{"title":"超越尺寸二态:伦施规则的过去、现在和未来。","authors":"Ken S Toyama","doi":"10.1086/735583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractA pattern of allometry in which the degree of male-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with species body size is known as \"Rensch's rule.\" Over the past decades, a growing amount of Rensch's rule studies has advanced our understanding of SSD, our knowledge of its prevalence in nature, and our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying its evolution. However, Bernhard Rensch, when describing the pattern for the first time, considered the allometry of SSD only as a special case of a more general pattern in which dimorphism in any relative sexual difference increased with body size. In this perspective I revisit the history of Rensch's rule, starting with its popularization in recent decades, then diving into the original works by Rensch to rediscover his original observations, and finally discussing the implications of studying Rensch's pattern beyond its applications to SSD. The strong bias toward body size in the study of Rensch's rule has proven valuable regarding our understanding of the evolution of SSD. Using empirical examples, I propose, however, that expanding the study of the pattern to other traits might prove insightful for the general study of sexual dimorphism and phenotypic diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 6","pages":"548-558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Size Dimorphism: The Past, Present, and Future of Rensch's Rule.\",\"authors\":\"Ken S Toyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/735583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractA pattern of allometry in which the degree of male-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with species body size is known as \\\"Rensch's rule.\\\" Over the past decades, a growing amount of Rensch's rule studies has advanced our understanding of SSD, our knowledge of its prevalence in nature, and our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying its evolution. However, Bernhard Rensch, when describing the pattern for the first time, considered the allometry of SSD only as a special case of a more general pattern in which dimorphism in any relative sexual difference increased with body size. In this perspective I revisit the history of Rensch's rule, starting with its popularization in recent decades, then diving into the original works by Rensch to rediscover his original observations, and finally discussing the implications of studying Rensch's pattern beyond its applications to SSD. The strong bias toward body size in the study of Rensch's rule has proven valuable regarding our understanding of the evolution of SSD. Using empirical examples, I propose, however, that expanding the study of the pattern to other traits might prove insightful for the general study of sexual dimorphism and phenotypic diversity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"205 6\",\"pages\":\"548-558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/735583\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/735583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond Size Dimorphism: The Past, Present, and Future of Rensch's Rule.
AbstractA pattern of allometry in which the degree of male-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with species body size is known as "Rensch's rule." Over the past decades, a growing amount of Rensch's rule studies has advanced our understanding of SSD, our knowledge of its prevalence in nature, and our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying its evolution. However, Bernhard Rensch, when describing the pattern for the first time, considered the allometry of SSD only as a special case of a more general pattern in which dimorphism in any relative sexual difference increased with body size. In this perspective I revisit the history of Rensch's rule, starting with its popularization in recent decades, then diving into the original works by Rensch to rediscover his original observations, and finally discussing the implications of studying Rensch's pattern beyond its applications to SSD. The strong bias toward body size in the study of Rensch's rule has proven valuable regarding our understanding of the evolution of SSD. Using empirical examples, I propose, however, that expanding the study of the pattern to other traits might prove insightful for the general study of sexual dimorphism and phenotypic diversity.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.