Julia Baranowska, Daniel Oren, Andrea Fernandez Valledor, Matan Uriel, Changhee Lee, Cathrine Maria Moeller, Boaz Elad, Salwa Rahman, Adi Hertz, Devin Skoll, Matthew Regan, Ersilia M DeFilippis, Jayant Raikhelkar, Justin Fried, Dor Lotan, Kyung Taek Oh, David Bae, Afsana Rahman, Jason Choe, Kevin Clerkin, Adil A Yunis, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Paolo C Colombo, David Majure, Farhana Latif, Gabriel Sayer, Nir Uriel
{"title":"Belatacept在心脏移植受者中的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Julia Baranowska, Daniel Oren, Andrea Fernandez Valledor, Matan Uriel, Changhee Lee, Cathrine Maria Moeller, Boaz Elad, Salwa Rahman, Adi Hertz, Devin Skoll, Matthew Regan, Ersilia M DeFilippis, Jayant Raikhelkar, Justin Fried, Dor Lotan, Kyung Taek Oh, David Bae, Afsana Rahman, Jason Choe, Kevin Clerkin, Adil A Yunis, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Paolo C Colombo, David Majure, Farhana Latif, Gabriel Sayer, Nir Uriel","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2025.04.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary immunosuppressive regimens following heart transplantation (HT) are associated with nephrotoxicity. Additionally, some patients develop rejection despite standard immunosuppression, requiring augmentation. Belatacept (BTC) has demonstrated mortality and graft survival benefits while preserving renal function in kidney transplant recipients, but data regarding HT remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the utilization, safety, and efficacy of BTC-based therapy in HT recipients, comparing outcomes with patients managed under a standard immunosuppression protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study evaluated all adult HT recipients treated with BTC between October 2019 and August 2023. Patients were stratified by indication (renal-sparing or enhanced immunosuppression) and propensity-matched to controls receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy. Primary outcomes were survival free from clinically significant rejection and changes in renal function post-BTC initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BTC was started in 64 patients at a median of 20 [IQR 7-66] months following transplant (37 renal-sparing, 27 immunological). Median age was 51 years and 59% were male. Over a median follow-up of 26 months, rejection free survival was similar between BTC patients and controls (p=0.44). BTC initiation led to improved renal function, with increase in GFR from 38 to 43 ml/min/1.73m² (p=0.04). Infections occurred in 20% of BTC patients. EBV viremia occurred more frequently post-BTC initiation than before (40.6% vs. 7.8%, p<0.001). BTC treatment was associated with 98.5% 2-year survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BTC may safely be used as an adjunct immunosuppressive agent in HT recipients with renal dysfunction or elevated immunological risk. A BTC-based regimen is associated with improved renal function compared to a standard regimen based on calcineurin inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Belatacept in Heart Transplant Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Baranowska, Daniel Oren, Andrea Fernandez Valledor, Matan Uriel, Changhee Lee, Cathrine Maria Moeller, Boaz Elad, Salwa Rahman, Adi Hertz, Devin Skoll, Matthew Regan, Ersilia M DeFilippis, Jayant Raikhelkar, Justin Fried, Dor Lotan, Kyung Taek Oh, David Bae, Afsana Rahman, Jason Choe, Kevin Clerkin, Adil A Yunis, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Paolo C Colombo, David Majure, Farhana Latif, Gabriel Sayer, Nir Uriel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healun.2025.04.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary immunosuppressive regimens following heart transplantation (HT) are associated with nephrotoxicity. Additionally, some patients develop rejection despite standard immunosuppression, requiring augmentation. Belatacept (BTC) has demonstrated mortality and graft survival benefits while preserving renal function in kidney transplant recipients, but data regarding HT remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the utilization, safety, and efficacy of BTC-based therapy in HT recipients, comparing outcomes with patients managed under a standard immunosuppression protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study evaluated all adult HT recipients treated with BTC between October 2019 and August 2023. Patients were stratified by indication (renal-sparing or enhanced immunosuppression) and propensity-matched to controls receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy. Primary outcomes were survival free from clinically significant rejection and changes in renal function post-BTC initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BTC was started in 64 patients at a median of 20 [IQR 7-66] months following transplant (37 renal-sparing, 27 immunological). Median age was 51 years and 59% were male. Over a median follow-up of 26 months, rejection free survival was similar between BTC patients and controls (p=0.44). BTC initiation led to improved renal function, with increase in GFR from 38 to 43 ml/min/1.73m² (p=0.04). Infections occurred in 20% of BTC patients. EBV viremia occurred more frequently post-BTC initiation than before (40.6% vs. 7.8%, p<0.001). BTC treatment was associated with 98.5% 2-year survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BTC may safely be used as an adjunct immunosuppressive agent in HT recipients with renal dysfunction or elevated immunological risk. A BTC-based regimen is associated with improved renal function compared to a standard regimen based on calcineurin inhibitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2025.04.023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2025.04.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:当代心脏移植(HT)后免疫抑制方案与肾毒性有关。此外,尽管标准的免疫抑制,一些患者仍出现排斥反应,需要增强免疫。在肾移植受者中,Belatacept (BTC)在保留肾功能的同时具有降低死亡率和降低移植物存活率的优势,但关于HT的数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估以btc为基础的治疗在HT患者中的应用、安全性和有效性,并将结果与采用标准免疫抑制方案的患者进行比较。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究评估了2019年10月至2023年8月期间接受BTC治疗的所有成人HT受体。根据适应症(保留肾脏或增强免疫抑制)对患者进行分层,并与接受标准免疫抑制治疗的对照组相匹配。主要结局是无临床排斥反应的生存和btc开始后肾功能的改变。结果:64例患者在移植后中位数为20 [IQR 7-66]个月开始BTC(37例肾保留,27例免疫)。中位年龄为51岁,59%为男性。在26个月的中位随访中,BTC患者和对照组的无排斥生存相似(p=0.44)。BTC起始导致肾功能改善,GFR从38增加到43 ml/min/1.73m²(p=0.04)。20%的BTC患者发生感染。BTC启动后EBV病毒血症发生率高于BTC启动前(40.6% vs. 7.8%)。结论:BTC可安全用于肾功能不全或免疫风险升高的HT受体的辅助免疫抑制剂。与基于钙调磷酸酶抑制剂的标准方案相比,基于btc的方案与肾功能改善相关。
Efficacy and Safety of Belatacept in Heart Transplant Recipients.
Background: Contemporary immunosuppressive regimens following heart transplantation (HT) are associated with nephrotoxicity. Additionally, some patients develop rejection despite standard immunosuppression, requiring augmentation. Belatacept (BTC) has demonstrated mortality and graft survival benefits while preserving renal function in kidney transplant recipients, but data regarding HT remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the utilization, safety, and efficacy of BTC-based therapy in HT recipients, comparing outcomes with patients managed under a standard immunosuppression protocol.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center study evaluated all adult HT recipients treated with BTC between October 2019 and August 2023. Patients were stratified by indication (renal-sparing or enhanced immunosuppression) and propensity-matched to controls receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy. Primary outcomes were survival free from clinically significant rejection and changes in renal function post-BTC initiation.
Results: BTC was started in 64 patients at a median of 20 [IQR 7-66] months following transplant (37 renal-sparing, 27 immunological). Median age was 51 years and 59% were male. Over a median follow-up of 26 months, rejection free survival was similar between BTC patients and controls (p=0.44). BTC initiation led to improved renal function, with increase in GFR from 38 to 43 ml/min/1.73m² (p=0.04). Infections occurred in 20% of BTC patients. EBV viremia occurred more frequently post-BTC initiation than before (40.6% vs. 7.8%, p<0.001). BTC treatment was associated with 98.5% 2-year survival.
Conclusions: BTC may safely be used as an adjunct immunosuppressive agent in HT recipients with renal dysfunction or elevated immunological risk. A BTC-based regimen is associated with improved renal function compared to a standard regimen based on calcineurin inhibitors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.