超越尺寸二态:伦施规则的过去、现在和未来。

IF 2.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1086/735583
Ken S Toyama
{"title":"超越尺寸二态:伦施规则的过去、现在和未来。","authors":"Ken S Toyama","doi":"10.1086/735583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractA pattern of allometry in which the degree of male-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with species body size is known as \"Rensch's rule.\" Over the past decades, a growing amount of Rensch's rule studies has advanced our understanding of SSD, our knowledge of its prevalence in nature, and our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying its evolution. However, Bernhard Rensch, when describing the pattern for the first time, considered the allometry of SSD only as a special case of a more general pattern in which dimorphism in any relative sexual difference increased with body size. In this perspective I revisit the history of Rensch's rule, starting with its popularization in recent decades, then diving into the original works by Rensch to rediscover his original observations, and finally discussing the implications of studying Rensch's pattern beyond its applications to SSD. The strong bias toward body size in the study of Rensch's rule has proven valuable regarding our understanding of the evolution of SSD. Using empirical examples, I propose, however, that expanding the study of the pattern to other traits might prove insightful for the general study of sexual dimorphism and phenotypic diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 6","pages":"548-558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Size Dimorphism: The Past, Present, and Future of Rensch's Rule.\",\"authors\":\"Ken S Toyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/735583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractA pattern of allometry in which the degree of male-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with species body size is known as \\\"Rensch's rule.\\\" Over the past decades, a growing amount of Rensch's rule studies has advanced our understanding of SSD, our knowledge of its prevalence in nature, and our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying its evolution. However, Bernhard Rensch, when describing the pattern for the first time, considered the allometry of SSD only as a special case of a more general pattern in which dimorphism in any relative sexual difference increased with body size. In this perspective I revisit the history of Rensch's rule, starting with its popularization in recent decades, then diving into the original works by Rensch to rediscover his original observations, and finally discussing the implications of studying Rensch's pattern beyond its applications to SSD. The strong bias toward body size in the study of Rensch's rule has proven valuable regarding our understanding of the evolution of SSD. Using empirical examples, I propose, however, that expanding the study of the pattern to other traits might prove insightful for the general study of sexual dimorphism and phenotypic diversity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"205 6\",\"pages\":\"548-558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/735583\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/735583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雄性偏向性大小二态性(SSD)的程度随物种体型的增加而增加的异速生长模式被称为“Rensch规则”。在过去的几十年里,越来越多的Rensch规则研究提高了我们对SSD的理解,我们对其在自然界中普遍存在的认识,以及我们对其演变机制的理解。然而,Bernhard Rensch在首次描述这种模式时,认为SSD异速发育只是一种更普遍的模式的特殊情况,在这种模式中,任何相对性别差异的二态性都随着体型的增加而增加。在这个视角下,我重新审视了伦施法则的历史,从近几十年的普及开始,然后深入到伦施的原创作品中,重新发现他最初的观察,最后讨论了研究伦施模式在SSD应用之外的意义。在Rensch规则的研究中,对身体大小的强烈偏见已被证明对我们理解SSD的进化有价值。然而,通过使用经验例子,我建议将这种模式的研究扩展到其他特征,可能会对两性二态性和表型多样性的一般研究产生深刻的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Size Dimorphism: The Past, Present, and Future of Rensch's Rule.

AbstractA pattern of allometry in which the degree of male-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with species body size is known as "Rensch's rule." Over the past decades, a growing amount of Rensch's rule studies has advanced our understanding of SSD, our knowledge of its prevalence in nature, and our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying its evolution. However, Bernhard Rensch, when describing the pattern for the first time, considered the allometry of SSD only as a special case of a more general pattern in which dimorphism in any relative sexual difference increased with body size. In this perspective I revisit the history of Rensch's rule, starting with its popularization in recent decades, then diving into the original works by Rensch to rediscover his original observations, and finally discussing the implications of studying Rensch's pattern beyond its applications to SSD. The strong bias toward body size in the study of Rensch's rule has proven valuable regarding our understanding of the evolution of SSD. Using empirical examples, I propose, however, that expanding the study of the pattern to other traits might prove insightful for the general study of sexual dimorphism and phenotypic diversity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信