家谱和口述历史作为时间网络:将whakapapa (Māori家谱)与公历年考古放射性碳日期相结合

IF 1.5 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeometry Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1111/arcm.13074
Isaac H. McIvor, Alan Hogg, Tom Roa, Waikaremoana Waitoki, Gretel Boswijk, Warren Gumbley, Atholl Anderson, Rowan McBride
{"title":"家谱和口述历史作为时间网络:将whakapapa (Māori家谱)与公历年考古放射性碳日期相结合","authors":"Isaac H. McIvor,&nbsp;Alan Hogg,&nbsp;Tom Roa,&nbsp;Waikaremoana Waitoki,&nbsp;Gretel Boswijk,&nbsp;Warren Gumbley,&nbsp;Atholl Anderson,&nbsp;Rowan McBride","doi":"10.1111/arcm.13074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human genealogies serve multiple functions beyond documenting one's pedigree. They operate as complex social frameworks that structure knowledge, delimit group membership, explain historical causation, are political tools, and provide chronological foundations for understanding past events and processes across diverse knowledge systems. Archaeologists, ethnologists, and historians have long related historical information from genealogies and associated histories to solar calendar years. However, unsystematic methodologies, contrasting ontologies, and ethical issues have limited these approaches. In this paper, we review previous attempts at relating human genealogies and associated histories with calendar years. We explain the chronological network approach as a new alternative, including maximum and minimum Gregorian calendar year limits for each event's date estimate. We consider this method capable of greater transparency, adjustment with new information, hypothesis testing, and internally consistent models. The efficacy of the chronological network approach is demonstrated with a case study of Māori genealogies (<i>whakapapa</i>), oral histories (<i>kōrero tuku iho</i>), and radiocarbon dates. Example genealogical date estimates are interfaced with radiocarbon dates of the initial settlement of Aotearoa New Zealand and the advent of fortifications (<i>pā</i>) in the Waikato region. We conclude by discussing the implications and significance concerning Indigenous research methodologies, priorities, and data sovereignty principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":8254,"journal":{"name":"Archaeometry","volume":"67 S1","pages":"131-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/arcm.13074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genealogies and oral histories as chronological networks: interfacing whakapapa (Māori genealogies) with Gregorian calendar year archaeological radiocarbon dates\",\"authors\":\"Isaac H. McIvor,&nbsp;Alan Hogg,&nbsp;Tom Roa,&nbsp;Waikaremoana Waitoki,&nbsp;Gretel Boswijk,&nbsp;Warren Gumbley,&nbsp;Atholl Anderson,&nbsp;Rowan McBride\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/arcm.13074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Human genealogies serve multiple functions beyond documenting one's pedigree. They operate as complex social frameworks that structure knowledge, delimit group membership, explain historical causation, are political tools, and provide chronological foundations for understanding past events and processes across diverse knowledge systems. Archaeologists, ethnologists, and historians have long related historical information from genealogies and associated histories to solar calendar years. However, unsystematic methodologies, contrasting ontologies, and ethical issues have limited these approaches. In this paper, we review previous attempts at relating human genealogies and associated histories with calendar years. We explain the chronological network approach as a new alternative, including maximum and minimum Gregorian calendar year limits for each event's date estimate. We consider this method capable of greater transparency, adjustment with new information, hypothesis testing, and internally consistent models. The efficacy of the chronological network approach is demonstrated with a case study of Māori genealogies (<i>whakapapa</i>), oral histories (<i>kōrero tuku iho</i>), and radiocarbon dates. Example genealogical date estimates are interfaced with radiocarbon dates of the initial settlement of Aotearoa New Zealand and the advent of fortifications (<i>pā</i>) in the Waikato region. We conclude by discussing the implications and significance concerning Indigenous research methodologies, priorities, and data sovereignty principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeometry\",\"volume\":\"67 S1\",\"pages\":\"131-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/arcm.13074\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeometry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类家谱除了记录一个人的家谱之外,还有多种功能。它们作为复杂的社会框架运作,构建知识,划分群体成员,解释历史因果关系,是政治工具,并为理解不同知识系统中的过去事件和过程提供时间基础。考古学家、民族学家和历史学家长期以来都有相关的历史信息,从家谱和相关历史到阳历年。然而,不系统的方法、对立的本体论和伦理问题限制了这些方法。在本文中,我们回顾了以前的尝试,将人类家谱和相关的历史与日历年。我们将时间网络方法解释为一种新的替代方法,包括每个事件日期估计的最大和最小公历年限制。我们认为这种方法能够更大的透明度,调整新的信息,假设检验,和内部一致的模型。通过对Māori家谱(whakapapa)、口述历史(kōrero tuku iho)和放射性碳年代测定的案例研究,证明了时间网络方法的有效性。例如,谱系日期估计与新西兰奥特罗阿最初定居的放射性碳年代和怀卡托地区防御工事(pā)的出现相结合。最后,我们讨论了土著研究方法、优先事项和数据主权原则的含义和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Genealogies and oral histories as chronological networks: interfacing whakapapa (Māori genealogies) with Gregorian calendar year archaeological radiocarbon dates

Genealogies and oral histories as chronological networks: interfacing whakapapa (Māori genealogies) with Gregorian calendar year archaeological radiocarbon dates

Human genealogies serve multiple functions beyond documenting one's pedigree. They operate as complex social frameworks that structure knowledge, delimit group membership, explain historical causation, are political tools, and provide chronological foundations for understanding past events and processes across diverse knowledge systems. Archaeologists, ethnologists, and historians have long related historical information from genealogies and associated histories to solar calendar years. However, unsystematic methodologies, contrasting ontologies, and ethical issues have limited these approaches. In this paper, we review previous attempts at relating human genealogies and associated histories with calendar years. We explain the chronological network approach as a new alternative, including maximum and minimum Gregorian calendar year limits for each event's date estimate. We consider this method capable of greater transparency, adjustment with new information, hypothesis testing, and internally consistent models. The efficacy of the chronological network approach is demonstrated with a case study of Māori genealogies (whakapapa), oral histories (kōrero tuku iho), and radiocarbon dates. Example genealogical date estimates are interfaced with radiocarbon dates of the initial settlement of Aotearoa New Zealand and the advent of fortifications () in the Waikato region. We conclude by discussing the implications and significance concerning Indigenous research methodologies, priorities, and data sovereignty principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeometry
Archaeometry 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Archaeometry is an international research journal covering the application of the physical and biological sciences to archaeology, anthropology and art history. Topics covered include dating methods, artifact studies, mathematical methods, remote sensing techniques, conservation science, environmental reconstruction, biological anthropology and archaeological theory. Papers are expected to have a clear archaeological, anthropological or art historical context, be of the highest scientific standards, and to present data of international relevance. The journal is published on behalf of the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, in association with Gesellschaft für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie, ARCHAEOMETRIE, the Society for Archaeological Sciences (SAS), and Associazione Italian di Archeometria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信