在美国,卡吡嗪治疗重度抑郁症和双相I型障碍的实际效果。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2513766
Roger S McIntyre, Mousam Parikh, Jamie Ta, Simranpreet Waraich, Chandra Cohen-Stavi, Carl Marci, Nadia Nabulsi
{"title":"在美国,卡吡嗪治疗重度抑郁症和双相I型障碍的实际效果。","authors":"Roger S McIntyre, Mousam Parikh, Jamie Ta, Simranpreet Waraich, Chandra Cohen-Stavi, Carl Marci, Nadia Nabulsi","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2513766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The efficacy of cariprazine for major depressive disorder (MDD) (adjunctive therapy) and bipolar I (BP-I) depression has been demonstrated in clinical trials. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of cariprazine in reducing depression severity among patients with moderate-to-severe MDD or BP-I depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical/pharmacy claims and electronic medical records (EMRs) from specialty providers in the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud were used to identify adults with MDD or BP-I who initiated cariprazine (adjunctively for MDD) (first dispensing = index) and had ≥1 EMR and ≥1 claim during 12-month baseline and ≤12-month follow-up periods. Included patients had a baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 total score ≥10, reflecting at least moderate depressive symptoms. Follow-up continued until cariprazine discontinuation, alternate diagnosis (e.g. BP-I [MDD cohort] or MDD [BP-I cohort]), or 12 months post-index. Depression severity was assessed using PHQ-9 total scores that were observed or estimated from clinical notes using a previously validated machine learning algorithm. Analyses included mean change in PHQ-9 score from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. A sensitivity analysis using only observed PHQ-9 scores was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 754 patients at baseline, 396 had MDD (mean PHQ-9 = 16.4) and 358 had BP-I (mean PHQ-9 = 16.9). For patients with MDD, mean reductions in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months of adjunctive cariprazine treatment were 3.5 (95% CI: 2.7, 4.4; <i>n</i> = 127), 4.1 (2.9, 5.4; <i>n</i> = 87), and 3.7 (1.6, 5.8; <i>n</i> = 52), respectively. For patients with BP-I, mean reductions from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months were 5.2 (95% CI: 4.2, 6.2; <i>n</i> = 121), 6.5 (5.2, 7.8; <i>n</i> = 90), and 6.9 (5.2, 8.5; <i>n</i> = 54), respectively. Greater improvements were observed in the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world effectiveness study of cariprazine treatment for MDD (adjunctive use) or BP-I demonstrated clinically meaningful and sustained improvement in depression symptoms during short- and long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"885-898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness of cariprazine in major depressive disorder and bipolar I disorder in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Roger S McIntyre, Mousam Parikh, Jamie Ta, Simranpreet Waraich, Chandra Cohen-Stavi, Carl Marci, Nadia Nabulsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2513766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The efficacy of cariprazine for major depressive disorder (MDD) (adjunctive therapy) and bipolar I (BP-I) depression has been demonstrated in clinical trials. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of cariprazine in reducing depression severity among patients with moderate-to-severe MDD or BP-I depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical/pharmacy claims and electronic medical records (EMRs) from specialty providers in the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud were used to identify adults with MDD or BP-I who initiated cariprazine (adjunctively for MDD) (first dispensing = index) and had ≥1 EMR and ≥1 claim during 12-month baseline and ≤12-month follow-up periods. Included patients had a baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 total score ≥10, reflecting at least moderate depressive symptoms. Follow-up continued until cariprazine discontinuation, alternate diagnosis (e.g. BP-I [MDD cohort] or MDD [BP-I cohort]), or 12 months post-index. Depression severity was assessed using PHQ-9 total scores that were observed or estimated from clinical notes using a previously validated machine learning algorithm. Analyses included mean change in PHQ-9 score from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. A sensitivity analysis using only observed PHQ-9 scores was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 754 patients at baseline, 396 had MDD (mean PHQ-9 = 16.4) and 358 had BP-I (mean PHQ-9 = 16.9). For patients with MDD, mean reductions in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months of adjunctive cariprazine treatment were 3.5 (95% CI: 2.7, 4.4; <i>n</i> = 127), 4.1 (2.9, 5.4; <i>n</i> = 87), and 3.7 (1.6, 5.8; <i>n</i> = 52), respectively. For patients with BP-I, mean reductions from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months were 5.2 (95% CI: 4.2, 6.2; <i>n</i> = 121), 6.5 (5.2, 7.8; <i>n</i> = 90), and 6.9 (5.2, 8.5; <i>n</i> = 54), respectively. Greater improvements were observed in the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world effectiveness study of cariprazine treatment for MDD (adjunctive use) or BP-I demonstrated clinically meaningful and sustained improvement in depression symptoms during short- and long-term follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"885-898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2513766\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2513766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床试验证实了卡吡嗪治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)(辅助治疗)和双相I型抑郁症(BP-I)的疗效。本研究评估了卡吡嗪在减轻中度至重度重度重度抑郁症或BP-I型抑郁症患者抑郁严重程度方面的实际有效性。方法:使用来自OM1真实世界数据云中的专业供应商的医疗/药房索赔和电子医疗记录(EMR)来识别开始使用卡吡唑(辅助治疗MDD)(首次配药=指数)并且在12个月基线和≤12个月随访期间EMR≥1和索赔≥1的MDD或BP-I成人。纳入的患者基线患者健康问卷(PHQ)-9总分≥10分,至少反映中度抑郁症状。随访持续至卡吡嗪停药、替代诊断(如bp - 1 [MDD队列]或MDD [bp - 1队列])或指数后12个月。使用PHQ-9总分来评估抑郁症的严重程度,该总分是使用先前验证的机器学习算法从临床记录中观察或估计的。分析包括PHQ-9评分从基线到随访2、6和12个月的平均变化。仅使用观察到的PHQ-9评分进行敏感性分析。结果:基线时754例患者中,396例患有重度抑郁症(平均PHQ-9 = 16.4), 358例患有bp - 1(平均PHQ-9 = 16.9)。对于重度抑郁症患者,辅助卡吡嗪治疗2个月、6个月和12个月后,PHQ-9评分的平均降幅为3.5 (95% CI: 2.7, 4.4;N = 127), 4.1 (2.9, 5.4;N = 87), 3.7 (1.6, 5.8;N = 52)。对于bp - 1患者,从基线到2、6和12个月的平均减少量为5.2 (95% CI: 4.2, 6.2;N = 121), 6.5 (5.2, 7.8;N = 90)和6.9 (5.2,8.5;N = 54)。在敏感性分析中观察到更大的改善。结论:在短期和长期随访中,卡吡嗪治疗重度抑郁症(辅助使用)或BP-I的实际疗效研究显示,抑郁症状得到了临床有意义的持续改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world effectiveness of cariprazine in major depressive disorder and bipolar I disorder in the United States.

Aims: The efficacy of cariprazine for major depressive disorder (MDD) (adjunctive therapy) and bipolar I (BP-I) depression has been demonstrated in clinical trials. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of cariprazine in reducing depression severity among patients with moderate-to-severe MDD or BP-I depression.

Methods: Medical/pharmacy claims and electronic medical records (EMRs) from specialty providers in the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud were used to identify adults with MDD or BP-I who initiated cariprazine (adjunctively for MDD) (first dispensing = index) and had ≥1 EMR and ≥1 claim during 12-month baseline and ≤12-month follow-up periods. Included patients had a baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 total score ≥10, reflecting at least moderate depressive symptoms. Follow-up continued until cariprazine discontinuation, alternate diagnosis (e.g. BP-I [MDD cohort] or MDD [BP-I cohort]), or 12 months post-index. Depression severity was assessed using PHQ-9 total scores that were observed or estimated from clinical notes using a previously validated machine learning algorithm. Analyses included mean change in PHQ-9 score from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. A sensitivity analysis using only observed PHQ-9 scores was conducted.

Results: Of 754 patients at baseline, 396 had MDD (mean PHQ-9 = 16.4) and 358 had BP-I (mean PHQ-9 = 16.9). For patients with MDD, mean reductions in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months of adjunctive cariprazine treatment were 3.5 (95% CI: 2.7, 4.4; n = 127), 4.1 (2.9, 5.4; n = 87), and 3.7 (1.6, 5.8; n = 52), respectively. For patients with BP-I, mean reductions from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months were 5.2 (95% CI: 4.2, 6.2; n = 121), 6.5 (5.2, 7.8; n = 90), and 6.9 (5.2, 8.5; n = 54), respectively. Greater improvements were observed in the sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions: This real-world effectiveness study of cariprazine treatment for MDD (adjunctive use) or BP-I demonstrated clinically meaningful and sustained improvement in depression symptoms during short- and long-term follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信