全球膳食质量评分(GDQS)-膳食和GDQS-菜单指标:如何衡量机构喂养计划中的膳食和菜单质量。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Winnie Bell, Mia M Blakstad, Peiman Milani, Megan Deitchler
{"title":"全球膳食质量评分(GDQS)-膳食和GDQS-菜单指标:如何衡量机构喂养计划中的膳食和菜单质量。","authors":"Winnie Bell, Mia M Blakstad, Peiman Milani, Megan Deitchler","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To achieve equitable, environmentally sustainable, and nutritious food systems, transformational change is needed. One potential path to such change is through institutional feeding programs, such as schools feeding. Despite the wide reach of institutional feeding programs there has not until recently been a simple yet rigorous metric that can measure, track, and evaluate the nutritional quality of the meals and menus. This lack of standardized measurement is particularly noticeable in low- and middle-income countries, with the implication that the relative contribution of institutional feeding programs towards reducing malnutrition or how to invest to maximize impact remains largely unknown. The Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS)-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics were designed to fill this gap and to enable consistent and accurate tracking of the nutritional quality of meals and menus around the world. Derived from the existing Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS) metric, the GDQS-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics assign a point total for the overall nutritional quality of a meal or menu based on its performance of four sub-metrics: 1) Healthy GDQS-Meal (or Menu), 2) Unhealthy GDQS-Meal (or Menu), 3) Fortification and Biofortification, and 4) Food Group Diversity. The metrics were designed to be low-burden and easy-to-use while maintaining scientific rigor for individuals of all ages in schools and across other institutional feeding programs such as prisons and workplace cafeterias. Results from the GDQS-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics can be used for identification of simple substitutions for healthier meal and menu options, enforcement of meal quality standards, benchmarking, educational purposes, and advocacy efforts to encourage institutional feeding programs to invest in healthier meal and menu options.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":"83 Supplement_1","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS)-Meal and GDQS-Menu Metrics: How to Measure Meal and Menu Quality in Institutional Feeding Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Bell, Mia M Blakstad, Peiman Milani, Megan Deitchler\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To achieve equitable, environmentally sustainable, and nutritious food systems, transformational change is needed. One potential path to such change is through institutional feeding programs, such as schools feeding. Despite the wide reach of institutional feeding programs there has not until recently been a simple yet rigorous metric that can measure, track, and evaluate the nutritional quality of the meals and menus. This lack of standardized measurement is particularly noticeable in low- and middle-income countries, with the implication that the relative contribution of institutional feeding programs towards reducing malnutrition or how to invest to maximize impact remains largely unknown. The Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS)-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics were designed to fill this gap and to enable consistent and accurate tracking of the nutritional quality of meals and menus around the world. Derived from the existing Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS) metric, the GDQS-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics assign a point total for the overall nutritional quality of a meal or menu based on its performance of four sub-metrics: 1) Healthy GDQS-Meal (or Menu), 2) Unhealthy GDQS-Meal (or Menu), 3) Fortification and Biofortification, and 4) Food Group Diversity. The metrics were designed to be low-burden and easy-to-use while maintaining scientific rigor for individuals of all ages in schools and across other institutional feeding programs such as prisons and workplace cafeterias. Results from the GDQS-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics can be used for identification of simple substitutions for healthier meal and menu options, enforcement of meal quality standards, benchmarking, educational purposes, and advocacy efforts to encourage institutional feeding programs to invest in healthier meal and menu options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\"83 Supplement_1\",\"pages\":\"81-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现公平、环境可持续和营养丰富的粮食系统,需要进行转型变革。实现这种改变的一个潜在途径是通过机构供餐计划,比如学校供餐。尽管机构喂养计划的范围很广,但直到最近才出现了一种简单而严格的衡量标准,可以衡量、跟踪和评估膳食和菜单的营养质量。在低收入和中等收入国家,这种缺乏标准化衡量的情况尤为明显,这意味着机构喂养计划对减少营养不良的相对贡献或如何投资以最大化影响在很大程度上仍然未知。全球膳食质量评分(GDQS)-膳食和GDQS-菜单指标旨在填补这一空白,并能够对全球膳食和菜单的营养质量进行一致和准确的跟踪。GDQS- meal和GDQS- menu指标源自现有的全球饮食质量评分(GDQS)指标,根据膳食或菜单的四个子指标的表现,为膳食或菜单的整体营养质量分配一个积分:1)健康的GDQS- meal(或菜单),2)不健康的GDQS- meal(或菜单),3)强化和生物强化,4)食物组多样性。这些指标的设计负担低,易于使用,同时对学校和其他机构(如监狱和工作场所的食堂)的所有年龄段的个人保持科学的严谨性。GDQS-Meal和GDQS-Menu指标的结果可用于确定健康膳食和菜单选择的简单替代品,执行膳食质量标准,基准,教育目的,以及鼓励机构喂养计划投资于健康膳食和菜单选择的宣传工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS)-Meal and GDQS-Menu Metrics: How to Measure Meal and Menu Quality in Institutional Feeding Programs.

To achieve equitable, environmentally sustainable, and nutritious food systems, transformational change is needed. One potential path to such change is through institutional feeding programs, such as schools feeding. Despite the wide reach of institutional feeding programs there has not until recently been a simple yet rigorous metric that can measure, track, and evaluate the nutritional quality of the meals and menus. This lack of standardized measurement is particularly noticeable in low- and middle-income countries, with the implication that the relative contribution of institutional feeding programs towards reducing malnutrition or how to invest to maximize impact remains largely unknown. The Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS)-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics were designed to fill this gap and to enable consistent and accurate tracking of the nutritional quality of meals and menus around the world. Derived from the existing Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS) metric, the GDQS-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics assign a point total for the overall nutritional quality of a meal or menu based on its performance of four sub-metrics: 1) Healthy GDQS-Meal (or Menu), 2) Unhealthy GDQS-Meal (or Menu), 3) Fortification and Biofortification, and 4) Food Group Diversity. The metrics were designed to be low-burden and easy-to-use while maintaining scientific rigor for individuals of all ages in schools and across other institutional feeding programs such as prisons and workplace cafeterias. Results from the GDQS-Meal and GDQS-Menu metrics can be used for identification of simple substitutions for healthier meal and menu options, enforcement of meal quality standards, benchmarking, educational purposes, and advocacy efforts to encourage institutional feeding programs to invest in healthier meal and menu options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信