利用研究指导委员会促进利益相关者参与:巴西实施项目的多方面战略。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carlos Alberto Dos Santos Treichel, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel, Ana Laura Salomé Lourencetti, Maria Fernanda Lirani Dos Reis, Angela Pereira Figueiredo, Bianca Brandão da Silva, Rosana Teresa Onocko Campos
{"title":"利用研究指导委员会促进利益相关者参与:巴西实施项目的多方面战略。","authors":"Carlos Alberto Dos Santos Treichel, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel, Ana Laura Salomé Lourencetti, Maria Fernanda Lirani Dos Reis, Angela Pereira Figueiredo, Bianca Brandão da Silva, Rosana Teresa Onocko Campos","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04081-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research steering committees (RSCs) are increasingly recognized as a strategy for stakeholder engagement. Drawing on the experiences of participants from three RSCs involved in health care implementation projects in Brazil, this study aims to examine the contributions of RSCs to implementation research based on their impact on implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study was conducted between August and December 2024. Shared appreciation groups with eight researchers facilitated consensus on RSC operationalization. Additionally, semistructured interviews with 12 RSC members from three research projects explored the contributions to stakeholder engagement and implementation outcomes. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen discrete implementation strategies were identified within four categories: use evaluative and iterative strategies, adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and train and educate stakeholders. The RSCs influenced six implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, penetration, and sustainability. Appropriateness and feasibility emerged as the most prominent outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research steering committees constitute a multifaceted implementation strategy that fosters structured stakeholder engagement. By integrating multiple implementation strategies, they enhance collaboration, contextual adaptation, and shared governance. Their impact on appropriateness and feasibility highlights their relevance as a support mechanism for implementation success and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging research steering committees for stakeholder engagement: a multifaceted strategy in Brazilian implementation projects.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Alberto Dos Santos Treichel, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel, Ana Laura Salomé Lourencetti, Maria Fernanda Lirani Dos Reis, Angela Pereira Figueiredo, Bianca Brandão da Silva, Rosana Teresa Onocko Campos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00103-025-04081-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research steering committees (RSCs) are increasingly recognized as a strategy for stakeholder engagement. Drawing on the experiences of participants from three RSCs involved in health care implementation projects in Brazil, this study aims to examine the contributions of RSCs to implementation research based on their impact on implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study was conducted between August and December 2024. Shared appreciation groups with eight researchers facilitated consensus on RSC operationalization. Additionally, semistructured interviews with 12 RSC members from three research projects explored the contributions to stakeholder engagement and implementation outcomes. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen discrete implementation strategies were identified within four categories: use evaluative and iterative strategies, adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and train and educate stakeholders. The RSCs influenced six implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, penetration, and sustainability. Appropriateness and feasibility emerged as the most prominent outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research steering committees constitute a multifaceted implementation strategy that fosters structured stakeholder engagement. By integrating multiple implementation strategies, they enhance collaboration, contextual adaptation, and shared governance. Their impact on appropriateness and feasibility highlights their relevance as a support mechanism for implementation success and sustainability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04081-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04081-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究指导委员会(RSCs)越来越被认为是利益相关者参与的一种策略。根据参与巴西卫生保健实施项目的三个区域服务中心参与者的经验,本研究旨在根据区域服务中心对实施结果的影响,检查它们对实施研究的贡献。方法:于2024年8月至12月进行描述性、探索性、定性研究。与8位研究人员共同的赞赏小组促进了对RSC运作的共识。此外,对来自三个研究项目的12名RSC成员进行了半结构化访谈,探讨了对利益相关者参与和实施结果的贡献。数据采用主题内容分析法进行分析。结果:在四个类别中确定了13个离散的实施策略:使用评估和迭代策略,适应和定制上下文,发展利益相关者之间的关系,以及培训和教育利益相关者。RSCs影响了六个实施结果:可接受性、采用性、适当性、可行性、渗透性和可持续性。最突出的结果是适当性和可行性。结论:研究指导委员会构成了一个多方面的实施战略,促进了利益相关者的结构化参与。通过集成多种实现策略,它们可以增强协作、上下文适应和共享治理。它们对适当性和可行性的影响突出了它们作为执行成功和可持续性的支助机制的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging research steering committees for stakeholder engagement: a multifaceted strategy in Brazilian implementation projects.

Introduction: Research steering committees (RSCs) are increasingly recognized as a strategy for stakeholder engagement. Drawing on the experiences of participants from three RSCs involved in health care implementation projects in Brazil, this study aims to examine the contributions of RSCs to implementation research based on their impact on implementation outcomes.

Methods: This descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study was conducted between August and December 2024. Shared appreciation groups with eight researchers facilitated consensus on RSC operationalization. Additionally, semistructured interviews with 12 RSC members from three research projects explored the contributions to stakeholder engagement and implementation outcomes. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Thirteen discrete implementation strategies were identified within four categories: use evaluative and iterative strategies, adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and train and educate stakeholders. The RSCs influenced six implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, penetration, and sustainability. Appropriateness and feasibility emerged as the most prominent outcomes.

Conclusion: Research steering committees constitute a multifaceted implementation strategy that fosters structured stakeholder engagement. By integrating multiple implementation strategies, they enhance collaboration, contextual adaptation, and shared governance. Their impact on appropriateness and feasibility highlights their relevance as a support mechanism for implementation success and sustainability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信