沙鼠叶和果实的抗糖尿病潜能:化学分析辅助的比较研究,体外和计算机研究

IF 4.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
RSC Advances Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1039/D4RA08509D
Ahlam Hashem Elwekeel, Elham Amin, Ahmed M. Sayed and Marwa H. A. Hassan
{"title":"沙鼠叶和果实的抗糖尿病潜能:化学分析辅助的比较研究,体外和计算机研究","authors":"Ahlam Hashem Elwekeel, Elham Amin, Ahmed M. Sayed and Marwa H. A. Hassan","doi":"10.1039/D4RA08509D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >\r\n <em>Abelmoschus esculentus</em> (L.) is an edible plant from the Malvaceae family known for its nutritional value. The phytochemical content and medicinal usefulness of the fruits of this plant have been extensively discussed, but the leaves have not been adequately investigated. The present research provides a comparative study of leaves and fruits in terms of phytochemical content and biological potential. Interestingly, the current findings highlight the higher contents of phenolics and flavonoids in the leaf extracts than in the fruit extracts. The results of GC-MS and LC-HRMS/MS analyses indicated the rich and diverse content of both organs. LC-HRMS/MS analysis allowed the annotation of seventy-four metabolites, with the leaf extract being richer (60 annotated metabolites) than the fruit extract (32 metabolites). Flavonoids, phenolics, and fatty acids were the most predominant classes of the detected metabolites. Remarkably, fatty acid derivatives, coumarins, iridoids, and lignans were reported for the first time in the genus <em>Abelmoschus</em>. The investigation of the potential activities of the two organs concluded that the antioxidant activity of leaves (9.9 ± 0.71 mg AAE per g) is better than that of fruits (7.32 ± 0.91 mg AAE per g). Similarly, the IC<small><sub>50</sub></small> values for the anti-enzymatic activity of the leaf extract (4.47 ± 0.1 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, 3.54 ± 0.08 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, 0.385 ± 0.019 μg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, and 1.044 ± 0.05 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> against α-glucosidase, α-amylase, DPP-4, and lipase enzymes, respectively) were lower than those for the anti-enzymatic activity of the fruit extract (10.4 ± 0.2 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, 6.53 ± 0.15 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, 2.669 ± 0.132 μg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, and 14.66 ± 0.67 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, respectively). Additionally, the molecular docking simulation study concluded the distinct role of flavonoids in the observed bioactivities. In conclusion, <em>A. esculentus</em> leaves, which are considered agriculture waste, show richer metabolic content and more potent activities than the fruits. Therefore, okra leaves should be valued for these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":102,"journal":{"name":"RSC Advances","volume":" 23","pages":" 18292-18309"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/ra/d4ra08509d?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antidiabetic potential of Abelmoschus esculentus leaves and fruits: a comparative study assisted by chemical profiling, in vitro and in silico studies\",\"authors\":\"Ahlam Hashem Elwekeel, Elham Amin, Ahmed M. Sayed and Marwa H. A. Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4RA08509D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >\\r\\n <em>Abelmoschus esculentus</em> (L.) is an edible plant from the Malvaceae family known for its nutritional value. The phytochemical content and medicinal usefulness of the fruits of this plant have been extensively discussed, but the leaves have not been adequately investigated. The present research provides a comparative study of leaves and fruits in terms of phytochemical content and biological potential. Interestingly, the current findings highlight the higher contents of phenolics and flavonoids in the leaf extracts than in the fruit extracts. The results of GC-MS and LC-HRMS/MS analyses indicated the rich and diverse content of both organs. LC-HRMS/MS analysis allowed the annotation of seventy-four metabolites, with the leaf extract being richer (60 annotated metabolites) than the fruit extract (32 metabolites). Flavonoids, phenolics, and fatty acids were the most predominant classes of the detected metabolites. Remarkably, fatty acid derivatives, coumarins, iridoids, and lignans were reported for the first time in the genus <em>Abelmoschus</em>. The investigation of the potential activities of the two organs concluded that the antioxidant activity of leaves (9.9 ± 0.71 mg AAE per g) is better than that of fruits (7.32 ± 0.91 mg AAE per g). Similarly, the IC<small><sub>50</sub></small> values for the anti-enzymatic activity of the leaf extract (4.47 ± 0.1 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, 3.54 ± 0.08 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, 0.385 ± 0.019 μg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, and 1.044 ± 0.05 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> against α-glucosidase, α-amylase, DPP-4, and lipase enzymes, respectively) were lower than those for the anti-enzymatic activity of the fruit extract (10.4 ± 0.2 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, 6.53 ± 0.15 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, 2.669 ± 0.132 μg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, and 14.66 ± 0.67 mg mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, respectively). Additionally, the molecular docking simulation study concluded the distinct role of flavonoids in the observed bioactivities. In conclusion, <em>A. esculentus</em> leaves, which are considered agriculture waste, show richer metabolic content and more potent activities than the fruits. Therefore, okra leaves should be valued for these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSC Advances\",\"volume\":\" 23\",\"pages\":\" 18292-18309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/ra/d4ra08509d?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSC Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ra/d4ra08509d\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Advances","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ra/d4ra08509d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)是锦葵科的一种可食用植物,以其营养价值而闻名。这种植物的果实的化学成分和药用价值已被广泛讨论,但其叶子尚未得到充分的研究。本研究在植物化学成分和生物学潜力方面对叶片和果实进行了比较研究。有趣的是,目前的研究结果强调了叶提取物中酚类物质和类黄酮的含量高于果实提取物。GC-MS和LC-HRMS/MS分析结果表明,两种器官的含量丰富多样。LC-HRMS/MS分析允许注释74种代谢物,其中叶提取物(60种)比果实提取物(32种)更丰富。黄酮类、酚类和脂肪酸是检测到的主要代谢物。值得一提的是,脂肪酸衍生物、香豆素、环烯醚萜和木脂素均为首次报道。结果表明,叶片的抗氧化活性(9.9±0.71 mg AAE / g)优于果实(7.32±0.91 mg AAE / g)。同样,叶提取物对α-葡萄糖苷酶、α-淀粉酶、DPP-4和脂肪酶的IC50值(分别为4.47±0.1 mg mL−1、3.54±0.08 mg mL−1、0.385±0.019 μ mL−1和1.044±0.05 mg mL−1)也低于果实提取物的IC50值(分别为10.4±0.2 mg mL−1、6.53±0.15 mg mL−1、2.669±0.132 μ mL−1和14.66±0.67 mg mL−1)。此外,分子对接模拟研究表明,黄酮类化合物在观察到的生物活性中具有明显的作用。综上所述,被认为是农业废弃物的牛蒡叶具有比果实更丰富的代谢含量和更强的活性。因此,秋葵叶应该受到重视,因为这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Antidiabetic potential of Abelmoschus esculentus leaves and fruits: a comparative study assisted by chemical profiling, in vitro and in silico studies

Antidiabetic potential of Abelmoschus esculentus leaves and fruits: a comparative study assisted by chemical profiling, in vitro and in silico studies

Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) is an edible plant from the Malvaceae family known for its nutritional value. The phytochemical content and medicinal usefulness of the fruits of this plant have been extensively discussed, but the leaves have not been adequately investigated. The present research provides a comparative study of leaves and fruits in terms of phytochemical content and biological potential. Interestingly, the current findings highlight the higher contents of phenolics and flavonoids in the leaf extracts than in the fruit extracts. The results of GC-MS and LC-HRMS/MS analyses indicated the rich and diverse content of both organs. LC-HRMS/MS analysis allowed the annotation of seventy-four metabolites, with the leaf extract being richer (60 annotated metabolites) than the fruit extract (32 metabolites). Flavonoids, phenolics, and fatty acids were the most predominant classes of the detected metabolites. Remarkably, fatty acid derivatives, coumarins, iridoids, and lignans were reported for the first time in the genus Abelmoschus. The investigation of the potential activities of the two organs concluded that the antioxidant activity of leaves (9.9 ± 0.71 mg AAE per g) is better than that of fruits (7.32 ± 0.91 mg AAE per g). Similarly, the IC50 values for the anti-enzymatic activity of the leaf extract (4.47 ± 0.1 mg mL−1, 3.54 ± 0.08 mg mL−1, 0.385 ± 0.019 μg mL−1, and 1.044 ± 0.05 mg mL−1 against α-glucosidase, α-amylase, DPP-4, and lipase enzymes, respectively) were lower than those for the anti-enzymatic activity of the fruit extract (10.4 ± 0.2 mg mL−1, 6.53 ± 0.15 mg mL−1, 2.669 ± 0.132 μg mL−1, and 14.66 ± 0.67 mg mL−1, respectively). Additionally, the molecular docking simulation study concluded the distinct role of flavonoids in the observed bioactivities. In conclusion, A. esculentus leaves, which are considered agriculture waste, show richer metabolic content and more potent activities than the fruits. Therefore, okra leaves should be valued for these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RSC Advances
RSC Advances chemical sciences-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
3116
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal covering all of the chemical sciences, including multidisciplinary and emerging areas. RSC Advances is a gold open access journal allowing researchers free access to research articles, and offering an affordable open access publishing option for authors around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信