工作坊5报告。管理新兴的移动服务,包括重新思考移动即服务(MaaS)

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Corinne Mulley , Kathy Bell
{"title":"工作坊5报告。管理新兴的移动服务,包括重新思考移动即服务(MaaS)","authors":"Corinne Mulley ,&nbsp;Kathy Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Workshop 5 of Thredbo 18 builds on ideas and research suggestions from Workshops 5 and 6 of Thredbo 17 that looked at new service models governing emerging mobility services and micromobility movement in urban transport, respectively. The evidence from papers in this Workshop were grouped into two broad topic areas: the first considered including public transport in developing countries and its competition from other modes; the role of governance in different contexts and geographies; and shared transport for a single mode, and the second relating to developments in Mobility as a Service (MaaS), particularly involving multiservice providers, and its potential in rural and regional areas and for older and disabled persons. The discussions benefitted from embedding in the Strategic – Tactical – Operational (STO) framework. This identified a mismatch between issues that were in the tactical and operational categories and a further mismatch between tactical and strategic where the tactical level is critical in translating strategic objectives into operational activities. In this context it became clear from a number of papers that there was a lack of clarity in governance frameworks (tactical level) leading to an unsurprising lack of clarity in operational activities. Policy recommendations included the promotion of global learning, the growing role for government to work with industry and the expansion of the training portfolios. Future research needs to expand existing governance research, provide more evidence-based evaluations and recognise the larger number of stakeholders involved in providing mobility and accessibility to benefit users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 101576"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workshop 5 Report. Governing emerging mobility services including rethinking Mobility as a Service (MaaS)\",\"authors\":\"Corinne Mulley ,&nbsp;Kathy Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Workshop 5 of Thredbo 18 builds on ideas and research suggestions from Workshops 5 and 6 of Thredbo 17 that looked at new service models governing emerging mobility services and micromobility movement in urban transport, respectively. The evidence from papers in this Workshop were grouped into two broad topic areas: the first considered including public transport in developing countries and its competition from other modes; the role of governance in different contexts and geographies; and shared transport for a single mode, and the second relating to developments in Mobility as a Service (MaaS), particularly involving multiservice providers, and its potential in rural and regional areas and for older and disabled persons. The discussions benefitted from embedding in the Strategic – Tactical – Operational (STO) framework. This identified a mismatch between issues that were in the tactical and operational categories and a further mismatch between tactical and strategic where the tactical level is critical in translating strategic objectives into operational activities. In this context it became clear from a number of papers that there was a lack of clarity in governance frameworks (tactical level) leading to an unsurprising lack of clarity in operational activities. Policy recommendations included the promotion of global learning, the growing role for government to work with industry and the expansion of the training portfolios. Future research needs to expand existing governance research, provide more evidence-based evaluations and recognise the larger number of stakeholders involved in providing mobility and accessibility to benefit users.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000599\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第18次研讨会的第5次研讨会以第17次研讨会的第5次和第6次研讨会的想法和研究建议为基础。第17次研讨会分别研究了管理城市交通中新兴移动服务和微移动运动的新服务模式。本次研讨会论文的证据被分为两大主题领域:第一个被考虑包括发展中国家的公共交通及其与其他方式的竞争;治理在不同背景和地域中的作用;以及单一模式的共享交通,第二个是关于移动即服务(MaaS)的发展,特别是涉及多服务提供商,及其在农村和区域地区以及老年人和残疾人的潜力。讨论受益于嵌入战略-战术-作战(STO)框架。这确定了战术和行动类别问题之间的不匹配,以及战术和战略之间的进一步不匹配,其中战术层面在将战略目标转化为行动活动方面至关重要。在这种情况下,从许多论文中可以清楚地看出,治理框架(战术层面)缺乏明确性导致了运营活动缺乏明确性。​未来的研究需要扩展现有的治理研究,提供更多基于证据的评估,并认识到更多的利益相关者参与提供机动性和可及性以造福用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workshop 5 Report. Governing emerging mobility services including rethinking Mobility as a Service (MaaS)
Workshop 5 of Thredbo 18 builds on ideas and research suggestions from Workshops 5 and 6 of Thredbo 17 that looked at new service models governing emerging mobility services and micromobility movement in urban transport, respectively. The evidence from papers in this Workshop were grouped into two broad topic areas: the first considered including public transport in developing countries and its competition from other modes; the role of governance in different contexts and geographies; and shared transport for a single mode, and the second relating to developments in Mobility as a Service (MaaS), particularly involving multiservice providers, and its potential in rural and regional areas and for older and disabled persons. The discussions benefitted from embedding in the Strategic – Tactical – Operational (STO) framework. This identified a mismatch between issues that were in the tactical and operational categories and a further mismatch between tactical and strategic where the tactical level is critical in translating strategic objectives into operational activities. In this context it became clear from a number of papers that there was a lack of clarity in governance frameworks (tactical level) leading to an unsurprising lack of clarity in operational activities. Policy recommendations included the promotion of global learning, the growing role for government to work with industry and the expansion of the training portfolios. Future research needs to expand existing governance research, provide more evidence-based evaluations and recognise the larger number of stakeholders involved in providing mobility and accessibility to benefit users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信