在南非开普敦,旨在减少结核病确诊患者的初始随访损失(ILTFU)的系统追踪过程的经验教训。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323943
Nosivuyile Vanqa, Lario Viljoen, Graeme Hoddinott, Anneke Hesseling, Muhammad Osman, Sue-Ann Meehan
{"title":"在南非开普敦,旨在减少结核病确诊患者的初始随访损失(ILTFU)的系统追踪过程的经验教训。","authors":"Nosivuyile Vanqa, Lario Viljoen, Graeme Hoddinott, Anneke Hesseling, Muhammad Osman, Sue-Ann Meehan","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa is a high tuberculosis (TB) burdened country. People who are newly diagnosed with TB must link to a TB treatment facility and be registered in the electronic TB notification system for ongoing care. Delayed linkage to care increases the risk of disease progression, mortality, and ongoing TB transmission. We describe lessons from a systematic tracing process aimed to support linkage to care for people diagnosed with TB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used the Western Cape Provincial Health Data Centre (PHDC) to identify persons newly diagnosed with TB (January-December 2020) who were not recorded as linked to care after routine linking efforts, in one peri-urban health sub-district in Cape Town, South Africa. A systematic tracing process was followed, including visits to primary health care (PHC) facilities, and home visits for those with no evidence of linkage at PHC level. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Lessons learned during the process were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the PHDC, 406 persons diagnosed with TB had no evidence of being linked to TB care. Verification at PHC facilities found that 153/406 (38%) had linked to care. We traced 219 persons; of which107 (49%) could not be found. Overall, the PHDC showed 76% linkage among those traced and found and 72% among those not found. Lessons learned include the need for improved; (i) record keeping enabling the allocation of resources to patients who are truly lost to follow up, (ii) communication to improve patient understanding of timely treatment initiation and (iii) interpersonal relationships to encourage trust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The systematic tracing process was useful to understand the complexities around delayed linkage to care. To reduce ILTFU, we recommend, improving accuracy and timely recording of TB data, updating patient contact details regularly and strengthening interpersonal relations and communication between patients and healthcare workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 5","pages":"e0323943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from a systematic tracing process aimed to reduce initial loss to follow-up (ILTFU) among people diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in Cape Town, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Nosivuyile Vanqa, Lario Viljoen, Graeme Hoddinott, Anneke Hesseling, Muhammad Osman, Sue-Ann Meehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0323943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa is a high tuberculosis (TB) burdened country. People who are newly diagnosed with TB must link to a TB treatment facility and be registered in the electronic TB notification system for ongoing care. Delayed linkage to care increases the risk of disease progression, mortality, and ongoing TB transmission. We describe lessons from a systematic tracing process aimed to support linkage to care for people diagnosed with TB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used the Western Cape Provincial Health Data Centre (PHDC) to identify persons newly diagnosed with TB (January-December 2020) who were not recorded as linked to care after routine linking efforts, in one peri-urban health sub-district in Cape Town, South Africa. A systematic tracing process was followed, including visits to primary health care (PHC) facilities, and home visits for those with no evidence of linkage at PHC level. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Lessons learned during the process were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the PHDC, 406 persons diagnosed with TB had no evidence of being linked to TB care. Verification at PHC facilities found that 153/406 (38%) had linked to care. We traced 219 persons; of which107 (49%) could not be found. Overall, the PHDC showed 76% linkage among those traced and found and 72% among those not found. Lessons learned include the need for improved; (i) record keeping enabling the allocation of resources to patients who are truly lost to follow up, (ii) communication to improve patient understanding of timely treatment initiation and (iii) interpersonal relationships to encourage trust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The systematic tracing process was useful to understand the complexities around delayed linkage to care. To reduce ILTFU, we recommend, improving accuracy and timely recording of TB data, updating patient contact details regularly and strengthening interpersonal relations and communication between patients and healthcare workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"e0323943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323943\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:南非是结核病高负担国家。新诊断为结核病的人必须与结核病治疗机构联系,并在结核病电子通报系统中登记,以便进行持续治疗。延迟就医会增加疾病进展、死亡率和结核病持续传播的风险。我们描述了旨在支持与结核病诊断者的护理联系的系统追踪过程的经验教训。方法:该研究使用西开普省卫生数据中心(PHDC)识别新诊断为结核病的人(2020年1月至12月),这些人在南非开普敦的一个城郊卫生分区进行常规连接工作后未被记录为与护理相关。采取了系统的追踪过程,包括对初级卫生保健设施进行访问,并对那些没有证据表明与初级卫生保健有联系的人进行家访。采用描述性统计分析定量数据。在此过程中吸取的经验教训被记录下来。结果:在PHDC中,406名被诊断为结核病的人没有证据表明与结核病治疗有关。在初级保健设施进行的核查发现,153/406例(38%)与护理有关。我们追踪了219人;其中107个(49%)找不到。总体而言,PHDC在被追踪和发现的人群中有76%的关联,在未被发现的人群中有72%的关联。吸取的教训包括需要改进;(i)保存记录,以便将资源分配给真正失去随访的患者;(ii)沟通,以提高患者对及时开始治疗的理解;(iii)人际关系,以鼓励信任。结论:系统的追踪过程有助于了解延迟就医的复杂性。为了减少ILTFU,我们建议提高结核病数据记录的准确性和及时性,定期更新患者联系方式,加强患者与医护人员之间的人际关系和沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lessons from a systematic tracing process aimed to reduce initial loss to follow-up (ILTFU) among people diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in Cape Town, South Africa.

Lessons from a systematic tracing process aimed to reduce initial loss to follow-up (ILTFU) among people diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in Cape Town, South Africa.

Lessons from a systematic tracing process aimed to reduce initial loss to follow-up (ILTFU) among people diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in Cape Town, South Africa.

Lessons from a systematic tracing process aimed to reduce initial loss to follow-up (ILTFU) among people diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in Cape Town, South Africa.

Background: South Africa is a high tuberculosis (TB) burdened country. People who are newly diagnosed with TB must link to a TB treatment facility and be registered in the electronic TB notification system for ongoing care. Delayed linkage to care increases the risk of disease progression, mortality, and ongoing TB transmission. We describe lessons from a systematic tracing process aimed to support linkage to care for people diagnosed with TB.

Methods: The study used the Western Cape Provincial Health Data Centre (PHDC) to identify persons newly diagnosed with TB (January-December 2020) who were not recorded as linked to care after routine linking efforts, in one peri-urban health sub-district in Cape Town, South Africa. A systematic tracing process was followed, including visits to primary health care (PHC) facilities, and home visits for those with no evidence of linkage at PHC level. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Lessons learned during the process were documented.

Results: Within the PHDC, 406 persons diagnosed with TB had no evidence of being linked to TB care. Verification at PHC facilities found that 153/406 (38%) had linked to care. We traced 219 persons; of which107 (49%) could not be found. Overall, the PHDC showed 76% linkage among those traced and found and 72% among those not found. Lessons learned include the need for improved; (i) record keeping enabling the allocation of resources to patients who are truly lost to follow up, (ii) communication to improve patient understanding of timely treatment initiation and (iii) interpersonal relationships to encourage trust.

Conclusion: The systematic tracing process was useful to understand the complexities around delayed linkage to care. To reduce ILTFU, we recommend, improving accuracy and timely recording of TB data, updating patient contact details regularly and strengthening interpersonal relations and communication between patients and healthcare workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信