用于血糖监测的cobas®脉搏即时检测设备的验证。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Josefine B H Adelhelm, Charlotte S Jørgensen, Heidi B Hansen, Stine B Østertoft, Mads Nybo, Louise H Jørgensen
{"title":"用于血糖监测的cobas®脉搏即时检测设备的验证。","authors":"Josefine B H Adelhelm, Charlotte S Jørgensen, Heidi B Hansen, Stine B Østertoft, Mads Nybo, Louise H Jørgensen","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2512382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to validate the blood glucose point-of-care system, cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH), which is the successor to the Accu-Chek<sup>®</sup> Inform II system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Since the cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse device is intended to replace an existing device from the same manufacturer, we found it highly relevant to perform an industry-independent validation regarding accuracy and comparability with existing glucose measurement systems. From 40 randomly selected, non-fasting adults capillary and venous blood was drawn simultaneously. Correlation and agreement was evaluated by comparing capillary blood glucose on cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse to plasma glucose on cobas<sup>®</sup> 8000 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and capillary blood glucose on ABL800 Flex (Radiometer, Denmark), respectively. The cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse generally showed good agreement with both comparison methods, although the agreement between cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse and ABL800 Flex was better (bias -0.01 mmol/L) than between cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse and cobas<sup>®</sup> 8000 (bias 0.61 mmol/L). Differences between measurements of low blood glucose levels (range 0.5 to 4.8 mmol/L) and higher blood glucose levels (range 9.7 to 15.3 mmol/L) when comparing cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse to ABL800 Flex was also within allowable limits. Altogether, the validation study demonstrated a clinically satisfactory performance of the cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse point-of-care device.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse point-of-care testing device for blood glucose monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Josefine B H Adelhelm, Charlotte S Jørgensen, Heidi B Hansen, Stine B Østertoft, Mads Nybo, Louise H Jørgensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2025.2512382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to validate the blood glucose point-of-care system, cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH), which is the successor to the Accu-Chek<sup>®</sup> Inform II system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Since the cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse device is intended to replace an existing device from the same manufacturer, we found it highly relevant to perform an industry-independent validation regarding accuracy and comparability with existing glucose measurement systems. From 40 randomly selected, non-fasting adults capillary and venous blood was drawn simultaneously. Correlation and agreement was evaluated by comparing capillary blood glucose on cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse to plasma glucose on cobas<sup>®</sup> 8000 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and capillary blood glucose on ABL800 Flex (Radiometer, Denmark), respectively. The cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse generally showed good agreement with both comparison methods, although the agreement between cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse and ABL800 Flex was better (bias -0.01 mmol/L) than between cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse and cobas<sup>®</sup> 8000 (bias 0.61 mmol/L). Differences between measurements of low blood glucose levels (range 0.5 to 4.8 mmol/L) and higher blood glucose levels (range 9.7 to 15.3 mmol/L) when comparing cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse to ABL800 Flex was also within allowable limits. Altogether, the validation study demonstrated a clinically satisfactory performance of the cobas<sup>®</sup> pulse point-of-care device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2512382\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2512382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是验证血糖护理点系统cobas®pulse(罗氏诊断有限公司),该系统是Accu-Chek®Inform II系统(罗氏诊断有限公司)的继任者。由于cobas®脉冲设备旨在取代来自同一制造商的现有设备,我们发现与现有葡萄糖测量系统的准确性和可比性进行行业独立验证是高度相关的。随机抽取40例非空腹成人同时抽取毛细血管和静脉血。通过比较cobas®脉冲上的毛细血管血糖与cobas®8000 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH)上的血浆血糖和ABL800 Flex (Radiometer,丹麦)上的毛细血管血糖,分别评估相关性和一致性。虽然cobas®脉冲与ABL800 Flex之间的一致性(偏差为-0.01 mmol/L)优于cobas®脉冲与cobas®8000之间的一致性(偏差为0.61 mmol/L),但cobas®脉冲与ABL800 Flex之间的一致性通常与两种比较方法一致。当比较cobas®脉冲与ABL800 Flex时,低血糖水平(范围0.5至4.8 mmol/L)和高血糖水平(范围9.7至15.3 mmol/L)的测量值之间的差异也在允许范围内。总之,验证研究证明了cobas®脉冲护理点设备的临床令人满意的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of cobas® pulse point-of-care testing device for blood glucose monitoring.

The aim of this study was to validate the blood glucose point-of-care system, cobas® pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH), which is the successor to the Accu-Chek® Inform II system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Since the cobas® pulse device is intended to replace an existing device from the same manufacturer, we found it highly relevant to perform an industry-independent validation regarding accuracy and comparability with existing glucose measurement systems. From 40 randomly selected, non-fasting adults capillary and venous blood was drawn simultaneously. Correlation and agreement was evaluated by comparing capillary blood glucose on cobas® pulse to plasma glucose on cobas® 8000 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and capillary blood glucose on ABL800 Flex (Radiometer, Denmark), respectively. The cobas® pulse generally showed good agreement with both comparison methods, although the agreement between cobas® pulse and ABL800 Flex was better (bias -0.01 mmol/L) than between cobas® pulse and cobas® 8000 (bias 0.61 mmol/L). Differences between measurements of low blood glucose levels (range 0.5 to 4.8 mmol/L) and higher blood glucose levels (range 9.7 to 15.3 mmol/L) when comparing cobas® pulse to ABL800 Flex was also within allowable limits. Altogether, the validation study demonstrated a clinically satisfactory performance of the cobas® pulse point-of-care device.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信