在三维种植体-组织-口腔-细菌-生物膜模型中,抗菌治疗剂对生物膜-组织相互作用的影响。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Carina Mikolai, Kathrin Wöll, Muhammad Imran Rahim, Andreas Winkel, Christine S Falk, Meike Stiesch
{"title":"在三维种植体-组织-口腔-细菌-生物膜模型中,抗菌治疗剂对生物膜-组织相互作用的影响。","authors":"Carina Mikolai, Kathrin Wöll, Muhammad Imran Rahim, Andreas Winkel, Christine S Falk, Meike Stiesch","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-03855-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacterial biofilms on dental implants can lead to peri-implant infections and demonstrate a remarkable ability to evade host immunity and resist antibiotics. Advanced in vitro models, such as the three-dimensional implant-tissue-oral-bacterial-biofilm model (INTER<sub>b</sub>ACT), are essential to evaluate antibiofilm efficacy. The INTER<sub>b</sub>ACT model, effectively reproduces the complex triangular interactions between an organotypic oral mucosa, an integrated implant and an oral multispecies biofilms, in the peri-implant situation. Here, we investigated the effect of antibacterial agents (chlorhexidine, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and metronidazole) on biofilm-tissue interactions in the INTER<sub>b</sub>ACT model. While the antibacterial interventions had no effect on biofilm volume, all agents decreased the proportion of viable bacteria, underscoring their effect on bacterial viability despite biofilm resilience. Biofilm exposure to untreated tissues caused epithelial damage, whereas all antibacterial agents preserved epithelial integrity. However, the modulation of pro-inflammatory response differed between the various agents. All antibacterial treatments reduced hBD-2 and TIMP-1 levels. While doxycycline decreased IL-1β and CCL20, chlorhexidine lowered TNF-α level. In conclusion, the INTER<sub>b</sub>ACT model allowed the successful assessment of antibacterial efficacy, elucidation of biofilm resistance and characterization of inflammation during peri-implant tissue-biofilm interactions. This validation highlights the model's potential as a platform for developing and evaluating new therapeutic strategies for peri-implant diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"18979"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of antibacterial therapeutic agents on biofilm-tissue interactions in a 3D implant-tissue-oral-bacterial-biofilm model.\",\"authors\":\"Carina Mikolai, Kathrin Wöll, Muhammad Imran Rahim, Andreas Winkel, Christine S Falk, Meike Stiesch\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-03855-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bacterial biofilms on dental implants can lead to peri-implant infections and demonstrate a remarkable ability to evade host immunity and resist antibiotics. Advanced in vitro models, such as the three-dimensional implant-tissue-oral-bacterial-biofilm model (INTER<sub>b</sub>ACT), are essential to evaluate antibiofilm efficacy. The INTER<sub>b</sub>ACT model, effectively reproduces the complex triangular interactions between an organotypic oral mucosa, an integrated implant and an oral multispecies biofilms, in the peri-implant situation. Here, we investigated the effect of antibacterial agents (chlorhexidine, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and metronidazole) on biofilm-tissue interactions in the INTER<sub>b</sub>ACT model. While the antibacterial interventions had no effect on biofilm volume, all agents decreased the proportion of viable bacteria, underscoring their effect on bacterial viability despite biofilm resilience. Biofilm exposure to untreated tissues caused epithelial damage, whereas all antibacterial agents preserved epithelial integrity. However, the modulation of pro-inflammatory response differed between the various agents. All antibacterial treatments reduced hBD-2 and TIMP-1 levels. While doxycycline decreased IL-1β and CCL20, chlorhexidine lowered TNF-α level. In conclusion, the INTER<sub>b</sub>ACT model allowed the successful assessment of antibacterial efficacy, elucidation of biofilm resistance and characterization of inflammation during peri-implant tissue-biofilm interactions. This validation highlights the model's potential as a platform for developing and evaluating new therapeutic strategies for peri-implant diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"18979\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125177/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03855-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03855-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙种植体上的细菌生物膜可导致种植体周围感染,并表现出逃避宿主免疫和抵抗抗生素的显著能力。先进的体外模型,如三维种植体-组织-口腔-细菌-生物膜模型(INTERbACT),对于评估抗生素膜的疗效至关重要。INTERbACT模型有效地再现了种植体周围情况下有机型口腔黏膜、一体化种植体和口腔多物种生物膜之间复杂的三角相互作用。在INTERbACT模型中,我们研究了抗菌药物(氯己定、阿莫西林、环丙沙星、多西环素和甲硝唑)对生物膜-组织相互作用的影响。虽然抗菌干预对生物膜体积没有影响,但所有药物都降低了活菌的比例,强调了它们对细菌活力的影响,尽管生物膜具有弹性。生物膜暴露于未经处理的组织引起上皮损伤,而所有抗菌剂都能保持上皮的完整性。然而,不同药物对促炎反应的调节不同。所有抗菌药物均可降低hBD-2和TIMP-1水平。强力霉素降低IL-1β和CCL20水平,氯己定降低TNF-α水平。总之,INTERbACT模型可以成功评估抗菌效果,阐明生物膜耐药性,并表征种植体周围组织-生物膜相互作用过程中的炎症。这一验证突出了该模型作为开发和评估种植体周围疾病新治疗策略平台的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of antibacterial therapeutic agents on biofilm-tissue interactions in a 3D implant-tissue-oral-bacterial-biofilm model.

Impact of antibacterial therapeutic agents on biofilm-tissue interactions in a 3D implant-tissue-oral-bacterial-biofilm model.

Impact of antibacterial therapeutic agents on biofilm-tissue interactions in a 3D implant-tissue-oral-bacterial-biofilm model.

Impact of antibacterial therapeutic agents on biofilm-tissue interactions in a 3D implant-tissue-oral-bacterial-biofilm model.

Bacterial biofilms on dental implants can lead to peri-implant infections and demonstrate a remarkable ability to evade host immunity and resist antibiotics. Advanced in vitro models, such as the three-dimensional implant-tissue-oral-bacterial-biofilm model (INTERbACT), are essential to evaluate antibiofilm efficacy. The INTERbACT model, effectively reproduces the complex triangular interactions between an organotypic oral mucosa, an integrated implant and an oral multispecies biofilms, in the peri-implant situation. Here, we investigated the effect of antibacterial agents (chlorhexidine, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and metronidazole) on biofilm-tissue interactions in the INTERbACT model. While the antibacterial interventions had no effect on biofilm volume, all agents decreased the proportion of viable bacteria, underscoring their effect on bacterial viability despite biofilm resilience. Biofilm exposure to untreated tissues caused epithelial damage, whereas all antibacterial agents preserved epithelial integrity. However, the modulation of pro-inflammatory response differed between the various agents. All antibacterial treatments reduced hBD-2 and TIMP-1 levels. While doxycycline decreased IL-1β and CCL20, chlorhexidine lowered TNF-α level. In conclusion, the INTERbACT model allowed the successful assessment of antibacterial efficacy, elucidation of biofilm resistance and characterization of inflammation during peri-implant tissue-biofilm interactions. This validation highlights the model's potential as a platform for developing and evaluating new therapeutic strategies for peri-implant diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信