A E Leader, J Blanding Godbolt, N Crumpler, L Gross, R Hartman, S W Keith, V N Giri
{"title":"利用同伴教育者增加黑人男性前列腺癌基因检测:一项随机对照试验的结果。","authors":"A E Leader, J Blanding Godbolt, N Crumpler, L Gross, R Hartman, S W Keith, V N Giri","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black males have low rates of genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCa). Peer-based strategies have not been tested for PCa genetic testing. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a peer-based educational intervention about PCa genetic testing for Black males in a community setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Black males, ages 35 to 69, were randomized to either a group-based discussion led by a peer educator who explained PCA and the risks and benefits of genetic testing or standard informational materials with no interaction with a peer educator. Participants completed baseline and endpoint surveys and were connected to free PCA genetic testing if interested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty (n=130) Black males enrolled in the study. There were increases in knowledge (9.5% increase, intervention arm; 8.1% increase, control arm; p=0.98) and decreases in decisional conflict (-0.4 change, intervention arm; -0.4 change, control arm; p=0.95) in both study arms. Males in the intervention arm had increased intentions to seek PCA genetic counseling while males in the control arm tended to have decreased intentions (p=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While educational materials may be sufficient to impart knowledge about PCA, more complex decisions like genetic testing may benefit from the support of individuals with similar lived experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":94375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing peer educators to increase genetic testing for prostate cancer among black males: results of a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"A E Leader, J Blanding Godbolt, N Crumpler, L Gross, R Hartman, S W Keith, V N Giri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black males have low rates of genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCa). Peer-based strategies have not been tested for PCa genetic testing. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a peer-based educational intervention about PCa genetic testing for Black males in a community setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Black males, ages 35 to 69, were randomized to either a group-based discussion led by a peer educator who explained PCA and the risks and benefits of genetic testing or standard informational materials with no interaction with a peer educator. Participants completed baseline and endpoint surveys and were connected to free PCA genetic testing if interested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty (n=130) Black males enrolled in the study. There were increases in knowledge (9.5% increase, intervention arm; 8.1% increase, control arm; p=0.98) and decreases in decisional conflict (-0.4 change, intervention arm; -0.4 change, control arm; p=0.95) in both study arms. Males in the intervention arm had increased intentions to seek PCA genetic counseling while males in the control arm tended to have decreased intentions (p=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While educational materials may be sufficient to impart knowledge about PCA, more complex decisions like genetic testing may benefit from the support of individuals with similar lived experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilizing peer educators to increase genetic testing for prostate cancer among black males: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Black males have low rates of genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCa). Peer-based strategies have not been tested for PCa genetic testing. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a peer-based educational intervention about PCa genetic testing for Black males in a community setting.
Methods: Black males, ages 35 to 69, were randomized to either a group-based discussion led by a peer educator who explained PCA and the risks and benefits of genetic testing or standard informational materials with no interaction with a peer educator. Participants completed baseline and endpoint surveys and were connected to free PCA genetic testing if interested.
Results: One hundred and thirty (n=130) Black males enrolled in the study. There were increases in knowledge (9.5% increase, intervention arm; 8.1% increase, control arm; p=0.98) and decreases in decisional conflict (-0.4 change, intervention arm; -0.4 change, control arm; p=0.95) in both study arms. Males in the intervention arm had increased intentions to seek PCA genetic counseling while males in the control arm tended to have decreased intentions (p=0.06).
Conclusion: While educational materials may be sufficient to impart knowledge about PCA, more complex decisions like genetic testing may benefit from the support of individuals with similar lived experiences.