Hilary Y Liu, Mario Alessandri-Bonetti, Siddhi Shockey, Garth A Elias, Alain C Corcos, Jenny A Ziembicki, Francesco M Egro
{"title":"美国烧伤协会认证的烧伤中心非手术烧伤处理的横断面研究。","authors":"Hilary Y Liu, Mario Alessandri-Bonetti, Siddhi Shockey, Garth A Elias, Alain C Corcos, Jenny A Ziembicki, Francesco M Egro","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-fatal burn injuries are a leading cause of morbidity. However, among a variety of burn treatment options, there is no standard of care for the non-operative management of burns that do not require excision and skin grafting. This study aims to identify the most frequently used agents for non-operative burns in the US. A survey related to non-operative burns management was sent to 64 directors of ABA-verified burn centers. A total of 51.6% (n=33) directors of ABA-verified burn centers responded to the survey, reporting their most-used agents for non-operative superficial, superficial partial-thickness, deep partial-thickness, and full-thickness burns. Preferences varied by burn depth. For superficial burns, the top choice agents identified were Aquaphor (n=20; 60.6%), Eucerin (n=16; 48.5%), and antimicrobial ointments such as bacitracin, neomycin, or polymyxin (n=8; 24.2%). For superficial partial-thickness burns, antimicrobial ointments (n=27; 81.8%) and Mepilex Ag (n=19; 57.6%) were the preferred agents. The preferred agents for deep partial-thickness burns were antimicrobial ointments (n=18; 54.5%), Mepilex Ag (n=15; 45.5%), and chemical debridement agents such as Santyl, Xenaderm, or Granulex (n=13; 39.4%). The preferred agents for full-thickness burns were silver sulfadiazine cream 1% (n=15; 45.5%), chemical debridement agents (n=8; 24.2%), and antimicrobial ointments (n=6; 18.2%).</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Sectional Study on the Management of Non-Operative Burns at American Burn Association-Verified Burn Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Hilary Y Liu, Mario Alessandri-Bonetti, Siddhi Shockey, Garth A Elias, Alain C Corcos, Jenny A Ziembicki, Francesco M Egro\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Non-fatal burn injuries are a leading cause of morbidity. However, among a variety of burn treatment options, there is no standard of care for the non-operative management of burns that do not require excision and skin grafting. This study aims to identify the most frequently used agents for non-operative burns in the US. A survey related to non-operative burns management was sent to 64 directors of ABA-verified burn centers. A total of 51.6% (n=33) directors of ABA-verified burn centers responded to the survey, reporting their most-used agents for non-operative superficial, superficial partial-thickness, deep partial-thickness, and full-thickness burns. Preferences varied by burn depth. For superficial burns, the top choice agents identified were Aquaphor (n=20; 60.6%), Eucerin (n=16; 48.5%), and antimicrobial ointments such as bacitracin, neomycin, or polymyxin (n=8; 24.2%). For superficial partial-thickness burns, antimicrobial ointments (n=27; 81.8%) and Mepilex Ag (n=19; 57.6%) were the preferred agents. The preferred agents for deep partial-thickness burns were antimicrobial ointments (n=18; 54.5%), Mepilex Ag (n=15; 45.5%), and chemical debridement agents such as Santyl, Xenaderm, or Granulex (n=13; 39.4%). The preferred agents for full-thickness burns were silver sulfadiazine cream 1% (n=15; 45.5%), chemical debridement agents (n=8; 24.2%), and antimicrobial ointments (n=6; 18.2%).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非致死性烧伤是发病率的主要原因。然而,在各种各样的烧伤治疗方案中,对于不需要切除和植皮的烧伤非手术治疗没有标准的护理。本研究旨在确定美国非手术烧伤最常用的药物。一份与非手术烧伤管理相关的调查发给了64位美国烧伤协会认证的烧伤中心主任。共有51.6% (n=33)的aba认证烧伤中心主任回应了调查,报告了他们最常用的非手术浅表、浅表部分厚度、深度部分厚度和全层烧伤药物。烧伤深度不同,偏好也不同。对于浅表烧伤,确定的首选药物是阿夸弗(n=20;60.6%), Eucerin (n=16;48.5%)和抗菌软膏,如杆菌肽、新霉素或多粘菌素(n=8;24.2%)。对于浅表部分烧伤,使用抗菌软膏(n=27;81.8%)和Mepilex Ag (n=19;57.6%)为首选药物。深度部分厚度烧伤首选抗菌软膏(n=18;54.5%), Mepilex Ag (n=15;45.5%)和化学清创剂,如sanyl、Xenaderm或Granulex (n=13;39.4%)。全层烧伤首选药物为1%磺胺嘧啶银乳膏(n=15;45.5%),化学清创剂(n=8;24.2%)和抗菌软膏(n=6;18.2%)。
Cross-Sectional Study on the Management of Non-Operative Burns at American Burn Association-Verified Burn Centers.
Non-fatal burn injuries are a leading cause of morbidity. However, among a variety of burn treatment options, there is no standard of care for the non-operative management of burns that do not require excision and skin grafting. This study aims to identify the most frequently used agents for non-operative burns in the US. A survey related to non-operative burns management was sent to 64 directors of ABA-verified burn centers. A total of 51.6% (n=33) directors of ABA-verified burn centers responded to the survey, reporting their most-used agents for non-operative superficial, superficial partial-thickness, deep partial-thickness, and full-thickness burns. Preferences varied by burn depth. For superficial burns, the top choice agents identified were Aquaphor (n=20; 60.6%), Eucerin (n=16; 48.5%), and antimicrobial ointments such as bacitracin, neomycin, or polymyxin (n=8; 24.2%). For superficial partial-thickness burns, antimicrobial ointments (n=27; 81.8%) and Mepilex Ag (n=19; 57.6%) were the preferred agents. The preferred agents for deep partial-thickness burns were antimicrobial ointments (n=18; 54.5%), Mepilex Ag (n=15; 45.5%), and chemical debridement agents such as Santyl, Xenaderm, or Granulex (n=13; 39.4%). The preferred agents for full-thickness burns were silver sulfadiazine cream 1% (n=15; 45.5%), chemical debridement agents (n=8; 24.2%), and antimicrobial ointments (n=6; 18.2%).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.