看到光环:恐惧景观的空间和消费者资源约束。

IF 2.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1086/735688
Theresa W Ong, Lisa C McManus, Vítor V Vasconcelos, Luojun Yang, Chenyang Su
{"title":"看到光环:恐惧景观的空间和消费者资源约束。","authors":"Theresa W Ong, Lisa C McManus, Vítor V Vasconcelos, Luojun Yang, Chenyang Su","doi":"10.1086/735688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractVegetation-free space, or \"halos,\" surrounding habitat patches are visually striking spatial phenomena observed in various ecosystems. These halos are linked to the landscape of fear hypothesis, where risk-averse herbivores concentrate grazing near safe shelters within their habitat. We develop theory demonstrating how habitat distribution shapes trophic interactions, leading to alternative stable states in spatial patterns. Using coral reefs as a model system, we investigate the relationship between halo patterns and predator populations. Specifically, we address the inconsistency between theoretical predictions and empirical observations, where halos are absent in some protected reefs and their sizes are uncorrelated with predator abundance. Our findings reveal that long-term coral distribution patterns influence trophic interactions, supporting the landscape of fear hypothesis. When coral patches are dispersed, herbivore shelter from predators is more evenly distributed across the seascape, facilitating overgrazing and halo oscillation. When coral patches are clustered, limited shelter stabilizes halos, but reduced herbivore limitation can also drive critical transitions to cycles with low vegetation that are difficult to reverse. Discordance between theory and observations may therefore arise from differences in underlying spatial shelter distribution, with broad implications for how landscapes of fear emerge from patchy ecosystems to signal resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 6","pages":"590-603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeing Halos: Spatial and Consumer-Resource Constraints to Landscapes of Fear.\",\"authors\":\"Theresa W Ong, Lisa C McManus, Vítor V Vasconcelos, Luojun Yang, Chenyang Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/735688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractVegetation-free space, or \\\"halos,\\\" surrounding habitat patches are visually striking spatial phenomena observed in various ecosystems. These halos are linked to the landscape of fear hypothesis, where risk-averse herbivores concentrate grazing near safe shelters within their habitat. We develop theory demonstrating how habitat distribution shapes trophic interactions, leading to alternative stable states in spatial patterns. Using coral reefs as a model system, we investigate the relationship between halo patterns and predator populations. Specifically, we address the inconsistency between theoretical predictions and empirical observations, where halos are absent in some protected reefs and their sizes are uncorrelated with predator abundance. Our findings reveal that long-term coral distribution patterns influence trophic interactions, supporting the landscape of fear hypothesis. When coral patches are dispersed, herbivore shelter from predators is more evenly distributed across the seascape, facilitating overgrazing and halo oscillation. When coral patches are clustered, limited shelter stabilizes halos, but reduced herbivore limitation can also drive critical transitions to cycles with low vegetation that are difficult to reverse. Discordance between theory and observations may therefore arise from differences in underlying spatial shelter distribution, with broad implications for how landscapes of fear emerge from patchy ecosystems to signal resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"205 6\",\"pages\":\"590-603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/735688\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/735688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要生境斑块周围的无植被空间或“光晕”是在各种生态系统中观察到的视觉上引人注目的空间现象。这些光环与恐惧景观假说有关,即厌恶风险的食草动物集中在栖息地内的安全避难所附近放牧。我们发展了理论,证明栖息地分布如何塑造营养相互作用,导致空间格局的稳定状态。利用珊瑚礁作为模型系统,我们研究了光环模式与捕食者种群之间的关系。具体来说,我们解决了理论预测和经验观察之间的不一致,在一些受保护的珊瑚礁中没有光晕,它们的大小与捕食者的丰度无关。我们的研究结果表明,长期珊瑚分布模式影响营养相互作用,支持恐惧景观假说。当珊瑚斑块分散时,食草动物躲避捕食者的庇护所更均匀地分布在整个海景上,促进了过度放牧和晕振荡。当珊瑚斑块聚集时,有限的庇护所稳定了光晕,但食草动物限制的减少也会推动向低植被循环的关键转变,这很难逆转。因此,理论和观察之间的不一致可能源于潜在空间庇护所分布的差异,这对如何从斑块生态系统中出现恐惧景观以显示复原力具有广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seeing Halos: Spatial and Consumer-Resource Constraints to Landscapes of Fear.

AbstractVegetation-free space, or "halos," surrounding habitat patches are visually striking spatial phenomena observed in various ecosystems. These halos are linked to the landscape of fear hypothesis, where risk-averse herbivores concentrate grazing near safe shelters within their habitat. We develop theory demonstrating how habitat distribution shapes trophic interactions, leading to alternative stable states in spatial patterns. Using coral reefs as a model system, we investigate the relationship between halo patterns and predator populations. Specifically, we address the inconsistency between theoretical predictions and empirical observations, where halos are absent in some protected reefs and their sizes are uncorrelated with predator abundance. Our findings reveal that long-term coral distribution patterns influence trophic interactions, supporting the landscape of fear hypothesis. When coral patches are dispersed, herbivore shelter from predators is more evenly distributed across the seascape, facilitating overgrazing and halo oscillation. When coral patches are clustered, limited shelter stabilizes halos, but reduced herbivore limitation can also drive critical transitions to cycles with low vegetation that are difficult to reverse. Discordance between theory and observations may therefore arise from differences in underlying spatial shelter distribution, with broad implications for how landscapes of fear emerge from patchy ecosystems to signal resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信