在美国,与低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查相关的多层次因素。

Tung-Sung Tseng, Chien-Ching Li, Hui-Yi Lin, Kelsey N Witmeier, Chaoyi Zeng, Yu-Wen Chiu, Michael D Celestin, Edward J Trapido
{"title":"在美国,与低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查相关的多层次因素。","authors":"Tung-Sung Tseng, Chien-Ching Li, Hui-Yi Lin, Kelsey N Witmeier, Chaoyi Zeng, Yu-Wen Chiu, Michael D Celestin, Edward J Trapido","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is recommended for high-risk smokers to decrease lung cancer-related mortality and increase prognosis. In the U.S., the uptake of LDCT screening among eligible smokers is suboptimal. The impacts of social-environmental and individual factors on LDCT screening uptake using nationally representative dataset recommendations are understudied. The current study investigated multi-level factors associated with LDCT screening using national data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2017-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, social determinants of health (SDOH) and other state-level variables (Medicaid expansion status and the number of screening facilities using American Lung Association (ALA) 's State of Lung Cancer) were applied. Our study outcome variance was LDCT screening among study participants who met the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for lung cancer screening. The final study sample consisted of 15640 respondents from 29 states. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex sampling design applied in BRFSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall utilization rate of LDCT screening is only 18.4%. The LDCT screening rate varied by state (6.2 -31.1%). LDCT screen rates were not significantly associated with the number of lung cancer screening facilities (r=0.02, p=0.909) but were positively associated with the number of lung cancer screening facilities per 10,000 smokers (r=0.67, p<0.001). Among the respondents, individuals who were employed, never married, reported good health status, did not have primary care physicians, economic concerns like low income, did not have routine checkups, and did not have certain chronic conditions (i.e. cancer, asthma, COPD) had a lower utilization rate of LDCT screening compared with their counterpart.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of LDCT screening among eligible smokers remains low. Enhancing access to care for high-risk individuals, promoting services to diverse racial and socioeconomic groups, and expanding Medicaid coverage to incorporate annual LDCT screening can be used to guide future lung cancer screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-level factors associated with low dose computed tomography lung cancer screening in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Tung-Sung Tseng, Chien-Ching Li, Hui-Yi Lin, Kelsey N Witmeier, Chaoyi Zeng, Yu-Wen Chiu, Michael D Celestin, Edward J Trapido\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is recommended for high-risk smokers to decrease lung cancer-related mortality and increase prognosis. In the U.S., the uptake of LDCT screening among eligible smokers is suboptimal. The impacts of social-environmental and individual factors on LDCT screening uptake using nationally representative dataset recommendations are understudied. The current study investigated multi-level factors associated with LDCT screening using national data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2017-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, social determinants of health (SDOH) and other state-level variables (Medicaid expansion status and the number of screening facilities using American Lung Association (ALA) 's State of Lung Cancer) were applied. Our study outcome variance was LDCT screening among study participants who met the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for lung cancer screening. The final study sample consisted of 15640 respondents from 29 states. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex sampling design applied in BRFSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall utilization rate of LDCT screening is only 18.4%. The LDCT screening rate varied by state (6.2 -31.1%). LDCT screen rates were not significantly associated with the number of lung cancer screening facilities (r=0.02, p=0.909) but were positively associated with the number of lung cancer screening facilities per 10,000 smokers (r=0.67, p<0.001). Among the respondents, individuals who were employed, never married, reported good health status, did not have primary care physicians, economic concerns like low income, did not have routine checkups, and did not have certain chronic conditions (i.e. cancer, asthma, COPD) had a lower utilization rate of LDCT screening compared with their counterpart.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of LDCT screening among eligible smokers remains low. Enhancing access to care for high-risk individuals, promoting services to diverse racial and socioeconomic groups, and expanding Medicaid coverage to incorporate annual LDCT screening can be used to guide future lung cancer screening programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建议对高危吸烟者进行低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查,以降低肺癌相关死亡率,提高预后。在美国,在符合条件的吸烟者中,LDCT筛查的采用是次优的。社会环境和个人因素对LDCT筛查使用全国代表性数据集建议的影响尚未得到充分研究。目前的研究使用国家数据调查了与LDCT筛查相关的多层次因素。方法:2017-2021年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据、健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和其他州级变量(医疗补助扩张状况和使用美国肺脏协会(ALA)的筛查设施数量)。的肺癌状态)。我们的研究结果差异是在符合美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查指南的研究参与者中进行LDCT筛查。最终的研究样本包括来自29个州的15640名受访者。所有的分析都被加权,以解释BRFSS中应用的复杂抽样设计。结果:LDCT筛查总体利用率仅为18.4%。LDCT筛查率因州而异(6.2 -31.1%)。LDCT筛查率与肺癌筛查设施数量无显著相关(r=0.02, p=0.909),但与每万名吸烟者肺癌筛查设施数量呈正相关(r=0.67, p)。结论:LDCT筛查在符合条件的吸烟者中的使用率仍然很低。加强对高危人群的护理,促进对不同种族和社会经济群体的服务,扩大医疗补助覆盖范围以纳入年度LDCT筛查,这些都可以用来指导未来的肺癌筛查项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-level factors associated with low dose computed tomography lung cancer screening in the United States.

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is recommended for high-risk smokers to decrease lung cancer-related mortality and increase prognosis. In the U.S., the uptake of LDCT screening among eligible smokers is suboptimal. The impacts of social-environmental and individual factors on LDCT screening uptake using nationally representative dataset recommendations are understudied. The current study investigated multi-level factors associated with LDCT screening using national data.

Methods: The 2017-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, social determinants of health (SDOH) and other state-level variables (Medicaid expansion status and the number of screening facilities using American Lung Association (ALA) 's State of Lung Cancer) were applied. Our study outcome variance was LDCT screening among study participants who met the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for lung cancer screening. The final study sample consisted of 15640 respondents from 29 states. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex sampling design applied in BRFSS.

Results: The overall utilization rate of LDCT screening is only 18.4%. The LDCT screening rate varied by state (6.2 -31.1%). LDCT screen rates were not significantly associated with the number of lung cancer screening facilities (r=0.02, p=0.909) but were positively associated with the number of lung cancer screening facilities per 10,000 smokers (r=0.67, p<0.001). Among the respondents, individuals who were employed, never married, reported good health status, did not have primary care physicians, economic concerns like low income, did not have routine checkups, and did not have certain chronic conditions (i.e. cancer, asthma, COPD) had a lower utilization rate of LDCT screening compared with their counterpart.

Conclusion: The use of LDCT screening among eligible smokers remains low. Enhancing access to care for high-risk individuals, promoting services to diverse racial and socioeconomic groups, and expanding Medicaid coverage to incorporate annual LDCT screening can be used to guide future lung cancer screening programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信