Allen Chiang , Matthew Davis , Warren Stevens , Sunir Garg , Tom Sheidow , Daniel L. Jones , Michele Intorcia , Alex McKeown , Ursula M. Schmidt-Erfurth , Sujata P. Sarda , Caroline R. Baumal
{"title":"Pegcetacoplan治疗的视力和生活质量:来自OAKS和DERBY试验的事后分析。","authors":"Allen Chiang , Matthew Davis , Warren Stevens , Sunir Garg , Tom Sheidow , Daniel L. Jones , Michele Intorcia , Alex McKeown , Ursula M. Schmidt-Erfurth , Sujata P. Sarda , Caroline R. Baumal","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To evaluate the effect of pegcetacoplan on visual function and patient quality of life (QoL) measures based on distance of geographic atrophy (GA) lesions from the center of the fovea.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>Post hoc analysis from OAKS and DERBY, two global, 24-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled phase 3 studies evaluating pegcetacoplan treatment for GA in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).</div></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><div>888 study patients with GA for whom all data necessary for the post hoc analysis to be performed had been collected were included.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) were assessed at baseline and every 4 and 6 months, respectively, to completion at month 24 in both pegcetacoplan-treated eyes and sham (observed) eyes. Eyes were stratified based on optical coherence tomography‒derived GA lesion location ≥250 µm (<em>n</em> = 192) or <250 µm (<em>n</em> = 696) from the foveal center.</div></div><div><h3>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>Change from baseline in BCVA and NEI VFQ-25 was evaluated over 24 months in GA lesions based on distance (≥250 or <250 µm) from the foveal center. Adjustment was conducted via propensity score weighting, where model specification and baseline covariate selection were done a priori based on clinical rationale.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Pegcetacoplan-treated eyes with GA lesion margins ≥250 µm from the foveal center demonstrated directionally slower decline in visual acuity (mean +5.6 [SE 3.2] [<em>P</em> = .0785]) and QoL (mean +4.0 [SE 2.4] [<em>P</em> = .0905]) from baseline at 24 months compared with sham. The change in visual acuity (BCVA, mean −1.6 [SE 1.1] [<em>P</em> = .1522]) and QoL (NEI VFQ-25, −2.3 [1.1] [<em>P</em> = .0284]) in pegcetacoplan-treated eyes with GA lesion margins <250 µm from the foveal center were within the limits of variability compared with sham.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Pegcetacoplan treatment demonstrated a potentially meaningful slower decline in visual acuity and QoL for patients with GA lesions ≥250 µm from the foveal center. The change in visual acuity and QoL seen with pegcetacoplan treatment for patients with GA lesions <250 µm from the foveal center were within the limits of variability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"277 ","pages":"Pages 471-481"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual Acuity and Quality of Life Outcomes With Pegcetacoplan Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis From the OAKS and DERBY Trials\",\"authors\":\"Allen Chiang , Matthew Davis , Warren Stevens , Sunir Garg , Tom Sheidow , Daniel L. Jones , Michele Intorcia , Alex McKeown , Ursula M. Schmidt-Erfurth , Sujata P. Sarda , Caroline R. Baumal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To evaluate the effect of pegcetacoplan on visual function and patient quality of life (QoL) measures based on distance of geographic atrophy (GA) lesions from the center of the fovea.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>Post hoc analysis from OAKS and DERBY, two global, 24-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled phase 3 studies evaluating pegcetacoplan treatment for GA in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).</div></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><div>888 study patients with GA for whom all data necessary for the post hoc analysis to be performed had been collected were included.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) were assessed at baseline and every 4 and 6 months, respectively, to completion at month 24 in both pegcetacoplan-treated eyes and sham (observed) eyes. Eyes were stratified based on optical coherence tomography‒derived GA lesion location ≥250 µm (<em>n</em> = 192) or <250 µm (<em>n</em> = 696) from the foveal center.</div></div><div><h3>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>Change from baseline in BCVA and NEI VFQ-25 was evaluated over 24 months in GA lesions based on distance (≥250 or <250 µm) from the foveal center. Adjustment was conducted via propensity score weighting, where model specification and baseline covariate selection were done a priori based on clinical rationale.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Pegcetacoplan-treated eyes with GA lesion margins ≥250 µm from the foveal center demonstrated directionally slower decline in visual acuity (mean +5.6 [SE 3.2] [<em>P</em> = .0785]) and QoL (mean +4.0 [SE 2.4] [<em>P</em> = .0905]) from baseline at 24 months compared with sham. The change in visual acuity (BCVA, mean −1.6 [SE 1.1] [<em>P</em> = .1522]) and QoL (NEI VFQ-25, −2.3 [1.1] [<em>P</em> = .0284]) in pegcetacoplan-treated eyes with GA lesion margins <250 µm from the foveal center were within the limits of variability compared with sham.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Pegcetacoplan treatment demonstrated a potentially meaningful slower decline in visual acuity and QoL for patients with GA lesions ≥250 µm from the foveal center. The change in visual acuity and QoL seen with pegcetacoplan treatment for patients with GA lesions <250 µm from the foveal center were within the limits of variability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"277 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 471-481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425002600\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425002600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visual Acuity and Quality of Life Outcomes With Pegcetacoplan Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis From the OAKS and DERBY Trials
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of pegcetacoplan on visual function and patient quality of life (QoL) measures based on distance of geographic atrophy (GA) lesions from the center of the fovea.
DESIGN
Post hoc analysis from OAKS and DERBY, two global, 24-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled phase 3 studies evaluating pegcetacoplan treatment for GA in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
PARTICIPANTS
888 study patients with GA for whom all data necessary for the post hoc analysis to be performed had been collected were included.
METHODS
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) were assessed at baseline and every 4 and 6 months, respectively, to completion at month 24 in both pegcetacoplan-treated eyes and sham (observed) eyes. Eyes were stratified based on optical coherence tomography‒derived GA lesion location ≥250 µm (n = 192) or <250 µm (n = 696) from the foveal center.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Change from baseline in BCVA and NEI VFQ-25 was evaluated over 24 months in GA lesions based on distance (≥250 or <250 µm) from the foveal center. Adjustment was conducted via propensity score weighting, where model specification and baseline covariate selection were done a priori based on clinical rationale.
RESULTS
Pegcetacoplan-treated eyes with GA lesion margins ≥250 µm from the foveal center demonstrated directionally slower decline in visual acuity (mean +5.6 [SE 3.2] [P = .0785]) and QoL (mean +4.0 [SE 2.4] [P = .0905]) from baseline at 24 months compared with sham. The change in visual acuity (BCVA, mean −1.6 [SE 1.1] [P = .1522]) and QoL (NEI VFQ-25, −2.3 [1.1] [P = .0284]) in pegcetacoplan-treated eyes with GA lesion margins <250 µm from the foveal center were within the limits of variability compared with sham.
CONCLUSIONS
Pegcetacoplan treatment demonstrated a potentially meaningful slower decline in visual acuity and QoL for patients with GA lesions ≥250 µm from the foveal center. The change in visual acuity and QoL seen with pegcetacoplan treatment for patients with GA lesions <250 µm from the foveal center were within the limits of variability.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.