{"title":"低坡山墙屋顶上光伏板的风致荷载:板尺寸效应","authors":"Mahmoud Abdallah , Ioannis Zisis","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the aerodynamic performance of photovoltaic (PV) panels mounted on gable roofs, examining the effects of panel size, orientation (portrait vs. landscape), and coverage (full vs. partial) on wind-induced loads. Twelve configurations were tested at the NHERI Wall of Wind Experimental Facility to assess PV panel wind load distributions. Results indicate that small and medium panel arrays in landscape orientation exhibit deeper mean and peak uplift (more negative <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>C</mi><mi>f</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) than in portrait, whereas large arrays show negligible orientation dependence. Larger panel arrays—especially when installed in landscape orientation with full roof coverage—generally exhibit lower uplift coefficients (normalized per unit area) and smoother pressure distributions than smaller ones. In contrast, portrait orientation reduces overall uplift but may concentrate wind loads along vertical edges, occasionally leading to higher localized suctions under oblique winds. Area-averaged suction coefficients only occasionally exceeded ASCE 7–22 thresholds, while positive pressure forces frequently surpassed design limits, particularly for small and medium panels in landscape orientation and under both full and partial coverage. These findings underscore the importance of refining ASCE standards to better capture the aerodynamic behavior of PV panels with varying sizes and orientations. Future research should explore other roof types and slopes to support broader codification of PV wind load design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 106129"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wind-induced loads on photovoltaic (PV) panels on low-sloped gable roofs: Panel size effects\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Abdallah , Ioannis Zisis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluates the aerodynamic performance of photovoltaic (PV) panels mounted on gable roofs, examining the effects of panel size, orientation (portrait vs. landscape), and coverage (full vs. partial) on wind-induced loads. Twelve configurations were tested at the NHERI Wall of Wind Experimental Facility to assess PV panel wind load distributions. Results indicate that small and medium panel arrays in landscape orientation exhibit deeper mean and peak uplift (more negative <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>C</mi><mi>f</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) than in portrait, whereas large arrays show negligible orientation dependence. Larger panel arrays—especially when installed in landscape orientation with full roof coverage—generally exhibit lower uplift coefficients (normalized per unit area) and smoother pressure distributions than smaller ones. In contrast, portrait orientation reduces overall uplift but may concentrate wind loads along vertical edges, occasionally leading to higher localized suctions under oblique winds. Area-averaged suction coefficients only occasionally exceeded ASCE 7–22 thresholds, while positive pressure forces frequently surpassed design limits, particularly for small and medium panels in landscape orientation and under both full and partial coverage. These findings underscore the importance of refining ASCE standards to better capture the aerodynamic behavior of PV panels with varying sizes and orientations. Future research should explore other roof types and slopes to support broader codification of PV wind load design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"263 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525001254\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525001254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Wind-induced loads on photovoltaic (PV) panels on low-sloped gable roofs: Panel size effects
This study evaluates the aerodynamic performance of photovoltaic (PV) panels mounted on gable roofs, examining the effects of panel size, orientation (portrait vs. landscape), and coverage (full vs. partial) on wind-induced loads. Twelve configurations were tested at the NHERI Wall of Wind Experimental Facility to assess PV panel wind load distributions. Results indicate that small and medium panel arrays in landscape orientation exhibit deeper mean and peak uplift (more negative ) than in portrait, whereas large arrays show negligible orientation dependence. Larger panel arrays—especially when installed in landscape orientation with full roof coverage—generally exhibit lower uplift coefficients (normalized per unit area) and smoother pressure distributions than smaller ones. In contrast, portrait orientation reduces overall uplift but may concentrate wind loads along vertical edges, occasionally leading to higher localized suctions under oblique winds. Area-averaged suction coefficients only occasionally exceeded ASCE 7–22 thresholds, while positive pressure forces frequently surpassed design limits, particularly for small and medium panels in landscape orientation and under both full and partial coverage. These findings underscore the importance of refining ASCE standards to better capture the aerodynamic behavior of PV panels with varying sizes and orientations. Future research should explore other roof types and slopes to support broader codification of PV wind load design.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects.
Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.