Henry R. Kranzler, Zeal Jinwala, Christal N. Davis, Heng Xu, Joanna M. Biernacka, Hang Zhou, Rachel L. Kember, Joel Gelernter, Richard Feinn
{"title":"托吡酯安慰剂对照试验中酒精相关性状的多基因风险对治疗结果的调节作用","authors":"Henry R. Kranzler, Zeal Jinwala, Christal N. Davis, Heng Xu, Joanna M. Biernacka, Hang Zhou, Rachel L. Kember, Joel Gelernter, Richard Feinn","doi":"10.1111/acer.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), topiramate significantly reduced heavy drinking days (HDDs), and alcohol-related problems. In a secondary analysis of those findings, we examined four broad measures of genetic risk—polygenic scores (PGS)—of problematic alcohol use (PAU), drinks per week (DPW), and time to relapse to any drinking (TR) and heavy drinking (THR) as moderators of topiramate's effect on HDDs and alcohol-related problems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from 285 individuals with AUD (65.6% male) of European-like ancestry, who were treated with either topiramate (49.1%) or placebo (50.9%). All patients underwent genome-wide array genotyping, and PGS were calculated using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of PAU, DPW, and TR and THR (two time-to-event outcomes among patients treated in AUD pharmacotherapy trials). We hypothesized an interaction effect in which greater genetic risk—particularly for PAU—would be associated with a greater therapeutic response to topiramate than placebo.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>As shown previously, topiramate significantly reduced both HDDs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Short Index of Problems (SIP) scores (<i>b</i> = −3.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001) more than placebo. There were nonsignificant associations of higher PGS with more HDDs (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98–1.41, <i>p</i> = 0.091) and a greater reduction in HDDs in the topiramate group (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62–1.03, <i>p</i> = 0.089). There were also significant interaction effects with treatment on SIP score by PGS for PAU (<i>b</i> = −1.64, SE = 0.78, <i>p</i> = 0.033), TR (<i>b</i> = −2.16, SE = 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and TRH (<i>b</i> = −2.17, SE = 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings provide proof of principle for the use of alcohol-related PGS as moderators of the effects of topiramate for treating AUD. Larger RCTs of topiramate are needed to provide adequate statistical power to validate this pharmacogenetic approach to precision AUD treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 6","pages":"1297-1305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderation of treatment outcomes by polygenic risk for alcohol-related traits in placebo-controlled trials of topiramate\",\"authors\":\"Henry R. Kranzler, Zeal Jinwala, Christal N. Davis, Heng Xu, Joanna M. Biernacka, Hang Zhou, Rachel L. Kember, Joel Gelernter, Richard Feinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acer.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), topiramate significantly reduced heavy drinking days (HDDs), and alcohol-related problems. In a secondary analysis of those findings, we examined four broad measures of genetic risk—polygenic scores (PGS)—of problematic alcohol use (PAU), drinks per week (DPW), and time to relapse to any drinking (TR) and heavy drinking (THR) as moderators of topiramate's effect on HDDs and alcohol-related problems.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed data from 285 individuals with AUD (65.6% male) of European-like ancestry, who were treated with either topiramate (49.1%) or placebo (50.9%). All patients underwent genome-wide array genotyping, and PGS were calculated using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of PAU, DPW, and TR and THR (two time-to-event outcomes among patients treated in AUD pharmacotherapy trials). We hypothesized an interaction effect in which greater genetic risk—particularly for PAU—would be associated with a greater therapeutic response to topiramate than placebo.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>As shown previously, topiramate significantly reduced both HDDs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Short Index of Problems (SIP) scores (<i>b</i> = −3.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001) more than placebo. There were nonsignificant associations of higher PGS with more HDDs (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98–1.41, <i>p</i> = 0.091) and a greater reduction in HDDs in the topiramate group (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62–1.03, <i>p</i> = 0.089). There were also significant interaction effects with treatment on SIP score by PGS for PAU (<i>b</i> = −1.64, SE = 0.78, <i>p</i> = 0.033), TR (<i>b</i> = −2.16, SE = 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and TRH (<i>b</i> = −2.17, SE = 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings provide proof of principle for the use of alcohol-related PGS as moderators of the effects of topiramate for treating AUD. Larger RCTs of topiramate are needed to provide adequate statistical power to validate this pharmacogenetic approach to precision AUD treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\"49 6\",\"pages\":\"1297-1305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70052\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Moderation of treatment outcomes by polygenic risk for alcohol-related traits in placebo-controlled trials of topiramate
Background
In two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), topiramate significantly reduced heavy drinking days (HDDs), and alcohol-related problems. In a secondary analysis of those findings, we examined four broad measures of genetic risk—polygenic scores (PGS)—of problematic alcohol use (PAU), drinks per week (DPW), and time to relapse to any drinking (TR) and heavy drinking (THR) as moderators of topiramate's effect on HDDs and alcohol-related problems.
Methods
We analyzed data from 285 individuals with AUD (65.6% male) of European-like ancestry, who were treated with either topiramate (49.1%) or placebo (50.9%). All patients underwent genome-wide array genotyping, and PGS were calculated using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of PAU, DPW, and TR and THR (two time-to-event outcomes among patients treated in AUD pharmacotherapy trials). We hypothesized an interaction effect in which greater genetic risk—particularly for PAU—would be associated with a greater therapeutic response to topiramate than placebo.
Results
As shown previously, topiramate significantly reduced both HDDs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, p < 0.001) and Short Index of Problems (SIP) scores (b = −3.04, p < 0.001) more than placebo. There were nonsignificant associations of higher PGS with more HDDs (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98–1.41, p = 0.091) and a greater reduction in HDDs in the topiramate group (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62–1.03, p = 0.089). There were also significant interaction effects with treatment on SIP score by PGS for PAU (b = −1.64, SE = 0.78, p = 0.033), TR (b = −2.16, SE = 0.72, p = 0.003), and TRH (b = −2.17, SE = 0.72, p = 0.003).
Conclusions
These findings provide proof of principle for the use of alcohol-related PGS as moderators of the effects of topiramate for treating AUD. Larger RCTs of topiramate are needed to provide adequate statistical power to validate this pharmacogenetic approach to precision AUD treatment.