评估ICD-11创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍结构:国际创伤问卷的荟萃分析验证性因素分析。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Reuben Kindred, Suzanne Jak, Ruby Hamer, Maja Nedeljkovic, Glen W Bates
{"title":"评估ICD-11创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍结构:国际创伤问卷的荟萃分析验证性因素分析。","authors":"Reuben Kindred, Suzanne Jak, Ruby Hamer, Maja Nedeljkovic, Glen W Bates","doi":"10.1177/10731911251340837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a widely used diagnostic tool for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD). Although findings are mixed, investigations of the ITQ's internal structure have most often supported a six-factor first-order model and a two-factor second-order model. This study utilized meta-analytic factor analysis to investigate the ITQ's latent structure. A systematic search of PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations was conducted, with 57 studies (total <i>N</i> = 43,066) included in the final analysis. A two-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach was implemented which pooled correlation matrices and performed confirmatory factor analyses. The two-factor second-order model demonstrated good fit, emphasizing its clinical relevance. However, a seven-factor correlated first-order model demonstrated superior fit, consistently outperforming other models across ITQ versions, symptom severity levels, English versus translated versions, and both PTSD and non-PTSD samples. This model indicates that CPTSD encompasses a broad range of symptoms and specifically that the distinction between affective hyperactivation and hypoactivation is important to progress the construct validity of CPTSD. Additionally, reliability analyses revealed limited internal consistency at the subscale level. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive assessments and refined item content to enhance CPTSD measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251340837"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD Constructs: A Meta-Analytic Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the International Trauma Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Reuben Kindred, Suzanne Jak, Ruby Hamer, Maja Nedeljkovic, Glen W Bates\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911251340837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a widely used diagnostic tool for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD). Although findings are mixed, investigations of the ITQ's internal structure have most often supported a six-factor first-order model and a two-factor second-order model. This study utilized meta-analytic factor analysis to investigate the ITQ's latent structure. A systematic search of PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations was conducted, with 57 studies (total <i>N</i> = 43,066) included in the final analysis. A two-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach was implemented which pooled correlation matrices and performed confirmatory factor analyses. The two-factor second-order model demonstrated good fit, emphasizing its clinical relevance. However, a seven-factor correlated first-order model demonstrated superior fit, consistently outperforming other models across ITQ versions, symptom severity levels, English versus translated versions, and both PTSD and non-PTSD samples. This model indicates that CPTSD encompasses a broad range of symptoms and specifically that the distinction between affective hyperactivation and hypoactivation is important to progress the construct validity of CPTSD. Additionally, reliability analyses revealed limited internal consistency at the subscale level. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive assessments and refined item content to enhance CPTSD measurement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911251340837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251340837\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251340837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际创伤问卷(ITQ)是一种广泛应用于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的诊断工具。尽管调查结果喜忧参半,但对ITQ内部结构的调查通常支持六因素一阶模型和两因素二阶模型。本研究采用元分析因子分析法探讨ITQ的潜在结构。系统检索PsycINFO、Web of Science、PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane、Scopus、CINAHL、ProQuest等论文,最终分析纳入57篇研究(总N = 43066)。采用两阶段元分析结构方程建模方法,合并相关矩阵并进行验证性因子分析。双因素二阶模型显示出良好的拟合,强调其临床相关性。然而,一个七因素相关的一阶模型显示出更好的拟合,在ITQ版本、症状严重程度、英语版本与翻译版本、创伤后应激障碍和非创伤后应激障碍样本中始终优于其他模型。该模型表明,CPTSD包含了广泛的症状,特别是区分情感过度激活和低激活对于提高CPTSD的构念效度很重要。此外,信度分析显示,在子量表水平有限的内部一致性。这些发现突出了全面评估和改进项目内容以加强CPTSD测量的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD Constructs: A Meta-Analytic Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the International Trauma Questionnaire.

The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a widely used diagnostic tool for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD). Although findings are mixed, investigations of the ITQ's internal structure have most often supported a six-factor first-order model and a two-factor second-order model. This study utilized meta-analytic factor analysis to investigate the ITQ's latent structure. A systematic search of PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations was conducted, with 57 studies (total N = 43,066) included in the final analysis. A two-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach was implemented which pooled correlation matrices and performed confirmatory factor analyses. The two-factor second-order model demonstrated good fit, emphasizing its clinical relevance. However, a seven-factor correlated first-order model demonstrated superior fit, consistently outperforming other models across ITQ versions, symptom severity levels, English versus translated versions, and both PTSD and non-PTSD samples. This model indicates that CPTSD encompasses a broad range of symptoms and specifically that the distinction between affective hyperactivation and hypoactivation is important to progress the construct validity of CPTSD. Additionally, reliability analyses revealed limited internal consistency at the subscale level. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive assessments and refined item content to enhance CPTSD measurement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信