GPT-4在口腔颌面外科委员会考试中的表现:专业问题的挑战。

Felix Benjamin Warwas, Nils Heim
{"title":"GPT-4在口腔颌面外科委员会考试中的表现:专业问题的挑战。","authors":"Felix Benjamin Warwas, Nils Heim","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01412-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of GPT-4 in answering oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) board exam questions, given its success in other medical specializations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 250 multiple-choice questions were randomly selected from an established OMFS question bank, covering a broad range of topics such as craniofacial trauma, oncological procedures, orthognathic surgery, and general surgical principles. GPT-4's responses were assessed for accuracy, and statistical analysis was performed to compare its performance across different topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4 achieved an overall accuracy of 62% in answering the OMFS board exam questions. The highest accuracies were observed in Pharmacology (92.8%), Anatomy (73.3%), and Mucosal Lesions (70.8%). Conversely, the lowest accuracies were noted in Dental Implants (37.5%), Orthognathic Surgery (38.5%), and Reconstructive Surgery (42.9%). Statistical analysis indicated significant variability in performance across different topics, with GPT-4 performing better in general topics compared to specialized ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPT-4 demonstrates a promising ability to answer OMFS board exam questions, particularly in general medical topics. However, its performance in highly specialized areas reveals significant limitations. These findings suggest that while GPT-4 can be a useful tool in medical education, further enhancements are needed for its application in specialized medical fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of GPT-4 in oral and maxillofacial surgery board exams: challenges in specialized questions.\",\"authors\":\"Felix Benjamin Warwas, Nils Heim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-025-01412-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of GPT-4 in answering oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) board exam questions, given its success in other medical specializations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 250 multiple-choice questions were randomly selected from an established OMFS question bank, covering a broad range of topics such as craniofacial trauma, oncological procedures, orthognathic surgery, and general surgical principles. GPT-4's responses were assessed for accuracy, and statistical analysis was performed to compare its performance across different topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4 achieved an overall accuracy of 62% in answering the OMFS board exam questions. The highest accuracies were observed in Pharmacology (92.8%), Anatomy (73.3%), and Mucosal Lesions (70.8%). Conversely, the lowest accuracies were noted in Dental Implants (37.5%), Orthognathic Surgery (38.5%), and Reconstructive Surgery (42.9%). Statistical analysis indicated significant variability in performance across different topics, with GPT-4 performing better in general topics compared to specialized ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPT-4 demonstrates a promising ability to answer OMFS board exam questions, particularly in general medical topics. However, its performance in highly specialized areas reveals significant limitations. These findings suggest that while GPT-4 can be a useful tool in medical education, further enhancements are needed for its application in specialized medical fields.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01412-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01412-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估GPT-4在回答口腔颌面外科(OMFS)委员会考试问题中的表现,鉴于其在其他医学专业的成功。方法:从已建立的OMFS题库中随机抽取250道选择题,涵盖广泛的主题,如颅面创伤、肿瘤手术、正颌手术和一般外科原理。对GPT-4的回答进行准确性评估,并进行统计分析以比较其在不同主题中的表现。结果:GPT-4在回答OMFS委员会考试问题时达到62%的总体准确性。准确率最高的是药理学(92.8%)、解剖学(73.3%)和粘膜病变(70.8%)。相反,种植牙(37.5%)、正颌手术(38.5%)和重建手术(42.9%)的准确率最低。统计分析表明,不同主题的表现存在显著差异,GPT-4在一般主题上的表现优于专门主题。结论:GPT-4表现出很好的回答OMFS委员会考试问题的能力,特别是在一般医学主题方面。然而,它在高度专业化领域的表现显示出明显的局限性。这些发现表明,虽然GPT-4可以作为医学教育的有用工具,但在专业医学领域的应用还需要进一步加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of GPT-4 in oral and maxillofacial surgery board exams: challenges in specialized questions.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of GPT-4 in answering oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) board exam questions, given its success in other medical specializations.

Methods: A total of 250 multiple-choice questions were randomly selected from an established OMFS question bank, covering a broad range of topics such as craniofacial trauma, oncological procedures, orthognathic surgery, and general surgical principles. GPT-4's responses were assessed for accuracy, and statistical analysis was performed to compare its performance across different topics.

Results: GPT-4 achieved an overall accuracy of 62% in answering the OMFS board exam questions. The highest accuracies were observed in Pharmacology (92.8%), Anatomy (73.3%), and Mucosal Lesions (70.8%). Conversely, the lowest accuracies were noted in Dental Implants (37.5%), Orthognathic Surgery (38.5%), and Reconstructive Surgery (42.9%). Statistical analysis indicated significant variability in performance across different topics, with GPT-4 performing better in general topics compared to specialized ones.

Conclusion: GPT-4 demonstrates a promising ability to answer OMFS board exam questions, particularly in general medical topics. However, its performance in highly specialized areas reveals significant limitations. These findings suggest that while GPT-4 can be a useful tool in medical education, further enhancements are needed for its application in specialized medical fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信