在阿根廷的一家专科医院,对非传统适应症长期使用非典型抗精神病药物时监测心脏代谢风险的困难:一项定性研究。

María N Vivacqua, María F Grande Ratti, José L Faccioli
{"title":"在阿根廷的一家专科医院,对非传统适应症长期使用非典型抗精神病药物时监测心脏代谢风险的困难:一项定性研究。","authors":"María N Vivacqua, María F Grande Ratti, José L Faccioli","doi":"10.24875/ACM.24000120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the barriers that hinder the proper monitoring of adverse effects in patients prescribed antipsychotics in a medical specialty hospital in Argentina.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative interpretive study of narrative design with ten semi-structured individual interviews with doctors from various specialties, conducted in outpatient clinics between May and November 2022, with an ad hoc guide based on a bibliography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers in interpersonal relationships emerged, highlighting the insufficient duration and infrequent consultations, communication problems between professionals and between professionals and their patients, and difficulties in teamwork. The obstacles were related to 1) limited direct communication; 2) communication via electronic medical records (without prior agreement or confirmation of receipt of messages); 3) use of patients as intermediaries for message exchange; 4) disregarding another professional's indications without communicating with them; 5) expressing differing criteria to the patient, delegating responsibility for treatment decisions to the patient; 6) assuming that antipsychotic monitoring is carried out by another professional; 7) hierarchies that hinder communication, and 8) experienced medical referents. These topics relate to inherent healthcare system issues, mainly the lack of available time and communication between colleagues as an unpaid task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Communication barriers imposed by the healthcare system can result in misunderstandings that lead to suboptimal health outcomes. Sharing this information could guide organizations in developing strategies to improve communication and facilitate teamwork in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93885,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":"95 2","pages":"154-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difficulties in monitoring cardiometabolic risk in the chronic use of atypical antipsychotics for non-traditional indications, in a specialty hospital in Argentina: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"María N Vivacqua, María F Grande Ratti, José L Faccioli\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/ACM.24000120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the barriers that hinder the proper monitoring of adverse effects in patients prescribed antipsychotics in a medical specialty hospital in Argentina.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative interpretive study of narrative design with ten semi-structured individual interviews with doctors from various specialties, conducted in outpatient clinics between May and November 2022, with an ad hoc guide based on a bibliography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers in interpersonal relationships emerged, highlighting the insufficient duration and infrequent consultations, communication problems between professionals and between professionals and their patients, and difficulties in teamwork. The obstacles were related to 1) limited direct communication; 2) communication via electronic medical records (without prior agreement or confirmation of receipt of messages); 3) use of patients as intermediaries for message exchange; 4) disregarding another professional's indications without communicating with them; 5) expressing differing criteria to the patient, delegating responsibility for treatment decisions to the patient; 6) assuming that antipsychotic monitoring is carried out by another professional; 7) hierarchies that hinder communication, and 8) experienced medical referents. These topics relate to inherent healthcare system issues, mainly the lack of available time and communication between colleagues as an unpaid task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Communication barriers imposed by the healthcare system can result in misunderstandings that lead to suboptimal health outcomes. Sharing this information could guide organizations in developing strategies to improve communication and facilitate teamwork in hospital settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"volume\":\"95 2\",\"pages\":\"154-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.24000120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.24000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨阿根廷某医学专科医院对抗精神病药物不良反应进行正确监测的障碍。方法:采用基于参考书目的临时指南,在2022年5月至11月期间在门诊对不同专业的医生进行了10次半结构化的个人访谈,对叙事设计进行了定性解释研究。结果:人际关系出现障碍,突出表现为就诊时间不够长,就诊次数少,专业人员之间、专业人员与患者之间存在沟通问题,团队合作困难。这些障碍与1)有限的直接沟通有关;2)通过电子病历进行通信(无需事先同意或确认收到信息);3)将患者作为信息交换的中介;4)无视其他专业人员的指示而未与其沟通;5)向患者表达不同的标准,将治疗决策的责任委托给患者;6)假定抗精神病药物监测是由其他专业人员进行的;7)阻碍沟通的等级制度;8)经验丰富的医疗顾问。这些话题涉及固有的医疗保健系统问题,主要是缺乏可用时间和同事之间的沟通作为一项无偿任务。结论:卫生保健系统造成的沟通障碍可能导致误解,从而导致不理想的健康结果。共享这些信息可以指导组织制定战略,以改善医院环境中的沟通和促进团队合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difficulties in monitoring cardiometabolic risk in the chronic use of atypical antipsychotics for non-traditional indications, in a specialty hospital in Argentina: a qualitative study.

Objective: To explore the barriers that hinder the proper monitoring of adverse effects in patients prescribed antipsychotics in a medical specialty hospital in Argentina.

Method: A qualitative interpretive study of narrative design with ten semi-structured individual interviews with doctors from various specialties, conducted in outpatient clinics between May and November 2022, with an ad hoc guide based on a bibliography.

Results: Barriers in interpersonal relationships emerged, highlighting the insufficient duration and infrequent consultations, communication problems between professionals and between professionals and their patients, and difficulties in teamwork. The obstacles were related to 1) limited direct communication; 2) communication via electronic medical records (without prior agreement or confirmation of receipt of messages); 3) use of patients as intermediaries for message exchange; 4) disregarding another professional's indications without communicating with them; 5) expressing differing criteria to the patient, delegating responsibility for treatment decisions to the patient; 6) assuming that antipsychotic monitoring is carried out by another professional; 7) hierarchies that hinder communication, and 8) experienced medical referents. These topics relate to inherent healthcare system issues, mainly the lack of available time and communication between colleagues as an unpaid task.

Conclusions: Communication barriers imposed by the healthcare system can result in misunderstandings that lead to suboptimal health outcomes. Sharing this information could guide organizations in developing strategies to improve communication and facilitate teamwork in hospital settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信