迈向南非生态可持续的电力组合:评估可再生能源和核能的政策影响

IF 4.4 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Chinazaekpere Nwani, Philip Chimobi Omoke
{"title":"迈向南非生态可持续的电力组合:评估可再生能源和核能的政策影响","authors":"Chinazaekpere Nwani,&nbsp;Philip Chimobi Omoke","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving a balance between meeting rising electricity demands and minimizing ecological impact is essential for advancing sustainability goals. Using dynamic and Kernel-based simulation techniques, we evaluate the effects of renewable and nuclear energy on ecological load capacity factor (EL) in South Africa from 1985 to 2022. The findings reveal that fossil-fuel-based electricity generation negatively impacts EL, while a transition to low-carbon energy, particularly renewables, offers significant ecological benefits. In contrast, nuclear energy shows minimal and statistically insignificant benefits. These findings call for targeted incentives to boost investments in renewable infrastructure and strategies for managing nuclear safety and waste.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an ecologically sustainable electricity mix in South Africa: Evaluating the policy implications of renewable and nuclear energy\",\"authors\":\"Chinazaekpere Nwani,&nbsp;Philip Chimobi Omoke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Achieving a balance between meeting rising electricity demands and minimizing ecological impact is essential for advancing sustainability goals. Using dynamic and Kernel-based simulation techniques, we evaluate the effects of renewable and nuclear energy on ecological load capacity factor (EL) in South Africa from 1985 to 2022. The findings reveal that fossil-fuel-based electricity generation negatively impacts EL, while a transition to low-carbon energy, particularly renewables, offers significant ecological benefits. In contrast, nuclear energy shows minimal and statistically insignificant benefits. These findings call for targeted incentives to boost investments in renewable infrastructure and strategies for managing nuclear safety and waste.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000876\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在满足不断增长的电力需求和尽量减少生态影响之间取得平衡,对于推进可持续发展目标至关重要。利用动态和基于核的模拟技术,我们评估了1985 - 2022年南非可再生能源和核能对生态负荷能力因子(EL)的影响。研究结果表明,以化石燃料为基础的发电对低碳能源产生负面影响,而向低碳能源,特别是可再生能源的过渡,提供了显著的生态效益。相比之下,核能所显示的效益微乎其微,而且在统计上微不足道。这些发现呼吁采取有针对性的激励措施,促进对可再生基础设施的投资,并制定管理核安全和核废料的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards an ecologically sustainable electricity mix in South Africa: Evaluating the policy implications of renewable and nuclear energy
Achieving a balance between meeting rising electricity demands and minimizing ecological impact is essential for advancing sustainability goals. Using dynamic and Kernel-based simulation techniques, we evaluate the effects of renewable and nuclear energy on ecological load capacity factor (EL) in South Africa from 1985 to 2022. The findings reveal that fossil-fuel-based electricity generation negatively impacts EL, while a transition to low-carbon energy, particularly renewables, offers significant ecological benefits. In contrast, nuclear energy shows minimal and statistically insignificant benefits. These findings call for targeted incentives to boost investments in renewable infrastructure and strategies for managing nuclear safety and waste.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信