2019冠状病毒病通知住院环境中医疗系统应急准备的优先事项:美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告

Lynn M Baniak, Jill Guttormson, Deena K Costa, M Melanie Lyons, Jakob I McSparron, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Daniel Brodie, Meghan Lane-Fall, Fang Han, Thomas Penzel, Jennifer B Seaman, Jonna L Morris
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病通知住院环境中医疗系统应急准备的优先事项:美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告","authors":"Lynn M Baniak, Jill Guttormson, Deena K Costa, M Melanie Lyons, Jakob I McSparron, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Daniel Brodie, Meghan Lane-Fall, Fang Han, Thomas Penzel, Jennifer B Seaman, Jonna L Morris","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-221ST","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This workshop identified a set of core system-level care delivery priorities that emerged during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic to assist global healthcare systems to respond to future similar emergencies using an informed and systematic approach. Led by a working group (<i>n</i> = 14) of nurses and physicians with diverse clinical and administrative backgrounds, we conducted a literature review of staffing, supplies, and systems in hospital inpatient settings to inform potential candidate priorities of COVID-19 care delivery challenges. We then used a modified Delphi consensus approach to elicit expert opinion from clinicians, healthcare and public health administrators, and health services researchers. Three rounds of online surveys were completed. To retain survey items, we <i>a priori</i> determined a threshold of 75% or greater endorsement for items rated \"highly important to essential.\" A total of 47 international experts responded. Forty of 71 care delivery priorities were retained. These 40 priorities comprised 25 systems (8 related to infrastructure [e.g., systemic enhanced support from federal resources during a pandemic]; 8 to care delivery [e.g., policies in place and operational for rationing of care]; and 9 to training, infection control, and communication [e.g., training for healthcare workers on protocols and/or processes for rapid testing]), 11 related to supplies (e.g., safe handling of biomedical waste), and 4 related to staffing (e.g., programs and/or systems to support staff retention). By organizing these priorities on the basis of implementation complexity and applying relevant frameworks, the project offers strategies to inform investment and guide global healthcare systems in pandemic preparedness planning for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":"22 6","pages":"809-819"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priorities for Healthcare Systems Emergency Preparedness in Inpatient Settings Informed by COVID-19: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn M Baniak, Jill Guttormson, Deena K Costa, M Melanie Lyons, Jakob I McSparron, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Daniel Brodie, Meghan Lane-Fall, Fang Han, Thomas Penzel, Jennifer B Seaman, Jonna L Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-221ST\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This workshop identified a set of core system-level care delivery priorities that emerged during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic to assist global healthcare systems to respond to future similar emergencies using an informed and systematic approach. Led by a working group (<i>n</i> = 14) of nurses and physicians with diverse clinical and administrative backgrounds, we conducted a literature review of staffing, supplies, and systems in hospital inpatient settings to inform potential candidate priorities of COVID-19 care delivery challenges. We then used a modified Delphi consensus approach to elicit expert opinion from clinicians, healthcare and public health administrators, and health services researchers. Three rounds of online surveys were completed. To retain survey items, we <i>a priori</i> determined a threshold of 75% or greater endorsement for items rated \\\"highly important to essential.\\\" A total of 47 international experts responded. Forty of 71 care delivery priorities were retained. These 40 priorities comprised 25 systems (8 related to infrastructure [e.g., systemic enhanced support from federal resources during a pandemic]; 8 to care delivery [e.g., policies in place and operational for rationing of care]; and 9 to training, infection control, and communication [e.g., training for healthcare workers on protocols and/or processes for rapid testing]), 11 related to supplies (e.g., safe handling of biomedical waste), and 4 related to staffing (e.g., programs and/or systems to support staff retention). By organizing these priorities on the basis of implementation complexity and applying relevant frameworks, the project offers strategies to inform investment and guide global healthcare systems in pandemic preparedness planning for the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"809-819\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-221ST\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-221ST","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本次研讨会确定了冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间出现的一套核心系统级医疗服务优先事项,以协助全球卫生保健系统使用知情和系统的方法应对未来类似的紧急情况。在一个由具有不同临床和行政背景的护士和医生组成的工作组(n = 14)的领导下,我们对医院住院环境中的人员配置、供应和系统进行了文献综述,以告知COVID-19医疗服务挑战的潜在候选优先事项。然后,我们使用改进的德尔菲共识方法来征求临床医生、卫生保健和公共卫生管理人员以及卫生服务研究人员的专家意见。完成了三轮在线调查。为了保留调查项目,我们先验地确定了75%或更高的门槛,以支持评级为“高度重要到必要”的项目。共有47位国际专家作出了回应。71项保健服务优先事项中有40项得到保留。这40个优先事项包括25个系统(8个与基础设施有关[例如,大流行期间联邦资源的系统性加强支持];8 .提供护理服务[例如,制定和实施配给护理的政策];9个与培训、感染控制和沟通有关[例如,对卫生保健工作者进行快速检测方案和/或流程的培训]),11个与供应有关(例如,生物医学废物的安全处理),4个与人员配备有关(例如,支持员工保留的规划和/或系统)。通过根据实施的复杂性组织这些优先事项,并应用相关框架,该项目提供战略,为投资提供信息,并指导全球卫生保健系统制定未来的大流行防范规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Priorities for Healthcare Systems Emergency Preparedness in Inpatient Settings Informed by COVID-19: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

This workshop identified a set of core system-level care delivery priorities that emerged during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic to assist global healthcare systems to respond to future similar emergencies using an informed and systematic approach. Led by a working group (n = 14) of nurses and physicians with diverse clinical and administrative backgrounds, we conducted a literature review of staffing, supplies, and systems in hospital inpatient settings to inform potential candidate priorities of COVID-19 care delivery challenges. We then used a modified Delphi consensus approach to elicit expert opinion from clinicians, healthcare and public health administrators, and health services researchers. Three rounds of online surveys were completed. To retain survey items, we a priori determined a threshold of 75% or greater endorsement for items rated "highly important to essential." A total of 47 international experts responded. Forty of 71 care delivery priorities were retained. These 40 priorities comprised 25 systems (8 related to infrastructure [e.g., systemic enhanced support from federal resources during a pandemic]; 8 to care delivery [e.g., policies in place and operational for rationing of care]; and 9 to training, infection control, and communication [e.g., training for healthcare workers on protocols and/or processes for rapid testing]), 11 related to supplies (e.g., safe handling of biomedical waste), and 4 related to staffing (e.g., programs and/or systems to support staff retention). By organizing these priorities on the basis of implementation complexity and applying relevant frameworks, the project offers strategies to inform investment and guide global healthcare systems in pandemic preparedness planning for the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信