使用粪便指示生物来管理未受点源污水影响的娱乐水道中的微生物健康风险:对流行病学证据的系统审查。

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of water and health Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.2166/wh.2025.304
Sonya Kozak, Anne Roiko, Katharina Gutjahr-Holland, Warish Ahmed, Cameron Veal, Paul Fisher, Simon Toze, Mark Weir, Helen Stratton
{"title":"使用粪便指示生物来管理未受点源污水影响的娱乐水道中的微生物健康风险:对流行病学证据的系统审查。","authors":"Sonya Kozak, Anne Roiko, Katharina Gutjahr-Holland, Warish Ahmed, Cameron Veal, Paul Fisher, Simon Toze, Mark Weir, Helen Stratton","doi":"10.2166/wh.2025.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This PRISMA review investigated the extent to which epidemiological evidence supports the use of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) to manage microbial health risks in recreational waters without point sources of sewage. The quality of papers meeting the inclusion criteria was appraised using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Risk of Bias tool and low-bias studies were synthesised. Studies consistently reported elevated illness risks (particularly gastrointestinal) among bathers compared with non-bathers. However, no FIOs or pathogens were associated consistently with any health outcomes. While enterococci most frequently correlated with a variety of illnesses, the relatively even split of positive and negative associations suggests an overall lack of association. Consequently, applying FIO guidelines derived from epidemiological studies with point sources of sewage could result in type I and type II errors. Overall, results suggest that the sources and drivers of health risks are site-specific. Tools including sanitary surveys, microbial source tracking, epidemiology and quantitative microbial risk assessment provide avenues for characterising site-specific health risks, for those who can afford them. Meanwhile, characterising the site-specific sources/drivers of contamination seems pragmatic as the limited evidence so far suggests that FIO monitoring may not be sufficient to protect health in these waters.</p>","PeriodicalId":17436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water and health","volume":"23 5","pages":"563-586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of faecal indicator organisms to manage microbial health risks in recreational waterways not impacted by point sources of sewage: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Kozak, Anne Roiko, Katharina Gutjahr-Holland, Warish Ahmed, Cameron Veal, Paul Fisher, Simon Toze, Mark Weir, Helen Stratton\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wh.2025.304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This PRISMA review investigated the extent to which epidemiological evidence supports the use of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) to manage microbial health risks in recreational waters without point sources of sewage. The quality of papers meeting the inclusion criteria was appraised using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Risk of Bias tool and low-bias studies were synthesised. Studies consistently reported elevated illness risks (particularly gastrointestinal) among bathers compared with non-bathers. However, no FIOs or pathogens were associated consistently with any health outcomes. While enterococci most frequently correlated with a variety of illnesses, the relatively even split of positive and negative associations suggests an overall lack of association. Consequently, applying FIO guidelines derived from epidemiological studies with point sources of sewage could result in type I and type II errors. Overall, results suggest that the sources and drivers of health risks are site-specific. Tools including sanitary surveys, microbial source tracking, epidemiology and quantitative microbial risk assessment provide avenues for characterising site-specific health risks, for those who can afford them. Meanwhile, characterising the site-specific sources/drivers of contamination seems pragmatic as the limited evidence so far suggests that FIO monitoring may not be sufficient to protect health in these waters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of water and health\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"563-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of water and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2025.304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water and health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2025.304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本次PRISMA审查调查了流行病学证据在多大程度上支持使用粪便指示生物(fio)来管理没有污水点源的娱乐水域中的微生物健康风险。使用健康评估和翻译办公室(OHAT)偏倚风险工具评价符合纳入标准的论文的质量,并综合低偏倚研究。研究一致报告,与不洗澡的人相比,洗澡的人患病风险(尤其是胃肠道疾病)更高。然而,没有fio或病原体与任何健康结果一致相关。虽然肠球菌最常与多种疾病相关,但积极和消极联系的相对平均的分裂表明总体上缺乏联系。因此,应用从污水点源的流行病学研究中得出的FIO准则可能导致第一类和第二类错误。总体而言,结果表明,健康风险的来源和驱动因素是特定地点的。卫生调查、微生物来源追踪、流行病学和微生物风险定量评估等工具为那些负担得起的人提供了描述特定地点健康风险的途径。同时,描述特定地点的污染源/驱动因素似乎是务实的,因为迄今为止有限的证据表明,FIO监测可能不足以保护这些水域的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of faecal indicator organisms to manage microbial health risks in recreational waterways not impacted by point sources of sewage: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence.

This PRISMA review investigated the extent to which epidemiological evidence supports the use of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) to manage microbial health risks in recreational waters without point sources of sewage. The quality of papers meeting the inclusion criteria was appraised using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Risk of Bias tool and low-bias studies were synthesised. Studies consistently reported elevated illness risks (particularly gastrointestinal) among bathers compared with non-bathers. However, no FIOs or pathogens were associated consistently with any health outcomes. While enterococci most frequently correlated with a variety of illnesses, the relatively even split of positive and negative associations suggests an overall lack of association. Consequently, applying FIO guidelines derived from epidemiological studies with point sources of sewage could result in type I and type II errors. Overall, results suggest that the sources and drivers of health risks are site-specific. Tools including sanitary surveys, microbial source tracking, epidemiology and quantitative microbial risk assessment provide avenues for characterising site-specific health risks, for those who can afford them. Meanwhile, characterising the site-specific sources/drivers of contamination seems pragmatic as the limited evidence so far suggests that FIO monitoring may not be sufficient to protect health in these waters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of water and health
Journal of water and health 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water and Health is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of information on the health implications and control of waterborne microorganisms and chemical substances in the broadest sense for developing and developed countries worldwide. This is to include microbial toxins, chemical quality and the aesthetic qualities of water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信