Asmae Berrada , Mohammad J. Sanjari , Rachid El Mrabet
{"title":"氢气生产的技术经济评估:光伏/风能混合系统中电解槽技术的比较分析","authors":"Asmae Berrada , Mohammad J. Sanjari , Rachid El Mrabet","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green hydrogen is critical for achieving net-zero emissions, with water electrolysis offering a CO<sub>2</sub>-free solution. This study provides a comprehensive comparative financial and economic assessment of a hybrid PV/wind hydrogen production system using three types of electrolysers, including Alkaline Electrolyser (AEL), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyser (PEMEL), and Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOEL). Key performance metrics such as net present value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), revenues, Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Earning Before Taxes (EBT), Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR), and levelized cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) are evaluated to identify the most cost-effective option. The findings reveal that AEL is the most economical solution, achieving a higher NPV (503,374 k€) and IRR (16.94 % for project IRR), though PEMEL and SOEL remain competitive. Other metrics, such as DSCR, show that the hydrogen project generates 30 % more cash flow than is required to cover its debt service. Additionally, the results of the LCOH analysis demonstrate that a hybrid plant consisting of 10 % PV and 90 % wind is more cost-effective in the studied region than both solar-based or wind-based hydrogen production plants. AEL and PEMEL are approximately 7–6 €/kg less expensive than SOEL, but this gap is expected to be narrowed by 2030. The hybrid renewable energy project reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 6786.6 Mt over its lifetime. These findings guide policymakers and investors toward scalable, cost-effective green hydrogen deployment, emphasizing the synergy of hybrid renewables and mature electrolysis technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":337,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","volume":"141 ","pages":"Pages 193-211"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production: Comparative analysis of electrolyser technologies in a hybrid PV/wind system\",\"authors\":\"Asmae Berrada , Mohammad J. Sanjari , Rachid El Mrabet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green hydrogen is critical for achieving net-zero emissions, with water electrolysis offering a CO<sub>2</sub>-free solution. This study provides a comprehensive comparative financial and economic assessment of a hybrid PV/wind hydrogen production system using three types of electrolysers, including Alkaline Electrolyser (AEL), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyser (PEMEL), and Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOEL). Key performance metrics such as net present value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), revenues, Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Earning Before Taxes (EBT), Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR), and levelized cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) are evaluated to identify the most cost-effective option. The findings reveal that AEL is the most economical solution, achieving a higher NPV (503,374 k€) and IRR (16.94 % for project IRR), though PEMEL and SOEL remain competitive. Other metrics, such as DSCR, show that the hydrogen project generates 30 % more cash flow than is required to cover its debt service. Additionally, the results of the LCOH analysis demonstrate that a hybrid plant consisting of 10 % PV and 90 % wind is more cost-effective in the studied region than both solar-based or wind-based hydrogen production plants. AEL and PEMEL are approximately 7–6 €/kg less expensive than SOEL, but this gap is expected to be narrowed by 2030. The hybrid renewable energy project reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 6786.6 Mt over its lifetime. These findings guide policymakers and investors toward scalable, cost-effective green hydrogen deployment, emphasizing the synergy of hybrid renewables and mature electrolysis technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 193-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925026989\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925026989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production: Comparative analysis of electrolyser technologies in a hybrid PV/wind system
Green hydrogen is critical for achieving net-zero emissions, with water electrolysis offering a CO2-free solution. This study provides a comprehensive comparative financial and economic assessment of a hybrid PV/wind hydrogen production system using three types of electrolysers, including Alkaline Electrolyser (AEL), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyser (PEMEL), and Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOEL). Key performance metrics such as net present value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), revenues, Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Earning Before Taxes (EBT), Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR), and levelized cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) are evaluated to identify the most cost-effective option. The findings reveal that AEL is the most economical solution, achieving a higher NPV (503,374 k€) and IRR (16.94 % for project IRR), though PEMEL and SOEL remain competitive. Other metrics, such as DSCR, show that the hydrogen project generates 30 % more cash flow than is required to cover its debt service. Additionally, the results of the LCOH analysis demonstrate that a hybrid plant consisting of 10 % PV and 90 % wind is more cost-effective in the studied region than both solar-based or wind-based hydrogen production plants. AEL and PEMEL are approximately 7–6 €/kg less expensive than SOEL, but this gap is expected to be narrowed by 2030. The hybrid renewable energy project reduces CO2 emissions by 6786.6 Mt over its lifetime. These findings guide policymakers and investors toward scalable, cost-effective green hydrogen deployment, emphasizing the synergy of hybrid renewables and mature electrolysis technologies.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy is to facilitate the exchange of new ideas, technological advancements, and research findings in the field of Hydrogen Energy among scientists and engineers worldwide. This journal showcases original research, both analytical and experimental, covering various aspects of Hydrogen Energy. These include production, storage, transmission, utilization, enabling technologies, environmental impact, economic considerations, and global perspectives on hydrogen and its carriers such as NH3, CH4, alcohols, etc.
The utilization aspect encompasses various methods such as thermochemical (combustion), photochemical, electrochemical (fuel cells), and nuclear conversion of hydrogen, hydrogen isotopes, and hydrogen carriers into thermal, mechanical, and electrical energies. The applications of these energies can be found in transportation (including aerospace), industrial, commercial, and residential sectors.