土壤pH调节氨基肥料对陆地生态系统氮循环微生物基因的影响

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Xue Zhou, Yiyun Chen, Yawei Li
{"title":"土壤pH调节氨基肥料对陆地生态系统氮循环微生物基因的影响","authors":"Xue Zhou,&nbsp;Yiyun Chen,&nbsp;Yawei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2025.103735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increase in available nitrogen (N) in terrestrial ecosystems influences N-cycling processes by affecting the abundance of N-cycling microorganisms. However, the responses of N-cycling genes to different N forms and soil pH conditions remain inconsistent. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the responses of the abundances of functional genes (archaeal <em>amoA</em>, bacterial <em>amoA</em>, <em>narG</em>, <em>nirK</em>, <em>nirS</em>, and <em>nosZ</em>) involved in nitrification and denitrification to exogenous N inputs. Our analysis included 325 observations from 116 publications on terrestrial ecosystems. Elevated N inputs significantly increased the abundances of AOA (+24.6 %), AOB (+103 %), <em>nirS</em> (+31.2 %), <em>nirK</em> (+26.4 %), and <em>nosZ</em> (+24.0 %) genes. The effects of different N forms on N-cycling genes were modulated by soil pH. The response of AOB to N addition was significant across various N forms and a wide range of soil pH levels. In contrast, the strongest effects of inorganic N and urea on AOA were observed in alkaline and neutral soils, respectively, while organic fertilizers had the greatest impact on AOA in acidic soils. The response of the <em>nirS</em> gene to organic N addition was evident across a broad range of soil pH, whereas the <em>nirK</em> gene responded primarily in acidic and neutral soils. In neutral soils, inorganic N similarly influenced the abundances of <em>nirS</em> and <em>nirK</em> genes; however, in acidic soils, inorganic N significantly reduced <em>nirS</em> gene abundance while increasing that of <em>nirK</em>. Urea significantly enhanced the abundances of <em>nirS</em> and <em>nirK</em> genes in acidic and neutral soils, respectively. Moreover, organic and inorganic N markedly increased <em>nosZ</em> gene abundance in neutral and alkaline soils, whereas urea had no significant effect on <em>nosZ</em>. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the responses of N-cycling genes to various N forms across soils with differing pH levels, offering valuable insights to refine strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving N management in terrestrial ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 103735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil pH modulates the impact of ammonia-based fertilizers on N-cycling microbial genes in terrestrial ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Xue Zhou,&nbsp;Yiyun Chen,&nbsp;Yawei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2025.103735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increase in available nitrogen (N) in terrestrial ecosystems influences N-cycling processes by affecting the abundance of N-cycling microorganisms. However, the responses of N-cycling genes to different N forms and soil pH conditions remain inconsistent. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the responses of the abundances of functional genes (archaeal <em>amoA</em>, bacterial <em>amoA</em>, <em>narG</em>, <em>nirK</em>, <em>nirS</em>, and <em>nosZ</em>) involved in nitrification and denitrification to exogenous N inputs. Our analysis included 325 observations from 116 publications on terrestrial ecosystems. Elevated N inputs significantly increased the abundances of AOA (+24.6 %), AOB (+103 %), <em>nirS</em> (+31.2 %), <em>nirK</em> (+26.4 %), and <em>nosZ</em> (+24.0 %) genes. The effects of different N forms on N-cycling genes were modulated by soil pH. The response of AOB to N addition was significant across various N forms and a wide range of soil pH levels. In contrast, the strongest effects of inorganic N and urea on AOA were observed in alkaline and neutral soils, respectively, while organic fertilizers had the greatest impact on AOA in acidic soils. The response of the <em>nirS</em> gene to organic N addition was evident across a broad range of soil pH, whereas the <em>nirK</em> gene responded primarily in acidic and neutral soils. In neutral soils, inorganic N similarly influenced the abundances of <em>nirS</em> and <em>nirK</em> genes; however, in acidic soils, inorganic N significantly reduced <em>nirS</em> gene abundance while increasing that of <em>nirK</em>. Urea significantly enhanced the abundances of <em>nirS</em> and <em>nirK</em> genes in acidic and neutral soils, respectively. Moreover, organic and inorganic N markedly increased <em>nosZ</em> gene abundance in neutral and alkaline soils, whereas urea had no significant effect on <em>nosZ</em>. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the responses of N-cycling genes to various N forms across soils with differing pH levels, offering valuable insights to refine strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving N management in terrestrial ecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556325000275\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556325000275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

陆地生态系统有效氮(N)的增加通过影响氮循环微生物的丰度来影响氮循环过程。然而,氮素循环基因对不同氮素形态和土壤pH条件的响应并不一致。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估参与硝化和反硝化的功能基因(古菌amoA、细菌amoA、narG、nirK、nirS和nosZ)丰度对外源N输入的响应。我们的分析包括来自116份陆地生态系统出版物的325项观测结果。氮输入增加显著增加了AOA(+ 24.6%)、AOB(+ 103%)、nirS(+ 31.2%)、nirK(+ 26.4%)和nosZ(+ 24.0%)基因的丰度。不同氮素形态对氮循环基因的影响受土壤pH的调节。在不同氮素形态和土壤pH水平范围内,AOB对N添加的响应显著。无机氮和尿素对酸性土壤AOA的影响最大,而有机肥对酸性土壤AOA的影响最大。nirS基因对有机氮添加的响应在很大的土壤pH范围内都很明显,而nirK基因主要对酸性和中性土壤有响应。在中性土壤中,无机氮同样影响nirS和nirK基因的丰度;而在酸性土壤中,无机氮显著降低了nirS基因丰度,提高了nirK基因丰度。尿素显著提高了酸性土壤和中性土壤中nirS和nirK基因的丰度。有机氮和无机氮显著增加了中性和碱性土壤nosZ基因丰度,而尿素对nosZ无显著影响。该荟萃分析提供了对不同pH水平土壤中N循环基因对各种N形态的响应的全面了解,为完善减少温室气体排放和改善陆地生态系统N管理的策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil pH modulates the impact of ammonia-based fertilizers on N-cycling microbial genes in terrestrial ecosystems
The increase in available nitrogen (N) in terrestrial ecosystems influences N-cycling processes by affecting the abundance of N-cycling microorganisms. However, the responses of N-cycling genes to different N forms and soil pH conditions remain inconsistent. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the responses of the abundances of functional genes (archaeal amoA, bacterial amoA, narG, nirK, nirS, and nosZ) involved in nitrification and denitrification to exogenous N inputs. Our analysis included 325 observations from 116 publications on terrestrial ecosystems. Elevated N inputs significantly increased the abundances of AOA (+24.6 %), AOB (+103 %), nirS (+31.2 %), nirK (+26.4 %), and nosZ (+24.0 %) genes. The effects of different N forms on N-cycling genes were modulated by soil pH. The response of AOB to N addition was significant across various N forms and a wide range of soil pH levels. In contrast, the strongest effects of inorganic N and urea on AOA were observed in alkaline and neutral soils, respectively, while organic fertilizers had the greatest impact on AOA in acidic soils. The response of the nirS gene to organic N addition was evident across a broad range of soil pH, whereas the nirK gene responded primarily in acidic and neutral soils. In neutral soils, inorganic N similarly influenced the abundances of nirS and nirK genes; however, in acidic soils, inorganic N significantly reduced nirS gene abundance while increasing that of nirK. Urea significantly enhanced the abundances of nirS and nirK genes in acidic and neutral soils, respectively. Moreover, organic and inorganic N markedly increased nosZ gene abundance in neutral and alkaline soils, whereas urea had no significant effect on nosZ. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the responses of N-cycling genes to various N forms across soils with differing pH levels, offering valuable insights to refine strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving N management in terrestrial ecosystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信