氢气生产的技术经济评估:光伏/风能混合系统中电解槽技术的比较分析

IF 8.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Asmae Berrada , Mohammad J. Sanjari , Rachid El Mrabet
{"title":"氢气生产的技术经济评估:光伏/风能混合系统中电解槽技术的比较分析","authors":"Asmae Berrada ,&nbsp;Mohammad J. Sanjari ,&nbsp;Rachid El Mrabet","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green hydrogen is critical for achieving net-zero emissions, with water electrolysis offering a CO<sub>2</sub>-free solution. This study provides a comprehensive comparative financial and economic assessment of a hybrid PV/wind hydrogen production system using three types of electrolysers, including Alkaline Electrolyser (AEL), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyser (PEMEL), and Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOEL). Key performance metrics such as net present value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), revenues, Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Earning Before Taxes (EBT), Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR), and levelized cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) are evaluated to identify the most cost-effective option. The findings reveal that AEL is the most economical solution, achieving a higher NPV (503,374 k€) and IRR (16.94 % for project IRR), though PEMEL and SOEL remain competitive. Other metrics, such as DSCR, show that the hydrogen project generates 30 % more cash flow than is required to cover its debt service. Additionally, the results of the LCOH analysis demonstrate that a hybrid plant consisting of 10 % PV and 90 % wind is more cost-effective in the studied region than both solar-based or wind-based hydrogen production plants. AEL and PEMEL are approximately 7–6 €/kg less expensive than SOEL, but this gap is expected to be narrowed by 2030. The hybrid renewable energy project reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 6786.6 Mt over its lifetime. These findings guide policymakers and investors toward scalable, cost-effective green hydrogen deployment, emphasizing the synergy of hybrid renewables and mature electrolysis technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":337,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","volume":"141 ","pages":"Pages 193-211"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production: Comparative analysis of electrolyser technologies in a hybrid PV/wind system\",\"authors\":\"Asmae Berrada ,&nbsp;Mohammad J. Sanjari ,&nbsp;Rachid El Mrabet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green hydrogen is critical for achieving net-zero emissions, with water electrolysis offering a CO<sub>2</sub>-free solution. This study provides a comprehensive comparative financial and economic assessment of a hybrid PV/wind hydrogen production system using three types of electrolysers, including Alkaline Electrolyser (AEL), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyser (PEMEL), and Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOEL). Key performance metrics such as net present value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), revenues, Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Earning Before Taxes (EBT), Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR), and levelized cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) are evaluated to identify the most cost-effective option. The findings reveal that AEL is the most economical solution, achieving a higher NPV (503,374 k€) and IRR (16.94 % for project IRR), though PEMEL and SOEL remain competitive. Other metrics, such as DSCR, show that the hydrogen project generates 30 % more cash flow than is required to cover its debt service. Additionally, the results of the LCOH analysis demonstrate that a hybrid plant consisting of 10 % PV and 90 % wind is more cost-effective in the studied region than both solar-based or wind-based hydrogen production plants. AEL and PEMEL are approximately 7–6 €/kg less expensive than SOEL, but this gap is expected to be narrowed by 2030. The hybrid renewable energy project reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 6786.6 Mt over its lifetime. These findings guide policymakers and investors toward scalable, cost-effective green hydrogen deployment, emphasizing the synergy of hybrid renewables and mature electrolysis technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 193-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925026989\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925026989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色氢对于实现净零排放至关重要,水电解提供了一种无二氧化碳的解决方案。本研究对使用碱性电解槽(AEL)、质子交换膜电解槽(PEMEL)和固体氧化物电解槽(SOEL)三种电解槽的光伏/风能混合制氢系统进行了全面的财务和经济比较评估。评估净现值(NPV)、内部收益率(IRR)、收入、息税折旧及摊销前利润(EBITDA)、税前利润(EBT)、偿债覆盖率(DSCR)和氢气平化成本(LCOH)等关键绩效指标,以确定最具成本效益的选择。研究结果显示,尽管PEMEL和SOEL仍然具有竞争力,但AEL是最经济的解决方案,实现了更高的NPV (503,374 k€)和IRR(项目IRR的16.94%)。DSCR等其他指标显示,氢气项目产生的现金流比偿还债务所需的现金流多30%。此外,LCOH分析的结果表明,在研究地区,由10%的光伏和90%的风能组成的混合电厂比太阳能或风能制氢厂更具成本效益。AEL和PEMEL比SOEL便宜约7-6欧元/公斤,但预计到2030年这一差距将缩小。混合可再生能源项目在其生命周期内减少了6.7866亿吨二氧化碳排放量。这些发现指导政策制定者和投资者朝着可扩展的、具有成本效益的绿色氢部署方向发展,强调混合可再生能源和成熟电解技术的协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production: Comparative analysis of electrolyser technologies in a hybrid PV/wind system
Green hydrogen is critical for achieving net-zero emissions, with water electrolysis offering a CO2-free solution. This study provides a comprehensive comparative financial and economic assessment of a hybrid PV/wind hydrogen production system using three types of electrolysers, including Alkaline Electrolyser (AEL), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyser (PEMEL), and Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOEL). Key performance metrics such as net present value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), revenues, Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Earning Before Taxes (EBT), Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR), and levelized cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) are evaluated to identify the most cost-effective option. The findings reveal that AEL is the most economical solution, achieving a higher NPV (503,374 k€) and IRR (16.94 % for project IRR), though PEMEL and SOEL remain competitive. Other metrics, such as DSCR, show that the hydrogen project generates 30 % more cash flow than is required to cover its debt service. Additionally, the results of the LCOH analysis demonstrate that a hybrid plant consisting of 10 % PV and 90 % wind is more cost-effective in the studied region than both solar-based or wind-based hydrogen production plants. AEL and PEMEL are approximately 7–6 €/kg less expensive than SOEL, but this gap is expected to be narrowed by 2030. The hybrid renewable energy project reduces CO2 emissions by 6786.6 Mt over its lifetime. These findings guide policymakers and investors toward scalable, cost-effective green hydrogen deployment, emphasizing the synergy of hybrid renewables and mature electrolysis technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 工程技术-环境科学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
3502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The objective of the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy is to facilitate the exchange of new ideas, technological advancements, and research findings in the field of Hydrogen Energy among scientists and engineers worldwide. This journal showcases original research, both analytical and experimental, covering various aspects of Hydrogen Energy. These include production, storage, transmission, utilization, enabling technologies, environmental impact, economic considerations, and global perspectives on hydrogen and its carriers such as NH3, CH4, alcohols, etc. The utilization aspect encompasses various methods such as thermochemical (combustion), photochemical, electrochemical (fuel cells), and nuclear conversion of hydrogen, hydrogen isotopes, and hydrogen carriers into thermal, mechanical, and electrical energies. The applications of these energies can be found in transportation (including aerospace), industrial, commercial, and residential sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信