Seismic risk assessment of code-noncompliant reinforced concrete frames using spectrum-consistent fragility fuses and nonlinear hazard

Seismic risk assessment of code-noncompliant reinforced concrete (RC) frames faces significant challenges due to structural heterogeneity and the complex interplay of site-specific hazard conditions. This study aims to introduce a novel framework that integrates three key concepts specifically targeting these challenges. Central to the methodology are fragility fuses, which employ a triplet of curves—lower bound, median, and upper bound—to rigorously quantify within-class variability in seismic performance, offering a more nuanced representation of code-noncompliant building behavior compared to conventional single-curve approaches. Complementing this, spectrum-consistent transformations dynamically adjust fragility curves to account for regional spectral shapes and soil categories, ensuring site-specific accuracy by reconciling hazard intensity with local geotechnical conditions. Further enhancing precision, the framework adopts a nonlinear hazard model that captures the curvature of hazard curves in log-log space, overcoming the oversimplifications of linear approximations and significantly improving risk estimates for rare, high-intensity events. Applied to four RC frame typologies (2–5 stories) with diverse geometries and material properties, the framework demonstrates a 15–40 % reduction in risk estimation errors through nonlinear hazard modeling, while spectrum-consistent adjustments show up to 30 % variability in exceedance probabilities across soil classes. Fragility fuses further highlight the impact of structural heterogeneity, with older, non-ductile frames exhibiting 25 % wider confidence intervals in performance. Finally, risk maps are presented for the four frame typologies, making use of non-linear hazard curves and spectrum-consistent fragility fuses accounting for both local effects and within-typology variability.