澳大利亚矫形术和假肢用户调查(OPUS)客户服务满意度(CSS)模块的规范人口数据:一项试点研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Emily Ridgewell, Anastasia Haloulos, Jessica Landers, Michael P Dillon
{"title":"澳大利亚矫形术和假肢用户调查(OPUS)客户服务满意度(CSS)模块的规范人口数据:一项试点研究。","authors":"Emily Ridgewell, Anastasia Haloulos, Jessica Landers, Michael P Dillon","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many funding and accreditation bodies require orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) services to measure consumer satisfaction. While the Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey Client Satisfaction with Services (OPUS-CSS) module is a valid and reliable instrument to measure consumer satisfaction with O&P services, there are no normative population data to facilitate benchmarking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe normative population data for the OPUS-CSS in Australia and identify demographic and service-related factors for the most and least satisfied quartiles.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were adult O&P consumers, or parents/guardians of pediatric O&P consumers. Consumers were convenience sampled from O&P services enrolled in the Australian Orthotic Prosthetic Association Consumer Experience Program. As part of the Consumer Experience Program, an electronic survey was administered when a new orthosis/prosthesis was provided. The survey included demographics, service-related factors, and the OPUS-CSS module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consumers (n = 180) were highly satisfied with the O&P service they received (OPUS-CSS median score 78.7, interquartile range 55.1-100); acknowledging the distribution of scores was positively skewed with a ceiling effect. The factors that varied most between the upper and lower quartiles included age, education, income, work status, number of comorbidities, identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, and speaking a language other than English at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, consumers were highly satisfied with the O&P services received. Given the ceiling effect, the OPUS-CSS may not adequately distinguish between consumers who were highly satisfied. These pilot data can help inform future research to identify the factors that most influence consumer satisfaction with O&P services.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative population data for the Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Services (CSS) module in Australia: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Ridgewell, Anastasia Haloulos, Jessica Landers, Michael P Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many funding and accreditation bodies require orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) services to measure consumer satisfaction. While the Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey Client Satisfaction with Services (OPUS-CSS) module is a valid and reliable instrument to measure consumer satisfaction with O&P services, there are no normative population data to facilitate benchmarking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe normative population data for the OPUS-CSS in Australia and identify demographic and service-related factors for the most and least satisfied quartiles.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were adult O&P consumers, or parents/guardians of pediatric O&P consumers. Consumers were convenience sampled from O&P services enrolled in the Australian Orthotic Prosthetic Association Consumer Experience Program. As part of the Consumer Experience Program, an electronic survey was administered when a new orthosis/prosthesis was provided. The survey included demographics, service-related factors, and the OPUS-CSS module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consumers (n = 180) were highly satisfied with the O&P service they received (OPUS-CSS median score 78.7, interquartile range 55.1-100); acknowledging the distribution of scores was positively skewed with a ceiling effect. The factors that varied most between the upper and lower quartiles included age, education, income, work status, number of comorbidities, identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, and speaking a language other than English at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, consumers were highly satisfied with the O&P services received. Given the ceiling effect, the OPUS-CSS may not adequately distinguish between consumers who were highly satisfied. These pilot data can help inform future research to identify the factors that most influence consumer satisfaction with O&P services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000456\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多资助和认证机构要求矫形和假肢(O&P)服务来衡量消费者满意度。虽然矫形术和假肢用户调查客户对服务的满意度(OPUS-CSS)模块是衡量消费者对O&P服务满意度的有效和可靠的工具,但没有规范的人口数据来促进基准。目标:描述澳大利亚OPUS-CSS的规范人口数据,并确定最满意和最不满意的四分位数的人口统计学和服务相关因素。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:参与者为成人O&P消费者,或儿童O&P消费者的父母/监护人。消费者是方便抽样从O&P服务登记在澳大利亚矫形假肢协会消费者体验计划。作为消费者体验计划的一部分,当提供新的矫形器/假体时,进行电子调查。调查内容包括人口统计、服务相关因素和OPUS-CSS模块。结果:180名消费者对所获得的O&P服务高度满意(OPUS-CSS评分中位数为78.7分,四分差为55.1-100分);承认分数的分布是正倾斜的,存在天花板效应。上下四分位数之间差异最大的因素包括年龄、教育程度、收入、工作状态、合并症数量、土著或托雷斯海峡岛民身份,以及在家使用英语以外的语言。结论:平均而言,消费者对所获得的O&P服务非常满意。考虑到天花板效应,OPUS-CSS可能无法充分区分高度满意的消费者。这些试点数据可以帮助为未来的研究提供信息,以确定最影响消费者对油气服务满意度的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normative population data for the Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Services (CSS) module in Australia: A pilot study.

Background: Many funding and accreditation bodies require orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) services to measure consumer satisfaction. While the Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey Client Satisfaction with Services (OPUS-CSS) module is a valid and reliable instrument to measure consumer satisfaction with O&P services, there are no normative population data to facilitate benchmarking.

Objectives: Describe normative population data for the OPUS-CSS in Australia and identify demographic and service-related factors for the most and least satisfied quartiles.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Participants were adult O&P consumers, or parents/guardians of pediatric O&P consumers. Consumers were convenience sampled from O&P services enrolled in the Australian Orthotic Prosthetic Association Consumer Experience Program. As part of the Consumer Experience Program, an electronic survey was administered when a new orthosis/prosthesis was provided. The survey included demographics, service-related factors, and the OPUS-CSS module.

Results: Consumers (n = 180) were highly satisfied with the O&P service they received (OPUS-CSS median score 78.7, interquartile range 55.1-100); acknowledging the distribution of scores was positively skewed with a ceiling effect. The factors that varied most between the upper and lower quartiles included age, education, income, work status, number of comorbidities, identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, and speaking a language other than English at home.

Conclusions: On average, consumers were highly satisfied with the O&P services received. Given the ceiling effect, the OPUS-CSS may not adequately distinguish between consumers who were highly satisfied. These pilot data can help inform future research to identify the factors that most influence consumer satisfaction with O&P services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信