利用同伴教育者增加黑人男性前列腺癌基因检测:一项随机对照试验的结果。

A E Leader, J Blanding Godbolt, N Crumpler, L Gross, R Hartman, S W Keith, V N Giri
{"title":"利用同伴教育者增加黑人男性前列腺癌基因检测:一项随机对照试验的结果。","authors":"A E Leader, J Blanding Godbolt, N Crumpler, L Gross, R Hartman, S W Keith, V N Giri","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black males have low rates of genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCa). Peer-based strategies have not been tested for PCa genetic testing. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a peer-based educational intervention about PCa genetic testing for Black males in a community setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Black males, ages 35 to 69, were randomized to either a group-based discussion led by a peer educator who explained PCA and the risks and benefits of genetic testing or standard informational materials with no interaction with a peer educator. Participants completed baseline and endpoint surveys and were connected to free PCA genetic testing if interested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty (n=130) Black males enrolled in the study. There were increases in knowledge (9.5% increase, intervention arm; 8.1% increase, control arm; p=0.98) and decreases in decisional conflict (-0.4 change, intervention arm; -0.4 change, control arm; p=0.95) in both study arms. Males in the intervention arm had increased intentions to seek PCA genetic counseling while males in the control arm tended to have decreased intentions (p=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While educational materials may be sufficient to impart knowledge about PCA, more complex decisions like genetic testing may benefit from the support of individuals with similar lived experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":94375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing peer educators to increase genetic testing for prostate cancer among black males: results of a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"A E Leader, J Blanding Godbolt, N Crumpler, L Gross, R Hartman, S W Keith, V N Giri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black males have low rates of genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCa). Peer-based strategies have not been tested for PCa genetic testing. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a peer-based educational intervention about PCa genetic testing for Black males in a community setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Black males, ages 35 to 69, were randomized to either a group-based discussion led by a peer educator who explained PCA and the risks and benefits of genetic testing or standard informational materials with no interaction with a peer educator. Participants completed baseline and endpoint surveys and were connected to free PCA genetic testing if interested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty (n=130) Black males enrolled in the study. There were increases in knowledge (9.5% increase, intervention arm; 8.1% increase, control arm; p=0.98) and decreases in decisional conflict (-0.4 change, intervention arm; -0.4 change, control arm; p=0.95) in both study arms. Males in the intervention arm had increased intentions to seek PCA genetic counseling while males in the control arm tended to have decreased intentions (p=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While educational materials may be sufficient to impart knowledge about PCA, more complex decisions like genetic testing may benefit from the support of individuals with similar lived experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黑人男性前列腺癌(PCa)基因检测率较低。以同伴为基础的策略尚未被用于前列腺癌基因检测。我们的目的是评估社区环境中黑人男性前列腺癌基因检测的同伴教育干预的影响。方法:年龄在35岁到69岁之间的黑人男性被随机分为两组,一组由解释PCA和基因检测的风险和益处的同伴教育者领导的小组讨论,另一组没有与同伴教育者互动的标准信息材料。参与者完成基线和终点调查,如果感兴趣,可以免费进行PCA基因检测。结果:130名(n=130)黑人男性参加了这项研究。知识有所增加(干预组增加9.5%;控制臂增加8.1%;P =0.98),决策冲突减少(干预组-0.4变化;-0.4变化,控制臂;P =0.95)。干预组男性寻求PCA遗传咨询的意愿增加,而对照组男性寻求PCA遗传咨询的意愿减少(p=0.06)。结论:虽然教育材料可能足以传授有关PCA的知识,但更复杂的决策,如基因检测,可能受益于具有类似生活经历的个人的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing peer educators to increase genetic testing for prostate cancer among black males: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Black males have low rates of genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCa). Peer-based strategies have not been tested for PCa genetic testing. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a peer-based educational intervention about PCa genetic testing for Black males in a community setting.

Methods: Black males, ages 35 to 69, were randomized to either a group-based discussion led by a peer educator who explained PCA and the risks and benefits of genetic testing or standard informational materials with no interaction with a peer educator. Participants completed baseline and endpoint surveys and were connected to free PCA genetic testing if interested.

Results: One hundred and thirty (n=130) Black males enrolled in the study. There were increases in knowledge (9.5% increase, intervention arm; 8.1% increase, control arm; p=0.98) and decreases in decisional conflict (-0.4 change, intervention arm; -0.4 change, control arm; p=0.95) in both study arms. Males in the intervention arm had increased intentions to seek PCA genetic counseling while males in the control arm tended to have decreased intentions (p=0.06).

Conclusion: While educational materials may be sufficient to impart knowledge about PCA, more complex decisions like genetic testing may benefit from the support of individuals with similar lived experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信