视频脑脉冲试验在急性前庭综合征卒中诊断中的准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nicola Ferri, Alessandro Bracci, Giacomo Metta Franceschelli, Giacomo Gnoli, Andrea Turolla, Paolo Pillastrini, Leonardo Manzari, Marco Tramontano
{"title":"视频脑脉冲试验在急性前庭综合征卒中诊断中的准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Nicola Ferri, Alessandro Bracci, Giacomo Metta Franceschelli, Giacomo Gnoli, Andrea Turolla, Paolo Pillastrini, Leonardo Manzari, Marco Tramontano","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13174-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertigo is a common symptom in people with acute stroke, leading to difficulty in the diagnostic process. This study aims to systematically report the accuracy of the video head impulse test (vHIT) for diagnosing stroke in individuals presenting to emergency departments with acute vertigo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and gray literature were searched from inception to July 2024 without language limits. Independent researchers created a contingency table to record the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. A bivariate analysis was performed to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. A quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 studies (905 participants) were included. EyeSeeCam (6/13) and Otometrics (6/13) were the most represented vHIT devices. The studies were of good quality, with the flow and timing being the more prevalent domain presenting a high risk of bias (7/13); however, there were no concerns about applicability. The vHIT had a specificity of 85% (95% CI, 61%-95%), sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 70%-92%), positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 5.56 (95% CI, 2.00-15.47), negative LR of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.10-0.35), and diagnostic odd ratio of 30.23 (95% CI, 8.96-102.06), making this test particularly useful for ruling out strokes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the value of vHIT as a complementary tool in early diagnosis of stroke. Thus, expertise in its use and interpretation should be promoted, and future primary studies are expected to refine and update this systematic review. Prospero registration CRD42024532776.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 6","pages":"436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of video head impulse test in stroke diagnosis during acute vestibular syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Ferri, Alessandro Bracci, Giacomo Metta Franceschelli, Giacomo Gnoli, Andrea Turolla, Paolo Pillastrini, Leonardo Manzari, Marco Tramontano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13174-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertigo is a common symptom in people with acute stroke, leading to difficulty in the diagnostic process. This study aims to systematically report the accuracy of the video head impulse test (vHIT) for diagnosing stroke in individuals presenting to emergency departments with acute vertigo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and gray literature were searched from inception to July 2024 without language limits. Independent researchers created a contingency table to record the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. A bivariate analysis was performed to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. A quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 studies (905 participants) were included. EyeSeeCam (6/13) and Otometrics (6/13) were the most represented vHIT devices. The studies were of good quality, with the flow and timing being the more prevalent domain presenting a high risk of bias (7/13); however, there were no concerns about applicability. The vHIT had a specificity of 85% (95% CI, 61%-95%), sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 70%-92%), positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 5.56 (95% CI, 2.00-15.47), negative LR of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.10-0.35), and diagnostic odd ratio of 30.23 (95% CI, 8.96-102.06), making this test particularly useful for ruling out strokes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the value of vHIT as a complementary tool in early diagnosis of stroke. Thus, expertise in its use and interpretation should be promoted, and future primary studies are expected to refine and update this systematic review. Prospero registration CRD42024532776.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 6\",\"pages\":\"436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13174-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13174-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眩晕是急性脑卒中患者的常见症状,导致诊断困难。本研究旨在系统地报告视频头部脉冲测试(vHIT)在急诊科诊断急性眩晕患者中风的准确性。方法:检索MEDLINE、CENTRAL、CINAHL、SCOPUS和灰色文献,检索时间自成立至2024年7月,无语言限制。独立研究人员创建了一个应急表,记录真阳性、假阳性、真阴性和假阴性的数量。进行双变量分析以估计总体敏感性和特异性。进行亚组分析和敏感性分析以探索异质性的来源。使用诊断试验准确性研究质量评估2工具进行质量评估。结果:纳入13项研究(905名受试者)。eyeeseecam(6/13)和Otometrics(6/13)是最具代表性的vHIT设备。这些研究质量良好,流和时间是更普遍的领域,存在较高的偏倚风险(7/13);然而,没有人担心适用性问题。vHIT的特异性为85% (95% CI, 61%-95%),敏感性为84% (95% CI, 70%-92%),阳性似然比(LR)为5.56 (95% CI, 2.00-15.47),阴性似然比为0.18 (95% CI, 0.10-0.35),诊断奇比为30.23 (95% CI, 8.96-102.06),使得该测试对排除中风特别有用。结论:本综述强调了vHIT作为脑卒中早期诊断的辅助工具的价值。因此,应促进其使用和解释方面的专门知识,未来的初步研究有望完善和更新这一系统审查。普洛斯彼罗注册CRD42024532776。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of video head impulse test in stroke diagnosis during acute vestibular syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Background: Vertigo is a common symptom in people with acute stroke, leading to difficulty in the diagnostic process. This study aims to systematically report the accuracy of the video head impulse test (vHIT) for diagnosing stroke in individuals presenting to emergency departments with acute vertigo.

Methods: Data from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and gray literature were searched from inception to July 2024 without language limits. Independent researchers created a contingency table to record the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. A bivariate analysis was performed to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. A quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies 2 tool.

Results: 13 studies (905 participants) were included. EyeSeeCam (6/13) and Otometrics (6/13) were the most represented vHIT devices. The studies were of good quality, with the flow and timing being the more prevalent domain presenting a high risk of bias (7/13); however, there were no concerns about applicability. The vHIT had a specificity of 85% (95% CI, 61%-95%), sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 70%-92%), positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 5.56 (95% CI, 2.00-15.47), negative LR of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.10-0.35), and diagnostic odd ratio of 30.23 (95% CI, 8.96-102.06), making this test particularly useful for ruling out strokes.

Conclusion: This review highlights the value of vHIT as a complementary tool in early diagnosis of stroke. Thus, expertise in its use and interpretation should be promoted, and future primary studies are expected to refine and update this systematic review. Prospero registration CRD42024532776.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信