Josefine B H Adelhelm, Charlotte S Jørgensen, Heidi B Hansen, Stine B Østertoft, Mads Nybo, Louise H Jørgensen
{"title":"用于血糖监测的cobas®脉搏即时检测设备的验证。","authors":"Josefine B H Adelhelm, Charlotte S Jørgensen, Heidi B Hansen, Stine B Østertoft, Mads Nybo, Louise H Jørgensen","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2512382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to validate the blood glucose point-of-care system, cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH), which is the successor to the Accu-Chek<sup>®</sup> Inform II system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Since the cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse device is intended to replace an existing device from the same manufacturer, we found it highly relevant to perform an industry-independent validation regarding accuracy and comparability with existing glucose measurement systems. From 40 randomly selected, non-fasting adults capillary and venous blood was drawn simultaneously. Correlation and agreement was evaluated by comparing capillary blood glucose on cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse to plasma glucose on cobas<sup>®</sup> 8000 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and capillary blood glucose on ABL800 Flex (Radiometer, Denmark), respectively. The cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse generally showed good agreement with both comparison methods, although the agreement between cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse and ABL800 Flex was better (bias -0.01 mmol/L) than between cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse and cobas<sup>®</sup> 8000 (bias 0.61 mmol/L). Differences between measurements of low blood glucose levels (range 0.5 to 4.8 mmol/L) and higher blood glucose levels (range 9.7 to 15.3 mmol/L) when comparing cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse to ABL800 Flex was also within allowable limits. Altogether, the validation study demonstrated a clinically satisfactory performance of the cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse point-of-care device.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse point-of-care testing device for blood glucose monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Josefine B H Adelhelm, Charlotte S Jørgensen, Heidi B Hansen, Stine B Østertoft, Mads Nybo, Louise H Jørgensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2025.2512382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to validate the blood glucose point-of-care system, cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH), which is the successor to the Accu-Chek<sup>®</sup> Inform II system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Since the cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse device is intended to replace an existing device from the same manufacturer, we found it highly relevant to perform an industry-independent validation regarding accuracy and comparability with existing glucose measurement systems. From 40 randomly selected, non-fasting adults capillary and venous blood was drawn simultaneously. Correlation and agreement was evaluated by comparing capillary blood glucose on cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse to plasma glucose on cobas<sup>®</sup> 8000 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and capillary blood glucose on ABL800 Flex (Radiometer, Denmark), respectively. The cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse generally showed good agreement with both comparison methods, although the agreement between cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse and ABL800 Flex was better (bias -0.01 mmol/L) than between cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse and cobas<sup>®</sup> 8000 (bias 0.61 mmol/L). Differences between measurements of low blood glucose levels (range 0.5 to 4.8 mmol/L) and higher blood glucose levels (range 9.7 to 15.3 mmol/L) when comparing cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse to ABL800 Flex was also within allowable limits. Altogether, the validation study demonstrated a clinically satisfactory performance of the cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse point-of-care device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2512382\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2512382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of cobas® pulse point-of-care testing device for blood glucose monitoring.
The aim of this study was to validate the blood glucose point-of-care system, cobas® pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH), which is the successor to the Accu-Chek® Inform II system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Since the cobas® pulse device is intended to replace an existing device from the same manufacturer, we found it highly relevant to perform an industry-independent validation regarding accuracy and comparability with existing glucose measurement systems. From 40 randomly selected, non-fasting adults capillary and venous blood was drawn simultaneously. Correlation and agreement was evaluated by comparing capillary blood glucose on cobas® pulse to plasma glucose on cobas® 8000 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and capillary blood glucose on ABL800 Flex (Radiometer, Denmark), respectively. The cobas® pulse generally showed good agreement with both comparison methods, although the agreement between cobas® pulse and ABL800 Flex was better (bias -0.01 mmol/L) than between cobas® pulse and cobas® 8000 (bias 0.61 mmol/L). Differences between measurements of low blood glucose levels (range 0.5 to 4.8 mmol/L) and higher blood glucose levels (range 9.7 to 15.3 mmol/L) when comparing cobas® pulse to ABL800 Flex was also within allowable limits. Altogether, the validation study demonstrated a clinically satisfactory performance of the cobas® pulse point-of-care device.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry.
The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.