I-Wei Shu, Yayu Lin, Imani Beckett, Michael L Thomas, Steven D Edland, Eric L Granholm, Fiza Singh
{"title":"鉴定精神分裂症患者潜在神经反馈反应的典型相关方法。","authors":"I-Wei Shu, Yayu Lin, Imani Beckett, Michael L Thomas, Steven D Edland, Eric L Granholm, Fiza Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10484-025-09716-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with schizophrenia exhibit frontal gamma dysregulation, and associated impairments in cognitive function. To improve self regulation of frontal gamma activity, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to test a novel neurofeedback (NFB) protocol, which rewards active maintenance of current or higher levels of frontal gamma coherence (gcoh-NFB). We report here unique treatment responses among participants with high versus low baseline working memory (WM) function. At baseline, among All participants, greater gamma dysregulation (higher resting gcoh) positively correlated with greater WM impairment. Among Active participants, completing gcoh-NFB training lowered the elevated baseline gcoh in participants with lower baseline WM function, and, conversely, increased the relatively lower baseline gcoh in participants with higher baseline WM function. In contrast, completing placebo-NFB produced no gcoh changes, regardless of baseline WM function. Compared to Placebo participants, all Active participants exhibited improved WM with training. The differing gcoh responses to NFB among Active participants suggested multiple neurophysiologic and WM responses during treatment. We selected canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to further evaluate potential latent and divergent responses. CCA identified two statistically significant canonical components; the stronger component representing the expected positive interactions between training-related WM responses, and the weaker component representing diverging interactions between training-related NFB and WM responses. Coefficients for the stronger (but not the weaker) component efficiently separated participants into distinct clusters with high, versus low, baseline WM, suggesting this response as the primary driver of divergent yet equally therapeutic effects observed for patients with low or high baseline WM function.</p>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Canonical Correlation Approach Towards Identifying Latent Neurofeedback Responses in Patients with Schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"I-Wei Shu, Yayu Lin, Imani Beckett, Michael L Thomas, Steven D Edland, Eric L Granholm, Fiza Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10484-025-09716-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with schizophrenia exhibit frontal gamma dysregulation, and associated impairments in cognitive function. To improve self regulation of frontal gamma activity, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to test a novel neurofeedback (NFB) protocol, which rewards active maintenance of current or higher levels of frontal gamma coherence (gcoh-NFB). We report here unique treatment responses among participants with high versus low baseline working memory (WM) function. At baseline, among All participants, greater gamma dysregulation (higher resting gcoh) positively correlated with greater WM impairment. Among Active participants, completing gcoh-NFB training lowered the elevated baseline gcoh in participants with lower baseline WM function, and, conversely, increased the relatively lower baseline gcoh in participants with higher baseline WM function. In contrast, completing placebo-NFB produced no gcoh changes, regardless of baseline WM function. Compared to Placebo participants, all Active participants exhibited improved WM with training. The differing gcoh responses to NFB among Active participants suggested multiple neurophysiologic and WM responses during treatment. We selected canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to further evaluate potential latent and divergent responses. CCA identified two statistically significant canonical components; the stronger component representing the expected positive interactions between training-related WM responses, and the weaker component representing diverging interactions between training-related NFB and WM responses. Coefficients for the stronger (but not the weaker) component efficiently separated participants into distinct clusters with high, versus low, baseline WM, suggesting this response as the primary driver of divergent yet equally therapeutic effects observed for patients with low or high baseline WM function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09716-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09716-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Canonical Correlation Approach Towards Identifying Latent Neurofeedback Responses in Patients with Schizophrenia.
Patients with schizophrenia exhibit frontal gamma dysregulation, and associated impairments in cognitive function. To improve self regulation of frontal gamma activity, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to test a novel neurofeedback (NFB) protocol, which rewards active maintenance of current or higher levels of frontal gamma coherence (gcoh-NFB). We report here unique treatment responses among participants with high versus low baseline working memory (WM) function. At baseline, among All participants, greater gamma dysregulation (higher resting gcoh) positively correlated with greater WM impairment. Among Active participants, completing gcoh-NFB training lowered the elevated baseline gcoh in participants with lower baseline WM function, and, conversely, increased the relatively lower baseline gcoh in participants with higher baseline WM function. In contrast, completing placebo-NFB produced no gcoh changes, regardless of baseline WM function. Compared to Placebo participants, all Active participants exhibited improved WM with training. The differing gcoh responses to NFB among Active participants suggested multiple neurophysiologic and WM responses during treatment. We selected canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to further evaluate potential latent and divergent responses. CCA identified two statistically significant canonical components; the stronger component representing the expected positive interactions between training-related WM responses, and the weaker component representing diverging interactions between training-related NFB and WM responses. Coefficients for the stronger (but not the weaker) component efficiently separated participants into distinct clusters with high, versus low, baseline WM, suggesting this response as the primary driver of divergent yet equally therapeutic effects observed for patients with low or high baseline WM function.
期刊介绍:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.