Wesley N Almeida, Kamila S Barros, Sérgio L G Nogueira-Filho, Selene S C Nogueira
{"title":"通过鸣叫评估人类活动对濒危岩豚鼠栖息地的影响。","authors":"Wesley N Almeida, Kamila S Barros, Sérgio L G Nogueira-Filho, Selene S C Nogueira","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acoustic monitoring is emerging as a key tool in wildlife conservation, especially for species in inaccessible habitats like the rock cavy (Kerodon rupestris), an endangered species native to Brazil's threatened Caatinga biome. Emotional stress from threatening situations affects breathing, heart rate, and vocal muscle tension, altering vocal acoustic parameters. This allows researchers to gauge the animal's environmental perception through its vocalizations. We aimed to evaluate emotional disturbance indicators in free-range rock cavies' vocalizations to suggest an acoustic index during threats. We compared calls from rock cavies in two areas with similar habitats but that differ in terms of anthropic impacts. Area 1 (A1) is near urban areas and disturbed by livestock and dogs, and Area 2 (A2) is farther from urban areas and free from human disturbance. Data on calls and behaviors were collected ad libitum in both areas. The alarm whistle call, making up 73.5% of total calls, was most common. Across 108 observation hours per area, 392 alarm whistle calls were recorded, with more calls in A1 than A2 (223 vs. 169; Chi-square = 29.44, DF = 1, P < 0.001). This resulted in a 32% higher hourly call rate in A1 (2.6 calls/h vs. 1.6 calls/h). Both male and female cavies in A1 had higher high-frequency (F1, 388 = 7.80, P = 0.005) and peak-frequency calls (F1, 388 = 21.32, P < 0.001). Given the similar landscape and resource availability in both areas, the differences in call emission rate and parameters are likely linked to emotional responses to human disturbances in A1. Thus, alarm whistle calls at an hourly rate of 2.6 calls/h or higher, with high-frequency and peak-frequency at or above 7222 Hz and 2603 Hz, can indicate anthropogenic disturbance in the Caatinga biome, aiding remote monitoring efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 5","pages":"e0323711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing anthropogenic impact on the habitat of threatened rock cavy (Kerodon rupestris) through its alarm calls.\",\"authors\":\"Wesley N Almeida, Kamila S Barros, Sérgio L G Nogueira-Filho, Selene S C Nogueira\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0323711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acoustic monitoring is emerging as a key tool in wildlife conservation, especially for species in inaccessible habitats like the rock cavy (Kerodon rupestris), an endangered species native to Brazil's threatened Caatinga biome. Emotional stress from threatening situations affects breathing, heart rate, and vocal muscle tension, altering vocal acoustic parameters. This allows researchers to gauge the animal's environmental perception through its vocalizations. We aimed to evaluate emotional disturbance indicators in free-range rock cavies' vocalizations to suggest an acoustic index during threats. We compared calls from rock cavies in two areas with similar habitats but that differ in terms of anthropic impacts. Area 1 (A1) is near urban areas and disturbed by livestock and dogs, and Area 2 (A2) is farther from urban areas and free from human disturbance. Data on calls and behaviors were collected ad libitum in both areas. The alarm whistle call, making up 73.5% of total calls, was most common. Across 108 observation hours per area, 392 alarm whistle calls were recorded, with more calls in A1 than A2 (223 vs. 169; Chi-square = 29.44, DF = 1, P < 0.001). This resulted in a 32% higher hourly call rate in A1 (2.6 calls/h vs. 1.6 calls/h). Both male and female cavies in A1 had higher high-frequency (F1, 388 = 7.80, P = 0.005) and peak-frequency calls (F1, 388 = 21.32, P < 0.001). Given the similar landscape and resource availability in both areas, the differences in call emission rate and parameters are likely linked to emotional responses to human disturbances in A1. Thus, alarm whistle calls at an hourly rate of 2.6 calls/h or higher, with high-frequency and peak-frequency at or above 7222 Hz and 2603 Hz, can indicate anthropogenic disturbance in the Caatinga biome, aiding remote monitoring efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"e0323711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323711\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
声学监测正在成为野生动物保护的关键工具,特别是对于那些难以进入栖息地的物种,比如岩鼠(kerdon rupestris),这是一种濒危物种,原生于巴西受威胁的Caatinga生物群系。来自威胁环境的情绪压力会影响呼吸、心率和声带肌肉紧张,改变声带参数。这使得研究人员可以通过动物的发声来衡量动物对环境的感知。我们的目的是评估自由放养岩洞发声中的情绪干扰指标,以提出威胁时的声学指标。我们比较了两个栖息地相似但在人为影响方面有所不同的地区的岩洞的叫声。区域1 (A1)靠近市区,受到牲畜和狗的干扰,区域2 (A2)远离市区,没有人为干扰。这两个地区的电话和行为数据都是随意收集的。警报哨声呼叫最常见,占呼叫总数的73.5%。在每个区域108个观察小时内,记录了392次报警哨声,A1比A2(223对169;卡方= 29.44,DF = 1, P
Assessing anthropogenic impact on the habitat of threatened rock cavy (Kerodon rupestris) through its alarm calls.
Acoustic monitoring is emerging as a key tool in wildlife conservation, especially for species in inaccessible habitats like the rock cavy (Kerodon rupestris), an endangered species native to Brazil's threatened Caatinga biome. Emotional stress from threatening situations affects breathing, heart rate, and vocal muscle tension, altering vocal acoustic parameters. This allows researchers to gauge the animal's environmental perception through its vocalizations. We aimed to evaluate emotional disturbance indicators in free-range rock cavies' vocalizations to suggest an acoustic index during threats. We compared calls from rock cavies in two areas with similar habitats but that differ in terms of anthropic impacts. Area 1 (A1) is near urban areas and disturbed by livestock and dogs, and Area 2 (A2) is farther from urban areas and free from human disturbance. Data on calls and behaviors were collected ad libitum in both areas. The alarm whistle call, making up 73.5% of total calls, was most common. Across 108 observation hours per area, 392 alarm whistle calls were recorded, with more calls in A1 than A2 (223 vs. 169; Chi-square = 29.44, DF = 1, P < 0.001). This resulted in a 32% higher hourly call rate in A1 (2.6 calls/h vs. 1.6 calls/h). Both male and female cavies in A1 had higher high-frequency (F1, 388 = 7.80, P = 0.005) and peak-frequency calls (F1, 388 = 21.32, P < 0.001). Given the similar landscape and resource availability in both areas, the differences in call emission rate and parameters are likely linked to emotional responses to human disturbances in A1. Thus, alarm whistle calls at an hourly rate of 2.6 calls/h or higher, with high-frequency and peak-frequency at or above 7222 Hz and 2603 Hz, can indicate anthropogenic disturbance in the Caatinga biome, aiding remote monitoring efforts.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage