21.6%) and an attendance rate of 72.4%. Despite this, 98.1% of regular attendees found the sessions beneficial, particularly for addressing physical and psychological barriers to exercise. Key barriers to participation in both interventions included competing demands and scheduling conflicts. To improve the acceptability of future interventions, recommendations include the integration of mobile technology, increasing the frequency of tele-counselling sessions, enhancing accessibility to exercise classes, and providing personalized exercise programs.
Conclusions: Participant-reported outcomes suggest that the BARI-LIFESTYLE program provided holistic support, addressing diet, exercise, social, and psychological aspects of life after bariatric surgery.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions.
Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.