十二烷基硫酸钠-毛细管凝胶电泳与天然荧光检测定量蛋白质治疗药物的关键质量属性。

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
ELECTROPHORESIS Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1002/elps.8154
Zaifang Zhu
{"title":"十二烷基硫酸钠-毛细管凝胶电泳与天然荧光检测定量蛋白质治疗药物的关键质量属性。","authors":"Zaifang Zhu","doi":"10.1002/elps.8154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the biopharmaceutical industry, the sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE) assay is often used to assess therapeutic critical quality attributes (CQAs). Traditional detection methods for SDS-CGE methods, such as ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), are widely used but come with limitations. A native fluorescence detection (NFD) scheme was previously developed to enhance sensitivity and reduce gel matrix interference without requiring sample derivatization, and the SDS-CGE-NFD assay exhibited high precision and accuracy for absolute quantification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this work, we assessed the suitability of SDS-CGE-NFD to quantification of CQAs in protein therapeutics, which is generally relative rather than absolute. NFD was compared with UV absorbance and LIF detection for quantifying CQAs of protein therapeutics in SDS-CGE. Three lots of NIST monoclonal antibody (NISTmAb) were assayed by SDS-CGE with NFD, UV, and LIF detection, and the relative abundance of total fragments was compared and found similar. Analysis with NFD measured abundances at a range of 1.77%-2.00%, compared to the range of 1.53%-1.78% measured with UV absorbance and 1.63%-1.86% measured with LIF. Aggregates were not recognized with UV absorbance but were apparent with measured relative abundance of 0.38%-0.40% using NFD and 0.35%-0.40% using LIF. Under the reducing conditions, glycosylation site occupancy on the heavy chain was measured in the range of 99.30%-99.33% with all three detection approaches. The comparable results measured with three detection modes suggested that SDS-CGE-NFD was suitable to quantify CQAs of protein therapeutics. The SDS-CGE-NFD workflow was successfully applied to analyze two commercial protein therapeutics, a bispecific mAb of ∼146 kDa (Emicizumab) and an Fc-fusion protein of ∼63 kDa (Dulaglutide).</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Critical Quality Attributes of Protein Therapeutics by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Capillary Gel Electrophoresis With Native Fluorescence Detection.\",\"authors\":\"Zaifang Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/elps.8154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the biopharmaceutical industry, the sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE) assay is often used to assess therapeutic critical quality attributes (CQAs). Traditional detection methods for SDS-CGE methods, such as ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), are widely used but come with limitations. A native fluorescence detection (NFD) scheme was previously developed to enhance sensitivity and reduce gel matrix interference without requiring sample derivatization, and the SDS-CGE-NFD assay exhibited high precision and accuracy for absolute quantification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this work, we assessed the suitability of SDS-CGE-NFD to quantification of CQAs in protein therapeutics, which is generally relative rather than absolute. NFD was compared with UV absorbance and LIF detection for quantifying CQAs of protein therapeutics in SDS-CGE. Three lots of NIST monoclonal antibody (NISTmAb) were assayed by SDS-CGE with NFD, UV, and LIF detection, and the relative abundance of total fragments was compared and found similar. Analysis with NFD measured abundances at a range of 1.77%-2.00%, compared to the range of 1.53%-1.78% measured with UV absorbance and 1.63%-1.86% measured with LIF. Aggregates were not recognized with UV absorbance but were apparent with measured relative abundance of 0.38%-0.40% using NFD and 0.35%-0.40% using LIF. Under the reducing conditions, glycosylation site occupancy on the heavy chain was measured in the range of 99.30%-99.33% with all three detection approaches. The comparable results measured with three detection modes suggested that SDS-CGE-NFD was suitable to quantify CQAs of protein therapeutics. The SDS-CGE-NFD workflow was successfully applied to analyze two commercial protein therapeutics, a bispecific mAb of ∼146 kDa (Emicizumab) and an Fc-fusion protein of ∼63 kDa (Dulaglutide).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在生物制药行业,十二烷基硫酸钠-毛细管凝胶电泳(SDS-CGE)检测通常用于评估治疗关键质量属性(cqa)。传统的SDS-CGE检测方法,如紫外(UV)吸光度和激光诱导荧光(LIF),被广泛使用,但存在局限性。一种原生荧光检测(NFD)方案在不需要样品衍生化的情况下提高了灵敏度,减少了凝胶基质的干扰,SDS-CGE-NFD检测在单克隆抗体(mab)的绝对定量方面具有很高的精度和准确性。在这项工作中,我们评估了SDS-CGE-NFD对蛋白质治疗中cqa定量的适用性,这通常是相对的而不是绝对的。将NFD与紫外吸光度和LIF检测在SDS-CGE中定量蛋白质治疗药物的cqa进行比较。对3批NIST单克隆抗体(NISTmAb)进行SDS-CGE检测,并结合NFD、UV和LIF检测,比较总片段的相对丰度,发现相似。NFD分析测得的丰度范围为1.77%-2.00%,而紫外吸收法测得的丰度范围为1.53%-1.78%,LIF测得的丰度范围为1.63%-1.86%。聚集体没有被紫外吸收光谱识别出来,但聚集体明显,NFD和LIF的相对丰度分别为0.38% ~ 0.40%和0.35% ~ 0.40%。在还原条件下,三种检测方法在重链上的糖基化位点占用率均在99.30% ~ 99.33%之间。三种检测模式的比较结果表明,SDS-CGE-NFD适用于定量蛋白质治疗药物的cqa。SDS-CGE-NFD工作流程成功地应用于分析两种商业蛋白质疗法,一种双特异性单抗(Emicizumab)为~ 146 kDa,一种fc融合蛋白为~ 63 kDa (Dulaglutide)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Critical Quality Attributes of Protein Therapeutics by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Capillary Gel Electrophoresis With Native Fluorescence Detection.

In the biopharmaceutical industry, the sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE) assay is often used to assess therapeutic critical quality attributes (CQAs). Traditional detection methods for SDS-CGE methods, such as ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), are widely used but come with limitations. A native fluorescence detection (NFD) scheme was previously developed to enhance sensitivity and reduce gel matrix interference without requiring sample derivatization, and the SDS-CGE-NFD assay exhibited high precision and accuracy for absolute quantification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this work, we assessed the suitability of SDS-CGE-NFD to quantification of CQAs in protein therapeutics, which is generally relative rather than absolute. NFD was compared with UV absorbance and LIF detection for quantifying CQAs of protein therapeutics in SDS-CGE. Three lots of NIST monoclonal antibody (NISTmAb) were assayed by SDS-CGE with NFD, UV, and LIF detection, and the relative abundance of total fragments was compared and found similar. Analysis with NFD measured abundances at a range of 1.77%-2.00%, compared to the range of 1.53%-1.78% measured with UV absorbance and 1.63%-1.86% measured with LIF. Aggregates were not recognized with UV absorbance but were apparent with measured relative abundance of 0.38%-0.40% using NFD and 0.35%-0.40% using LIF. Under the reducing conditions, glycosylation site occupancy on the heavy chain was measured in the range of 99.30%-99.33% with all three detection approaches. The comparable results measured with three detection modes suggested that SDS-CGE-NFD was suitable to quantify CQAs of protein therapeutics. The SDS-CGE-NFD workflow was successfully applied to analyze two commercial protein therapeutics, a bispecific mAb of ∼146 kDa (Emicizumab) and an Fc-fusion protein of ∼63 kDa (Dulaglutide).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ELECTROPHORESIS
ELECTROPHORESIS 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.). Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences. Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases. Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered. Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics: • Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry • Single cell and subcellular analysis • Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS) • Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing) • Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation • Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis • Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信