鉴定精神分裂症患者潜在神经反馈反应的典型相关方法。

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
I-Wei Shu, Yayu Lin, Imani Beckett, Michael L Thomas, Steven D Edland, Eric L Granholm, Fiza Singh
{"title":"鉴定精神分裂症患者潜在神经反馈反应的典型相关方法。","authors":"I-Wei Shu, Yayu Lin, Imani Beckett, Michael L Thomas, Steven D Edland, Eric L Granholm, Fiza Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10484-025-09716-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with schizophrenia exhibit frontal gamma dysregulation, and associated impairments in cognitive function. To improve self regulation of frontal gamma activity, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to test a novel neurofeedback (NFB) protocol, which rewards active maintenance of current or higher levels of frontal gamma coherence (gcoh-NFB). We report here unique treatment responses among participants with high versus low baseline working memory (WM) function. At baseline, among All participants, greater gamma dysregulation (higher resting gcoh) positively correlated with greater WM impairment. Among Active participants, completing gcoh-NFB training lowered the elevated baseline gcoh in participants with lower baseline WM function, and, conversely, increased the relatively lower baseline gcoh in participants with higher baseline WM function. In contrast, completing placebo-NFB produced no gcoh changes, regardless of baseline WM function. Compared to Placebo participants, all Active participants exhibited improved WM with training. The differing gcoh responses to NFB among Active participants suggested multiple neurophysiologic and WM responses during treatment. We selected canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to further evaluate potential latent and divergent responses. CCA identified two statistically significant canonical components; the stronger component representing the expected positive interactions between training-related WM responses, and the weaker component representing diverging interactions between training-related NFB and WM responses. Coefficients for the stronger (but not the weaker) component efficiently separated participants into distinct clusters with high, versus low, baseline WM, suggesting this response as the primary driver of divergent yet equally therapeutic effects observed for patients with low or high baseline WM function.</p>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Canonical Correlation Approach Towards Identifying Latent Neurofeedback Responses in Patients with Schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"I-Wei Shu, Yayu Lin, Imani Beckett, Michael L Thomas, Steven D Edland, Eric L Granholm, Fiza Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10484-025-09716-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with schizophrenia exhibit frontal gamma dysregulation, and associated impairments in cognitive function. To improve self regulation of frontal gamma activity, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to test a novel neurofeedback (NFB) protocol, which rewards active maintenance of current or higher levels of frontal gamma coherence (gcoh-NFB). We report here unique treatment responses among participants with high versus low baseline working memory (WM) function. At baseline, among All participants, greater gamma dysregulation (higher resting gcoh) positively correlated with greater WM impairment. Among Active participants, completing gcoh-NFB training lowered the elevated baseline gcoh in participants with lower baseline WM function, and, conversely, increased the relatively lower baseline gcoh in participants with higher baseline WM function. In contrast, completing placebo-NFB produced no gcoh changes, regardless of baseline WM function. Compared to Placebo participants, all Active participants exhibited improved WM with training. The differing gcoh responses to NFB among Active participants suggested multiple neurophysiologic and WM responses during treatment. We selected canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to further evaluate potential latent and divergent responses. CCA identified two statistically significant canonical components; the stronger component representing the expected positive interactions between training-related WM responses, and the weaker component representing diverging interactions between training-related NFB and WM responses. Coefficients for the stronger (but not the weaker) component efficiently separated participants into distinct clusters with high, versus low, baseline WM, suggesting this response as the primary driver of divergent yet equally therapeutic effects observed for patients with low or high baseline WM function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09716-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09716-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神分裂症患者表现出额叶伽玛失调,并伴有认知功能损伤。为了改善额叶伽马活动的自我调节,我们设计了一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验,以测试一种新的神经反馈(NFB)方案,该方案奖励积极维持当前或更高水平的额叶伽马相干性(goh -NFB)。我们在这里报告了高基线工作记忆(WM)功能与低基线工作记忆(WM)功能的参与者之间独特的治疗反应。在基线,在所有参与者中,更大的伽马失调(更高的静息gcoh)与更大的WM损伤正相关。在积极参与者中,完成gcoh- nfb训练降低了基线WM功能较低的参与者升高的基线gcoh,相反,增加了基线WM功能较高的参与者相对较低的基线gcoh。相比之下,无论基线WM功能如何,完成安慰剂- nfb均未产生goh变化。与安慰剂参与者相比,所有积极参与者在训练后都表现出改善的WM。活跃参与者对NFB的不同gcoh反应表明在治疗期间存在多种神经生理和WM反应。我们选择典型相关分析(CCA)来进一步评估潜在的潜在反应和发散反应。CCA确定了两个统计上显著的规范成分;较强的成分代表训练相关WM反应之间预期的积极相互作用,较弱的成分代表训练相关NFB和WM反应之间的偏离相互作用。较强(但不是较弱)成分的系数有效地将参与者分为基线WM高与基线WM低的不同组,表明这种反应是基线WM低或高患者观察到的不同但相同的治疗效果的主要驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Canonical Correlation Approach Towards Identifying Latent Neurofeedback Responses in Patients with Schizophrenia.

Patients with schizophrenia exhibit frontal gamma dysregulation, and associated impairments in cognitive function. To improve self regulation of frontal gamma activity, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to test a novel neurofeedback (NFB) protocol, which rewards active maintenance of current or higher levels of frontal gamma coherence (gcoh-NFB). We report here unique treatment responses among participants with high versus low baseline working memory (WM) function. At baseline, among All participants, greater gamma dysregulation (higher resting gcoh) positively correlated with greater WM impairment. Among Active participants, completing gcoh-NFB training lowered the elevated baseline gcoh in participants with lower baseline WM function, and, conversely, increased the relatively lower baseline gcoh in participants with higher baseline WM function. In contrast, completing placebo-NFB produced no gcoh changes, regardless of baseline WM function. Compared to Placebo participants, all Active participants exhibited improved WM with training. The differing gcoh responses to NFB among Active participants suggested multiple neurophysiologic and WM responses during treatment. We selected canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to further evaluate potential latent and divergent responses. CCA identified two statistically significant canonical components; the stronger component representing the expected positive interactions between training-related WM responses, and the weaker component representing diverging interactions between training-related NFB and WM responses. Coefficients for the stronger (but not the weaker) component efficiently separated participants into distinct clusters with high, versus low, baseline WM, suggesting this response as the primary driver of divergent yet equally therapeutic effects observed for patients with low or high baseline WM function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信