探索减肥后营养行为和监督运动干预(BARI-LIFESTYLE)的可接受性:一种混合方法评估。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Friedrich C Jassil, Raissa Hamelmann, Adrian Brown, Alisia Carnemolla, Helen Kingett, Jacqueline Doyle, Amy Kirk, Neville Lewis, Gemma Montagut, Parastou Marvasti, Kusuma Chaiyasoot, Roxanna Zakeri, Jessica Mok, Kalpana Devalia, Chetan Parmar, Janine Makaronidis, Rachel L Batterham
{"title":"探索减肥后营养行为和监督运动干预(BARI-LIFESTYLE)的可接受性:一种混合方法评估。","authors":"Friedrich C Jassil, Raissa Hamelmann, Adrian Brown, Alisia Carnemolla, Helen Kingett, Jacqueline Doyle, Amy Kirk, Neville Lewis, Gemma Montagut, Parastou Marvasti, Kusuma Chaiyasoot, Roxanna Zakeri, Jessica Mok, Kalpana Devalia, Chetan Parmar, Janine Makaronidis, Rachel L Batterham","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07927-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BARI-LIFESTYLE trial explored the impacts of a combined nutritional-behavioral tele-counselling and supervised exercise intervention in the first year following bariatric surgery. While the program did not elicit additional weight loss or improvements in health outcomes, evaluating its acceptability remains critical to refining future research and intervention design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed. First, the acceptability of the intervention program was determined through randomization refusal rate, dropout rate, intervention refusal rate, and attendance rate. Data from the self-reported exit questionnaire completed at the final study visit were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and free-text responses were examined using a content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 participants (74.7% female; mean ± SD age 44.8 ± 10.8 years; mean BMI 42.1 ± 5.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to the BARI-LIFESTYLE program. The randomization refusal rate was 2%. The tele-counselling achieved high acceptability, as evidenced by a low refusal rate (1.3%), and high attendance (79%), with 96.8% reporting the sessions as useful. Qualitative data further highlighted its role in supporting post-bariatric surgery lifestyle adaptation. In contrast, the supervised exercise program exhibited moderate acceptability, with a higher refusal rate (21.6%) and an attendance rate of 72.4%. Despite this, 98.1% of regular attendees found the sessions beneficial, particularly for addressing physical and psychological barriers to exercise. Key barriers to participation in both interventions included competing demands and scheduling conflicts. To improve the acceptability of future interventions, recommendations include the integration of mobile technology, increasing the frequency of tele-counselling sessions, enhancing accessibility to exercise classes, and providing personalized exercise programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participant-reported outcomes suggest that the BARI-LIFESTYLE program provided holistic support, addressing diet, exercise, social, and psychological aspects of life after bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Acceptability of Post-bariatric Nutritional-Behavioral and Supervised Exercise Intervention (BARI-LIFESTYLE): A Mixed Methods Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Friedrich C Jassil, Raissa Hamelmann, Adrian Brown, Alisia Carnemolla, Helen Kingett, Jacqueline Doyle, Amy Kirk, Neville Lewis, Gemma Montagut, Parastou Marvasti, Kusuma Chaiyasoot, Roxanna Zakeri, Jessica Mok, Kalpana Devalia, Chetan Parmar, Janine Makaronidis, Rachel L Batterham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-07927-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BARI-LIFESTYLE trial explored the impacts of a combined nutritional-behavioral tele-counselling and supervised exercise intervention in the first year following bariatric surgery. While the program did not elicit additional weight loss or improvements in health outcomes, evaluating its acceptability remains critical to refining future research and intervention design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed. First, the acceptability of the intervention program was determined through randomization refusal rate, dropout rate, intervention refusal rate, and attendance rate. Data from the self-reported exit questionnaire completed at the final study visit were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and free-text responses were examined using a content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 participants (74.7% female; mean ± SD age 44.8 ± 10.8 years; mean BMI 42.1 ± 5.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to the BARI-LIFESTYLE program. The randomization refusal rate was 2%. The tele-counselling achieved high acceptability, as evidenced by a low refusal rate (1.3%), and high attendance (79%), with 96.8% reporting the sessions as useful. Qualitative data further highlighted its role in supporting post-bariatric surgery lifestyle adaptation. In contrast, the supervised exercise program exhibited moderate acceptability, with a higher refusal rate (21.6%) and an attendance rate of 72.4%. Despite this, 98.1% of regular attendees found the sessions beneficial, particularly for addressing physical and psychological barriers to exercise. Key barriers to participation in both interventions included competing demands and scheduling conflicts. To improve the acceptability of future interventions, recommendations include the integration of mobile technology, increasing the frequency of tele-counselling sessions, enhancing accessibility to exercise classes, and providing personalized exercise programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participant-reported outcomes suggest that the BARI-LIFESTYLE program provided holistic support, addressing diet, exercise, social, and psychological aspects of life after bariatric surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07927-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07927-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:BARI-LIFESTYLE试验探讨了在减肥手术后第一年营养-行为远程咨询和监督运动干预相结合的影响。虽然该计划没有引起额外的体重减轻或健康结果的改善,但评估其可接受性仍然是完善未来研究和干预设计的关键。方法:采用混合方法。首先,通过随机拒绝率、辍学率、干预拒绝率和出勤率来确定干预方案的可接受性。在最后一次研究访问中完成的自我报告退出问卷的数据使用描述性统计进行分析,并使用内容分析方法检查自由文本回答。结果:共79名受试者,其中女性74.7%;平均±SD年龄44.8±10.8岁;平均BMI(42.1±5.8 kg/m2)被随机分配到BARI-LIFESTYLE项目。随机拒绝率为2%。远程咨询获得了很高的可接受性,低拒取率(1.3%)和高出勤率(79%)证明了这一点,96.8%的人报告会议是有用的。定性数据进一步强调了它在支持减肥手术后生活方式适应方面的作用。相比之下,有监督的锻炼计划表现出中等程度的可接受性,拒学率较高(21.6%),出勤率为72.4%。尽管如此,98.1%的定期参与者认为这些课程有益,特别是在解决身体和心理障碍方面。参与这两种干预措施的主要障碍包括相互竞争的需求和时间安排冲突。为了提高未来干预措施的可接受性,建议包括整合移动技术,增加远程咨询会议的频率,提高锻炼课程的可及性,并提供个性化的锻炼计划。结论:参与者报告的结果表明,BARI-LIFESTYLE项目提供了全面的支持,解决了减肥手术后饮食、运动、社会和心理生活方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Acceptability of Post-bariatric Nutritional-Behavioral and Supervised Exercise Intervention (BARI-LIFESTYLE): A Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Background: The BARI-LIFESTYLE trial explored the impacts of a combined nutritional-behavioral tele-counselling and supervised exercise intervention in the first year following bariatric surgery. While the program did not elicit additional weight loss or improvements in health outcomes, evaluating its acceptability remains critical to refining future research and intervention design.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed. First, the acceptability of the intervention program was determined through randomization refusal rate, dropout rate, intervention refusal rate, and attendance rate. Data from the self-reported exit questionnaire completed at the final study visit were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and free-text responses were examined using a content analysis approach.

Results: A total of 79 participants (74.7% female; mean ± SD age 44.8 ± 10.8 years; mean BMI 42.1 ± 5.8 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to the BARI-LIFESTYLE program. The randomization refusal rate was 2%. The tele-counselling achieved high acceptability, as evidenced by a low refusal rate (1.3%), and high attendance (79%), with 96.8% reporting the sessions as useful. Qualitative data further highlighted its role in supporting post-bariatric surgery lifestyle adaptation. In contrast, the supervised exercise program exhibited moderate acceptability, with a higher refusal rate (21.6%) and an attendance rate of 72.4%. Despite this, 98.1% of regular attendees found the sessions beneficial, particularly for addressing physical and psychological barriers to exercise. Key barriers to participation in both interventions included competing demands and scheduling conflicts. To improve the acceptability of future interventions, recommendations include the integration of mobile technology, increasing the frequency of tele-counselling sessions, enhancing accessibility to exercise classes, and providing personalized exercise programs.

Conclusions: Participant-reported outcomes suggest that the BARI-LIFESTYLE program provided holistic support, addressing diet, exercise, social, and psychological aspects of life after bariatric surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信