透明质酸纳米凝胶喷雾治疗口干的疗效:一项随机交叉研究

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
NONGNAPAT EAKPUNYAKUL , PEERAWAS KOPONGPANICH , KANOKPORN BHALANG , JITTIMA AMIE LUCKANAGUL
{"title":"透明质酸纳米凝胶喷雾治疗口干的疗效:一项随机交叉研究","authors":"NONGNAPAT EAKPUNYAKUL ,&nbsp;PEERAWAS KOPONGPANICH ,&nbsp;KANOKPORN BHALANG ,&nbsp;JITTIMA AMIE LUCKANAGUL","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of Hy-N spray in dry mouth patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A randomized double-blind crossover study was conducted on patients with dry mouth. They were given 3 saliva substitute sprays: Hy-N, placebo, and Biotène. The unstimulated whole saliva flow rate (UWSFR), salivary pH, and xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) were evaluated at baseline and after 1 week of treatment with each spray. Patient satisfaction was evaluated after each treatment period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-nine patients completed the study. After using the Hy-N and Biotène sprays for 1 week, the UWSFR significantly increased from 0.12 ± 0.16 at baseline to 0.16 ± 0.18 mL/min postspray usage (<em>P</em> = .04, <em>P</em> ≤ .01) with moderate improvement. None of the sprays affected salivary pH (<em>P</em> = .72). The mean XQ score also significantly decreased from 34.2 ± 21.4 at baseline to 23.7 ± 17.4, 23.1 ± 15.2, and 26.5 ± 17.7 after using Hy-N, Biotène, and placebo spray, respectively (<em>P</em> = .001, <em>P</em> = .011, <em>P</em> = .009) with moderate improvement. Biotène was the most preferred saliva substitute spray, followed by Hy-N spray.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using the Hy-N and Biotène for 1 week relieves subjective and objective dry mouth. They can be a useful product in the management of dry mouth without causing side-effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"25 3","pages":"Article 102142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFICACY OF HYALURONIC NANOGEL SPRAY FOR TREATING DRY MOUTH: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER STUDY\",\"authors\":\"NONGNAPAT EAKPUNYAKUL ,&nbsp;PEERAWAS KOPONGPANICH ,&nbsp;KANOKPORN BHALANG ,&nbsp;JITTIMA AMIE LUCKANAGUL\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of Hy-N spray in dry mouth patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A randomized double-blind crossover study was conducted on patients with dry mouth. They were given 3 saliva substitute sprays: Hy-N, placebo, and Biotène. The unstimulated whole saliva flow rate (UWSFR), salivary pH, and xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) were evaluated at baseline and after 1 week of treatment with each spray. Patient satisfaction was evaluated after each treatment period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-nine patients completed the study. After using the Hy-N and Biotène sprays for 1 week, the UWSFR significantly increased from 0.12 ± 0.16 at baseline to 0.16 ± 0.18 mL/min postspray usage (<em>P</em> = .04, <em>P</em> ≤ .01) with moderate improvement. None of the sprays affected salivary pH (<em>P</em> = .72). The mean XQ score also significantly decreased from 34.2 ± 21.4 at baseline to 23.7 ± 17.4, 23.1 ± 15.2, and 26.5 ± 17.7 after using Hy-N, Biotène, and placebo spray, respectively (<em>P</em> = .001, <em>P</em> = .011, <em>P</em> = .009) with moderate improvement. Biotène was the most preferred saliva substitute spray, followed by Hy-N spray.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using the Hy-N and Biotène for 1 week relieves subjective and objective dry mouth. They can be a useful product in the management of dry mouth without causing side-effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 102142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338225000570\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338225000570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价Hy-N喷雾剂治疗口干患者的疗效。材料与方法对口干患者进行随机双盲交叉研究。给予3种唾液替代喷雾剂:Hy-N、安慰剂和biot。在基线和每次喷雾治疗1周后评估非刺激全唾液流率(UWSFR)、唾液pH值和口干问卷(XQ)。每个治疗期结束后评估患者满意度。结果29例患者完成了研究。使用Hy-N和biot喷雾剂1周后,UWSFR从基线时的0.12±0.16显著增加到喷雾剂使用后的0.16±0.18 mL/min (P = )。04, P≤0.01),有中度改善。喷雾剂均不影响唾液pH值(P = .72)。使用Hy-N、biot和安慰剂喷雾后,XQ平均评分也从基线时的34.2±21.4显著降低至23.7±17.4、23.1±15.2和26.5±17.7 (P = )。001, P = 。011, P = .009),有中度改善。biot是首选的唾液替代喷雾剂,其次是Hy-N喷雾剂。结论hyn联合biot治疗1周可缓解主客观口干症状。它们是治疗口干的有效产品,而且不会产生副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFICACY OF HYALURONIC NANOGEL SPRAY FOR TREATING DRY MOUTH: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER STUDY

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of Hy-N spray in dry mouth patients.

Materials and Methods

A randomized double-blind crossover study was conducted on patients with dry mouth. They were given 3 saliva substitute sprays: Hy-N, placebo, and Biotène. The unstimulated whole saliva flow rate (UWSFR), salivary pH, and xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) were evaluated at baseline and after 1 week of treatment with each spray. Patient satisfaction was evaluated after each treatment period.

Results

Twenty-nine patients completed the study. After using the Hy-N and Biotène sprays for 1 week, the UWSFR significantly increased from 0.12 ± 0.16 at baseline to 0.16 ± 0.18 mL/min postspray usage (P = .04, P ≤ .01) with moderate improvement. None of the sprays affected salivary pH (P = .72). The mean XQ score also significantly decreased from 34.2 ± 21.4 at baseline to 23.7 ± 17.4, 23.1 ± 15.2, and 26.5 ± 17.7 after using Hy-N, Biotène, and placebo spray, respectively (P = .001, P = .011, P = .009) with moderate improvement. Biotène was the most preferred saliva substitute spray, followed by Hy-N spray.

Conclusion

Using the Hy-N and Biotène for 1 week relieves subjective and objective dry mouth. They can be a useful product in the management of dry mouth without causing side-effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信