贡献和遗产:对新西兰老年人为研究目的分享其例行收集的健康数据的态度进行定性研究。

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Engelina Groenewald, Jasmine Appleton, Brendan Hallam, Cristian Gonzalez-Prieto, Susan Yates, Daniel Wilson, Gillian Dobbie, Rosie Dobson, Sarah Cullum
{"title":"贡献和遗产:对新西兰老年人为研究目的分享其例行收集的健康数据的态度进行定性研究。","authors":"Engelina Groenewald, Jasmine Appleton, Brendan Hallam, Cristian Gonzalez-Prieto, Susan Yates, Daniel Wilson, Gillian Dobbie, Rosie Dobson, Sarah Cullum","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01212-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults, especially those with dementia, are often excluded from health research due to physical and medical comorbidities, and the assumption that those with cognitive impairment won't be able to consent. Using routinely collected data for research purposes is a way to include older people in research, and therefore the benefits of research. However, very little research has been done to examine the attitudes of older people towards sharing their routinely collected health data for research purposes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with older health service users in the Counties Manukau health district of Auckland, New Zealand. The interviews explored participants' views around the use of de-identified health data for health service improvement and health services research. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes identified were: 1) Benefits: participants believed that there were benefits to sharing their health data such as helping others, improving health services, advancing scientific knowledge, and giving back to the health system; sharing health data was also seen as a reflection of good character, and people felt that their pre-existing views about whether they wished to share health data should be respected even if they were no longer able to consent. 2) Concerns: participants had concerns about sharing data with private companies, the use of inaccurate data, and the potential personal and societal consequences of sharing health data. 3) Expectations: participants encouraged collaboration between institutions in New Zealand, but expected data privacy to be maintained, processes to be transparent and cultural values around data to be respected; there was an expectation those sharing health data (patients or institutions) should benefit from any private sector gains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older people in our study were supportive of sharing their deidentified health data for research purposes provided that the research would benefit others, now and in the future. This provides more confidence in the use routinely collected health data of older people for research, provided that researchers handle data in a respectful way and use it to benefit communities while avoiding potential harms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribution and legacy: a qualitative study of older people's attitudes about sharing their routinely collected health data for research purposes in New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Engelina Groenewald, Jasmine Appleton, Brendan Hallam, Cristian Gonzalez-Prieto, Susan Yates, Daniel Wilson, Gillian Dobbie, Rosie Dobson, Sarah Cullum\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-025-01212-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults, especially those with dementia, are often excluded from health research due to physical and medical comorbidities, and the assumption that those with cognitive impairment won't be able to consent. Using routinely collected data for research purposes is a way to include older people in research, and therefore the benefits of research. However, very little research has been done to examine the attitudes of older people towards sharing their routinely collected health data for research purposes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with older health service users in the Counties Manukau health district of Auckland, New Zealand. The interviews explored participants' views around the use of de-identified health data for health service improvement and health services research. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes identified were: 1) Benefits: participants believed that there were benefits to sharing their health data such as helping others, improving health services, advancing scientific knowledge, and giving back to the health system; sharing health data was also seen as a reflection of good character, and people felt that their pre-existing views about whether they wished to share health data should be respected even if they were no longer able to consent. 2) Concerns: participants had concerns about sharing data with private companies, the use of inaccurate data, and the potential personal and societal consequences of sharing health data. 3) Expectations: participants encouraged collaboration between institutions in New Zealand, but expected data privacy to be maintained, processes to be transparent and cultural values around data to be respected; there was an expectation those sharing health data (patients or institutions) should benefit from any private sector gains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older people in our study were supportive of sharing their deidentified health data for research purposes provided that the research would benefit others, now and in the future. This provides more confidence in the use routinely collected health data of older people for research, provided that researchers handle data in a respectful way and use it to benefit communities while avoiding potential harms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01212-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01212-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人,特别是那些患有痴呆症的老年人,经常被排除在健康研究之外,因为他们有身体和医学上的合并症,并且假设那些有认知障碍的人不会同意。将常规收集的数据用于研究目的是将老年人纳入研究的一种方式,因此研究的好处。然而,很少有研究调查老年人对为研究目的分享他们例行收集的健康数据的态度。方法:对新西兰奥克兰市Manukau卫生区的老年卫生服务使用者进行了28次半结构化访谈。这些访谈探讨了与会者对利用去识别化的健康数据改善保健服务和开展保健服务研究的看法。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。结果:确定的主题是:1)利益:参与者认为分享他们的健康数据有好处,如帮助他人,改善卫生服务,推进科学知识,回馈卫生系统;共享健康数据也被视为一种良好品格的体现,人们认为,即使他们不再能够同意,也应尊重他们先前关于是否希望共享健康数据的观点。2)关切:与会者对与私营公司共享数据、使用不准确数据以及共享健康数据的潜在个人和社会后果表示关切。3)期望:参与者鼓励新西兰各机构之间的合作,但希望保持数据隐私,流程透明,尊重数据的文化价值观;人们期望那些共享卫生数据的人(病人或机构)应该从私营部门的任何收益中受益。结论:在我们的研究中,老年人支持为研究目的分享他们的未确定的健康数据,只要这项研究现在和将来对他人有益。这为使用常规收集的老年人健康数据进行研究提供了更大的信心,前提是研究人员以尊重的方式处理数据,并在避免潜在危害的同时利用这些数据造福社区。试验注册:NA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contribution and legacy: a qualitative study of older people's attitudes about sharing their routinely collected health data for research purposes in New Zealand.

Background: Older adults, especially those with dementia, are often excluded from health research due to physical and medical comorbidities, and the assumption that those with cognitive impairment won't be able to consent. Using routinely collected data for research purposes is a way to include older people in research, and therefore the benefits of research. However, very little research has been done to examine the attitudes of older people towards sharing their routinely collected health data for research purposes.

Method: Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with older health service users in the Counties Manukau health district of Auckland, New Zealand. The interviews explored participants' views around the use of de-identified health data for health service improvement and health services research. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Themes identified were: 1) Benefits: participants believed that there were benefits to sharing their health data such as helping others, improving health services, advancing scientific knowledge, and giving back to the health system; sharing health data was also seen as a reflection of good character, and people felt that their pre-existing views about whether they wished to share health data should be respected even if they were no longer able to consent. 2) Concerns: participants had concerns about sharing data with private companies, the use of inaccurate data, and the potential personal and societal consequences of sharing health data. 3) Expectations: participants encouraged collaboration between institutions in New Zealand, but expected data privacy to be maintained, processes to be transparent and cultural values around data to be respected; there was an expectation those sharing health data (patients or institutions) should benefit from any private sector gains.

Conclusion: Older people in our study were supportive of sharing their deidentified health data for research purposes provided that the research would benefit others, now and in the future. This provides more confidence in the use routinely collected health data of older people for research, provided that researchers handle data in a respectful way and use it to benefit communities while avoiding potential harms.

Trial registration: NA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信