{"title":"十二烷基硫酸钠-毛细管凝胶电泳与天然荧光检测定量蛋白质治疗药物的关键质量属性。","authors":"Zaifang Zhu","doi":"10.1002/elps.8154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the biopharmaceutical industry, the sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE) assay is often used to assess therapeutic critical quality attributes (CQAs). Traditional detection methods for SDS-CGE methods, such as ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), are widely used but come with limitations. A native fluorescence detection (NFD) scheme was previously developed to enhance sensitivity and reduce gel matrix interference without requiring sample derivatization, and the SDS-CGE-NFD assay exhibited high precision and accuracy for absolute quantification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this work, we assessed the suitability of SDS-CGE-NFD to quantification of CQAs in protein therapeutics, which is generally relative rather than absolute. NFD was compared with UV absorbance and LIF detection for quantifying CQAs of protein therapeutics in SDS-CGE. Three lots of NIST monoclonal antibody (NISTmAb) were assayed by SDS-CGE with NFD, UV, and LIF detection, and the relative abundance of total fragments was compared and found similar. Analysis with NFD measured abundances at a range of 1.77%-2.00%, compared to the range of 1.53%-1.78% measured with UV absorbance and 1.63%-1.86% measured with LIF. Aggregates were not recognized with UV absorbance but were apparent with measured relative abundance of 0.38%-0.40% using NFD and 0.35%-0.40% using LIF. Under the reducing conditions, glycosylation site occupancy on the heavy chain was measured in the range of 99.30%-99.33% with all three detection approaches. The comparable results measured with three detection modes suggested that SDS-CGE-NFD was suitable to quantify CQAs of protein therapeutics. The SDS-CGE-NFD workflow was successfully applied to analyze two commercial protein therapeutics, a bispecific mAb of ∼146 kDa (Emicizumab) and an Fc-fusion protein of ∼63 kDa (Dulaglutide).</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Critical Quality Attributes of Protein Therapeutics by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Capillary Gel Electrophoresis With Native Fluorescence Detection.\",\"authors\":\"Zaifang Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/elps.8154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the biopharmaceutical industry, the sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE) assay is often used to assess therapeutic critical quality attributes (CQAs). Traditional detection methods for SDS-CGE methods, such as ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), are widely used but come with limitations. A native fluorescence detection (NFD) scheme was previously developed to enhance sensitivity and reduce gel matrix interference without requiring sample derivatization, and the SDS-CGE-NFD assay exhibited high precision and accuracy for absolute quantification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this work, we assessed the suitability of SDS-CGE-NFD to quantification of CQAs in protein therapeutics, which is generally relative rather than absolute. NFD was compared with UV absorbance and LIF detection for quantifying CQAs of protein therapeutics in SDS-CGE. Three lots of NIST monoclonal antibody (NISTmAb) were assayed by SDS-CGE with NFD, UV, and LIF detection, and the relative abundance of total fragments was compared and found similar. Analysis with NFD measured abundances at a range of 1.77%-2.00%, compared to the range of 1.53%-1.78% measured with UV absorbance and 1.63%-1.86% measured with LIF. Aggregates were not recognized with UV absorbance but were apparent with measured relative abundance of 0.38%-0.40% using NFD and 0.35%-0.40% using LIF. Under the reducing conditions, glycosylation site occupancy on the heavy chain was measured in the range of 99.30%-99.33% with all three detection approaches. The comparable results measured with three detection modes suggested that SDS-CGE-NFD was suitable to quantify CQAs of protein therapeutics. The SDS-CGE-NFD workflow was successfully applied to analyze two commercial protein therapeutics, a bispecific mAb of ∼146 kDa (Emicizumab) and an Fc-fusion protein of ∼63 kDa (Dulaglutide).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying Critical Quality Attributes of Protein Therapeutics by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Capillary Gel Electrophoresis With Native Fluorescence Detection.
In the biopharmaceutical industry, the sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE) assay is often used to assess therapeutic critical quality attributes (CQAs). Traditional detection methods for SDS-CGE methods, such as ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), are widely used but come with limitations. A native fluorescence detection (NFD) scheme was previously developed to enhance sensitivity and reduce gel matrix interference without requiring sample derivatization, and the SDS-CGE-NFD assay exhibited high precision and accuracy for absolute quantification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this work, we assessed the suitability of SDS-CGE-NFD to quantification of CQAs in protein therapeutics, which is generally relative rather than absolute. NFD was compared with UV absorbance and LIF detection for quantifying CQAs of protein therapeutics in SDS-CGE. Three lots of NIST monoclonal antibody (NISTmAb) were assayed by SDS-CGE with NFD, UV, and LIF detection, and the relative abundance of total fragments was compared and found similar. Analysis with NFD measured abundances at a range of 1.77%-2.00%, compared to the range of 1.53%-1.78% measured with UV absorbance and 1.63%-1.86% measured with LIF. Aggregates were not recognized with UV absorbance but were apparent with measured relative abundance of 0.38%-0.40% using NFD and 0.35%-0.40% using LIF. Under the reducing conditions, glycosylation site occupancy on the heavy chain was measured in the range of 99.30%-99.33% with all three detection approaches. The comparable results measured with three detection modes suggested that SDS-CGE-NFD was suitable to quantify CQAs of protein therapeutics. The SDS-CGE-NFD workflow was successfully applied to analyze two commercial protein therapeutics, a bispecific mAb of ∼146 kDa (Emicizumab) and an Fc-fusion protein of ∼63 kDa (Dulaglutide).
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.