认知-语言联合康复干预的临床疗效:来自希腊卒中性失语症患者的证据。

Eugenia Sabbidou, Lambros Messinis, Grigorios Nasios, Anastasia Nousia, Triantafyllos Doskas, Sonia Malefaki, Aikaterini Ntoskou, Anna Alexandropoulou, Nikolaos Grigoriadis
{"title":"认知-语言联合康复干预的临床疗效:来自希腊卒中性失语症患者的证据。","authors":"Eugenia Sabbidou, Lambros Messinis, Grigorios Nasios, Anastasia Nousia, Triantafyllos Doskas, Sonia Malefaki, Aikaterini Ntoskou, Anna Alexandropoulou, Nikolaos Grigoriadis","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to implement a novel intervention program integrating cognitive remediation and traditional speech and language therapy (SLT) in persons with aphasia (PWA) and to assess the effectiveness of this combined program in improving aphasic deficits.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PWA following stroke were assigned to one of two study groups. In the combined treatment group (CTG; n = 12), participants were treated with traditional SLT and computerized cognitive training utilizing the Rehacom rehabilitation software, while the SLT group (SLTG; n = 10) received only traditional SLT targeting both speech comprehension and expression. Both groups underwent 40-min sessions twice a week for 2 months. Participants' cognitive and language skills were assessed pre- and post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, groups were matched on age and educational level. Between-group comparisons indicated better performance in favor of the CTG on a set-shifting task (p = .019) and on naming and word repetition (p = .013 and p = .031, respectively) post-treatment. Within-group analysis revealed that performance on naming improved in both groups (p < .001 for CTG and p = .003 for SLTG). The CTG also significantly improved post-treatment in set-shifting (p = .020), while the SLTG also showed significant improvement on automatic speech (p = .046) and processing speed (p = .012) post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that the combined intervention was more efficacious than SLT alone on naming, repetition, and set-shifting tasks in this clinical group.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of a Combined Cognitive-Language Rehabilitation Intervention: Evidence From Greek Patients With Stroke-Induced Aphasia.\",\"authors\":\"Eugenia Sabbidou, Lambros Messinis, Grigorios Nasios, Anastasia Nousia, Triantafyllos Doskas, Sonia Malefaki, Aikaterini Ntoskou, Anna Alexandropoulou, Nikolaos Grigoriadis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acaf046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to implement a novel intervention program integrating cognitive remediation and traditional speech and language therapy (SLT) in persons with aphasia (PWA) and to assess the effectiveness of this combined program in improving aphasic deficits.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PWA following stroke were assigned to one of two study groups. In the combined treatment group (CTG; n = 12), participants were treated with traditional SLT and computerized cognitive training utilizing the Rehacom rehabilitation software, while the SLT group (SLTG; n = 10) received only traditional SLT targeting both speech comprehension and expression. Both groups underwent 40-min sessions twice a week for 2 months. Participants' cognitive and language skills were assessed pre- and post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, groups were matched on age and educational level. Between-group comparisons indicated better performance in favor of the CTG on a set-shifting task (p = .019) and on naming and word repetition (p = .013 and p = .031, respectively) post-treatment. Within-group analysis revealed that performance on naming improved in both groups (p < .001 for CTG and p = .003 for SLTG). The CTG also significantly improved post-treatment in set-shifting (p = .020), while the SLTG also showed significant improvement on automatic speech (p = .046) and processing speed (p = .012) post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that the combined intervention was more efficacious than SLT alone on naming, repetition, and set-shifting tasks in this clinical group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是在失语症患者(PWA)中实施一种结合认知修复和传统言语和语言治疗(SLT)的新型干预方案,并评估这种联合方案在改善失语症缺陷方面的有效性。方法:卒中后PWA分为两组。联合治疗组(CTG;n = 12),参与者接受传统的SLT和利用Rehacom康复软件的计算机化认知训练,而SLT组(SLTG;n = 10)只接受针对语音理解和表达的传统语言辅助训练。两组患者每周进行两次40分钟的训练,持续2个月。参与者的认知和语言能力在治疗前后被评估。结果:在基线时,各组在年龄和教育水平上匹配。组间比较表明,CTG在集合转移任务(p = 0.019)和命名和单词重复任务(p = 0.019)上表现更好。013和p =。031)后处理。组内分析显示,两组在命名方面的表现都有所改善(p)。结论:我们的结果表明,在该临床组中,联合干预在命名、重复和设置转移任务方面比单独使用SLT更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Efficacy of a Combined Cognitive-Language Rehabilitation Intervention: Evidence From Greek Patients With Stroke-Induced Aphasia.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to implement a novel intervention program integrating cognitive remediation and traditional speech and language therapy (SLT) in persons with aphasia (PWA) and to assess the effectiveness of this combined program in improving aphasic deficits.

Method: PWA following stroke were assigned to one of two study groups. In the combined treatment group (CTG; n = 12), participants were treated with traditional SLT and computerized cognitive training utilizing the Rehacom rehabilitation software, while the SLT group (SLTG; n = 10) received only traditional SLT targeting both speech comprehension and expression. Both groups underwent 40-min sessions twice a week for 2 months. Participants' cognitive and language skills were assessed pre- and post-treatment.

Results: At baseline, groups were matched on age and educational level. Between-group comparisons indicated better performance in favor of the CTG on a set-shifting task (p = .019) and on naming and word repetition (p = .013 and p = .031, respectively) post-treatment. Within-group analysis revealed that performance on naming improved in both groups (p < .001 for CTG and p = .003 for SLTG). The CTG also significantly improved post-treatment in set-shifting (p = .020), while the SLTG also showed significant improvement on automatic speech (p = .046) and processing speed (p = .012) post-treatment.

Conclusions: Our results indicated that the combined intervention was more efficacious than SLT alone on naming, repetition, and set-shifting tasks in this clinical group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信