EXPRESS:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、保留比例肺功能受损(PRISm)和全因死亡率:一项基于社区的前瞻性研究。

IF 2
Yuhan Wang, Mengcan Wang, Beini Zhou, Wuriliga Yue, Ke Hu
{"title":"EXPRESS:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、保留比例肺功能受损(PRISm)和全因死亡率:一项基于社区的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Yuhan Wang, Mengcan Wang, Beini Zhou, Wuriliga Yue, Ke Hu","doi":"10.1177/10815589251348913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) has not been well studied. This prospective cohort study enrolled 3408 adults aged 20-79 years without airflow obstruction. The median follow-up time was 11.8 years. Probable OSA (pOSA) was defined based on symptoms (snore, snort/stop breathing, sleepy) and was divided into a normal lung function group (FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted) and a PRISm group (FEV1 < 80% predicted) according to spirometry. Multivariable regression was used to analyze the association between pOSA and PRISm, and Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to assess the effects of pOSA alone, PRISm alone, and both on the risk of mortality. All analyses used survey weights. At baseline, 28.5% of participants presented with pOSA, and 11.4% had PRISm. Multivariable analysis showed an independent association between pOSA and PRISm (adjusted OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.94, p = 0.04). Individuals with comorbid pOSA and PRISm had the highest risk of death (adjusted HR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.55-3.55) compared with individuals with PRISm alone (adjusted HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.3-2.44), while individuals with pOSA alone were not significantly associated with death (adjusted p = 0.893). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed significant survival differences between the groups (p < 0.0001). Our results show that individuals with suspected OSA are associated with a higher prevalence of PRISm and individuals with comorbid OSA and PRISm have a higher risk of all-cause death. Although the limitations of the observational study do not allow us to determine causality, it emphasizes that the association between OSA and PRISm deserves further in-depth study.</p>","PeriodicalId":520677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","volume":" ","pages":"10815589251348913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstructive sleep apnea, preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), and all-cause mortality: a community-based prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuhan Wang, Mengcan Wang, Beini Zhou, Wuriliga Yue, Ke Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10815589251348913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) has not been well studied. This prospective cohort study enrolled 3408 adults aged 20-79 years without airflow obstruction. The median follow-up time was 11.8 years. Probable OSA (pOSA) was defined based on symptoms (snore, snort/stop breathing, sleepy) and was divided into a normal lung function group (FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted) and a PRISm group (FEV1 < 80% predicted) according to spirometry. Multivariable regression was used to analyze the association between pOSA and PRISm, and Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to assess the effects of pOSA alone, PRISm alone, and both on the risk of mortality. All analyses used survey weights. At baseline, 28.5% of participants presented with pOSA, and 11.4% had PRISm. Multivariable analysis showed an independent association between pOSA and PRISm (adjusted OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.94, p = 0.04). Individuals with comorbid pOSA and PRISm had the highest risk of death (adjusted HR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.55-3.55) compared with individuals with PRISm alone (adjusted HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.3-2.44), while individuals with pOSA alone were not significantly associated with death (adjusted p = 0.893). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed significant survival differences between the groups (p < 0.0001). Our results show that individuals with suspected OSA are associated with a higher prevalence of PRISm and individuals with comorbid OSA and PRISm have a higher risk of all-cause death. Although the limitations of the observational study do not allow us to determine causality, it emphasizes that the association between OSA and PRISm deserves further in-depth study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10815589251348913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589251348913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589251348913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与保留比肺功能受损(PRISm)之间的关系尚未得到很好的研究。这项前瞻性队列研究招募了3408名年龄在20-79岁之间无气流阻塞的成年人。中位随访时间为11.8年。根据症状(打鼾、呼出/呼吸停止、困倦)定义疑似OSA (pOSA),并分为肺功能正常组(FEV1≥预测的80%)和PRISm组(FEV1)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstructive sleep apnea, preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), and all-cause mortality: a community-based prospective study.

The association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) has not been well studied. This prospective cohort study enrolled 3408 adults aged 20-79 years without airflow obstruction. The median follow-up time was 11.8 years. Probable OSA (pOSA) was defined based on symptoms (snore, snort/stop breathing, sleepy) and was divided into a normal lung function group (FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted) and a PRISm group (FEV1 < 80% predicted) according to spirometry. Multivariable regression was used to analyze the association between pOSA and PRISm, and Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to assess the effects of pOSA alone, PRISm alone, and both on the risk of mortality. All analyses used survey weights. At baseline, 28.5% of participants presented with pOSA, and 11.4% had PRISm. Multivariable analysis showed an independent association between pOSA and PRISm (adjusted OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.94, p = 0.04). Individuals with comorbid pOSA and PRISm had the highest risk of death (adjusted HR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.55-3.55) compared with individuals with PRISm alone (adjusted HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.3-2.44), while individuals with pOSA alone were not significantly associated with death (adjusted p = 0.893). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed significant survival differences between the groups (p < 0.0001). Our results show that individuals with suspected OSA are associated with a higher prevalence of PRISm and individuals with comorbid OSA and PRISm have a higher risk of all-cause death. Although the limitations of the observational study do not allow us to determine causality, it emphasizes that the association between OSA and PRISm deserves further in-depth study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信