通过病例对照比较确定疫情风险因素。

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Nina H Fefferman, Michael J Blum, Lydia Bourouiba, Nathaniel L Gibson, Qiang He, Debra L Miller, Monica Papeș, Dana K Pasquale, Connor Verheyen, Sadie J Ryan
{"title":"通过病例对照比较确定疫情风险因素。","authors":"Nina H Fefferman, Michael J Blum, Lydia Bourouiba, Nathaniel L Gibson, Qiang He, Debra L Miller, Monica Papeș, Dana K Pasquale, Connor Verheyen, Sadie J Ryan","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-00916-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outbreaks are typically investigated using approaches that aim to identify place- and context-dependent causative factors. As the focus is on understanding the basis of a specific outbreak, the resulting narratives are rarely suitable for forecasting risk or developing generalizable predictive and preventative measures. This Perspective article proposes applying a case-control framework as an outbreak epidemiological study design to promote evidence-based decision-making for prevention and response to outbreaks. The approach involves identifying counterfactuals, with case-control comparisons drawn to test hypotheses about conditions that manifest outbreaks. First, a framework is described for iterative multidisciplinary interrogation to elucidate and identify minimally sufficient sets of factors that lead to disease outbreaks. Next, example case-control comparison frameworks are discussed, centered on pathogen(s), influential contributor(s), or landscape(s), illustrated with examples focused on pathogen transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"210"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying outbreak risk factors through case-controls comparisons.\",\"authors\":\"Nina H Fefferman, Michael J Blum, Lydia Bourouiba, Nathaniel L Gibson, Qiang He, Debra L Miller, Monica Papeș, Dana K Pasquale, Connor Verheyen, Sadie J Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-025-00916-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Outbreaks are typically investigated using approaches that aim to identify place- and context-dependent causative factors. As the focus is on understanding the basis of a specific outbreak, the resulting narratives are rarely suitable for forecasting risk or developing generalizable predictive and preventative measures. This Perspective article proposes applying a case-control framework as an outbreak epidemiological study design to promote evidence-based decision-making for prevention and response to outbreaks. The approach involves identifying counterfactuals, with case-control comparisons drawn to test hypotheses about conditions that manifest outbreaks. First, a framework is described for iterative multidisciplinary interrogation to elucidate and identify minimally sufficient sets of factors that lead to disease outbreaks. Next, example case-control comparison frameworks are discussed, centered on pathogen(s), influential contributor(s), or landscape(s), illustrated with examples focused on pathogen transmission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125396/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00916-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00916-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫情调查通常采用旨在确定地点和环境相关致病因素的方法。由于重点是了解特定疫情的基础,因此得出的叙述很少适用于预测风险或制定可推广的预测和预防措施。这篇Perspective文章建议应用病例控制框架作为疫情流行病学研究设计,以促进基于证据的决策,以预防和应对疫情。该方法涉及识别反事实,并通过病例对照比较来检验有关明显暴发条件的假设。首先,描述了一个框架,用于反复的多学科询问,以阐明和确定导致疾病爆发的最低限度的因素集。接下来,讨论了以病原体、有影响的贡献者或景观为中心的病例-对照比较框架,并以病原体传播为重点的例子进行了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying outbreak risk factors through case-controls comparisons.

Outbreaks are typically investigated using approaches that aim to identify place- and context-dependent causative factors. As the focus is on understanding the basis of a specific outbreak, the resulting narratives are rarely suitable for forecasting risk or developing generalizable predictive and preventative measures. This Perspective article proposes applying a case-control framework as an outbreak epidemiological study design to promote evidence-based decision-making for prevention and response to outbreaks. The approach involves identifying counterfactuals, with case-control comparisons drawn to test hypotheses about conditions that manifest outbreaks. First, a framework is described for iterative multidisciplinary interrogation to elucidate and identify minimally sufficient sets of factors that lead to disease outbreaks. Next, example case-control comparison frameworks are discussed, centered on pathogen(s), influential contributor(s), or landscape(s), illustrated with examples focused on pathogen transmission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信