体育裁判心理学。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
David J. Hancock , Alexandra Pizzera
{"title":"体育裁判心理学。","authors":"David J. Hancock ,&nbsp;Alexandra Pizzera","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sport officials are key actors in organized and competitive sports. With numerous required tasks (e.g., attending to athlete safety and applying fair decisions), sport officials must possess several competencies including appropriate positioning, adequate fitness, excellent rule knowledge, and contextual judgement. To enhance the consistency and quality of sport officiating performances, psychological skills are also required. The purpose of this article is to broadly review the research as it pertains to the psychology of sport officiating. After outlining sport officials' roles, we describe relevant models and theories that have been applied to sport officiating research—some of which are specific to sport officials, while others are drawn from general psychology. Following, we provide insights on key studies that form the evidence base for understanding sport officials' psychology, including mental skills, motivation, group dynamics, communication, and decision-making. The final section offers direction to future researchers to overcome some of the challenges in this field. These challenges include relatively few studies on sport officials from individual sports, a lack of demographic diversity among the studied sport officials, little investigation into sport officials’ mental skills, and minimal theories that exist to predict and explain the psychology of sport officiating. Collectively, we hope this article not only inspires more research on the psychology of sport officiating, but also offers strategic direction to future researchers to ensure meaningful studies in this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The psychology of sport officiating\",\"authors\":\"David J. Hancock ,&nbsp;Alexandra Pizzera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sport officials are key actors in organized and competitive sports. With numerous required tasks (e.g., attending to athlete safety and applying fair decisions), sport officials must possess several competencies including appropriate positioning, adequate fitness, excellent rule knowledge, and contextual judgement. To enhance the consistency and quality of sport officiating performances, psychological skills are also required. The purpose of this article is to broadly review the research as it pertains to the psychology of sport officiating. After outlining sport officials' roles, we describe relevant models and theories that have been applied to sport officiating research—some of which are specific to sport officials, while others are drawn from general psychology. Following, we provide insights on key studies that form the evidence base for understanding sport officials' psychology, including mental skills, motivation, group dynamics, communication, and decision-making. The final section offers direction to future researchers to overcome some of the challenges in this field. These challenges include relatively few studies on sport officials from individual sports, a lack of demographic diversity among the studied sport officials, little investigation into sport officials’ mental skills, and minimal theories that exist to predict and explain the psychology of sport officiating. Collectively, we hope this article not only inspires more research on the psychology of sport officiating, but also offers strategic direction to future researchers to ensure meaningful studies in this field.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225000986\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225000986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体育官员是有组织的竞技体育的关键角色。由于需要完成许多任务(例如,关注运动员的安全和公平决策),体育官员必须具备几种能力,包括适当的定位,足够的健康,出色的规则知识和上下文判断。为了提高体育裁判表现的一致性和质量,还需要心理技巧。本文的目的是对有关体育裁判心理的研究进行综述。在概述了体育官员的角色之后,我们描述了已经应用于体育裁判研究的相关模型和理论——其中一些是专门针对体育官员的,而另一些则是从一般心理学中得出的。接下来,我们提供了对关键研究的见解,这些研究构成了理解体育官员心理的证据基础,包括心理技能、招募和保留、群体动力学、沟通和决策。最后一节为未来的研究人员提供了克服该领域一些挑战的方向。这些挑战包括相对较少的从单项运动中对体育官员的研究,所研究的体育官员缺乏人口多样性,对体育官员心理技能的调查很少,以及现有的预测和解释体育裁判心理的理论很少。综上所述,我们希望本文不仅能对体育裁判心理学的研究起到启发作用,也能为未来的研究者提供战略方向,以确保这一领域的研究有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The psychology of sport officiating
Sport officials are key actors in organized and competitive sports. With numerous required tasks (e.g., attending to athlete safety and applying fair decisions), sport officials must possess several competencies including appropriate positioning, adequate fitness, excellent rule knowledge, and contextual judgement. To enhance the consistency and quality of sport officiating performances, psychological skills are also required. The purpose of this article is to broadly review the research as it pertains to the psychology of sport officiating. After outlining sport officials' roles, we describe relevant models and theories that have been applied to sport officiating research—some of which are specific to sport officials, while others are drawn from general psychology. Following, we provide insights on key studies that form the evidence base for understanding sport officials' psychology, including mental skills, motivation, group dynamics, communication, and decision-making. The final section offers direction to future researchers to overcome some of the challenges in this field. These challenges include relatively few studies on sport officials from individual sports, a lack of demographic diversity among the studied sport officials, little investigation into sport officials’ mental skills, and minimal theories that exist to predict and explain the psychology of sport officiating. Collectively, we hope this article not only inspires more research on the psychology of sport officiating, but also offers strategic direction to future researchers to ensure meaningful studies in this field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
172
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信