芬兰MD安德森吞咽困难量表(MDADI)在头颈癌患者中的有效性

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Pihla Ranta, Ilpo Kinnunen, Heikki Irjala
{"title":"芬兰MD安德森吞咽困难量表(MDADI)在头颈癌患者中的有效性","authors":"Pihla Ranta, Ilpo Kinnunen, Heikki Irjala","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-03616-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire into Finnish and validate it in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). A total of 94 participants were included: 64 dysphagic HNC patients and 30 non-dysphagic age- and gender-matched controls. The MDADI was formally translated using the forward-backward method and feasibility, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, score distribution, known-group validity, and patient feedback and were analyzed. Criterion and convergent validities were tested against the previously validated dysphagia questionnaire F-EAT-10. The results showed good variability and no floor or ceiling effects in the dysphagic group (age range 31 to 85 years, mean 67.8, SD 11.2). In all MDADI subscales, the internal consistency reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8). Moreover, the intraclass correlation in test-retest (n = 55) was high (> 0.9) in all subscales. The MDADI was able to discriminate between dysphagic and non-dysphagic participants: the mean total score was 73.6 for the dysphagic group and 99.9 for the control group (p > 0.001). The correlations between the MDADI and the F-EAT-10 were strong demonstrating criterion and convergent validities. Patient feedback of the MDADI was positive. In conclusion, the Finnish MDADI is a valid instrument to assess dysphagia-related quality of life in patients with HNC, offering enhanced clinical and research utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"18980"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Finnish MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Pihla Ranta, Ilpo Kinnunen, Heikki Irjala\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-03616-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire into Finnish and validate it in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). A total of 94 participants were included: 64 dysphagic HNC patients and 30 non-dysphagic age- and gender-matched controls. The MDADI was formally translated using the forward-backward method and feasibility, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, score distribution, known-group validity, and patient feedback and were analyzed. Criterion and convergent validities were tested against the previously validated dysphagia questionnaire F-EAT-10. The results showed good variability and no floor or ceiling effects in the dysphagic group (age range 31 to 85 years, mean 67.8, SD 11.2). In all MDADI subscales, the internal consistency reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8). Moreover, the intraclass correlation in test-retest (n = 55) was high (> 0.9) in all subscales. The MDADI was able to discriminate between dysphagic and non-dysphagic participants: the mean total score was 73.6 for the dysphagic group and 99.9 for the control group (p > 0.001). The correlations between the MDADI and the F-EAT-10 were strong demonstrating criterion and convergent validities. Patient feedback of the MDADI was positive. In conclusion, the Finnish MDADI is a valid instrument to assess dysphagia-related quality of life in patients with HNC, offering enhanced clinical and research utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"18980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125162/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03616-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03616-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是将MD安德森吞咽困难量表(MDADI)翻译成芬兰语,并在头颈癌(HNC)患者中进行验证。总共包括94名参与者:64名吞咽困难的HNC患者和30名年龄和性别匹配的非吞咽困难对照组。采用前向-后向法对MDADI进行正式翻译,并对可行性、重测信度、内部一致性、评分分布、已知组效度、患者反馈进行分析。根据先前验证的吞咽困难问卷F-EAT-10测试标准效度和收敛效度。结果显示良好的可变性,在吞咽困难组(年龄范围31 - 85岁,平均67.8岁,标准差11.2)中没有下限或上限效应。在所有MDADI分量表中,内部一致性信度较高(Cronbach's alpha > 0.8)。此外,在所有子量表中,重测测试(n = 55)的类内相关性都很高(> 0.9)。mddi能够区分吞咽困难和非吞咽困难参与者:吞咽困难组的平均总分为73.6分,对照组的平均总分为99.9分(p < 0.001)。MDADI与F-EAT-10的相关性具有较强的准则性和收敛效度。患者对MDADI的反馈是积极的。总之,芬兰mddi是评估HNC患者吞咽困难相关生活质量的有效工具,提供了增强的临床和研究效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of the Finnish MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer.

Validation of the Finnish MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer.

Validation of the Finnish MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer.

The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire into Finnish and validate it in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). A total of 94 participants were included: 64 dysphagic HNC patients and 30 non-dysphagic age- and gender-matched controls. The MDADI was formally translated using the forward-backward method and feasibility, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, score distribution, known-group validity, and patient feedback and were analyzed. Criterion and convergent validities were tested against the previously validated dysphagia questionnaire F-EAT-10. The results showed good variability and no floor or ceiling effects in the dysphagic group (age range 31 to 85 years, mean 67.8, SD 11.2). In all MDADI subscales, the internal consistency reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8). Moreover, the intraclass correlation in test-retest (n = 55) was high (> 0.9) in all subscales. The MDADI was able to discriminate between dysphagic and non-dysphagic participants: the mean total score was 73.6 for the dysphagic group and 99.9 for the control group (p > 0.001). The correlations between the MDADI and the F-EAT-10 were strong demonstrating criterion and convergent validities. Patient feedback of the MDADI was positive. In conclusion, the Finnish MDADI is a valid instrument to assess dysphagia-related quality of life in patients with HNC, offering enhanced clinical and research utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信