Cole McGrath, Christina Koenig, Hanna F Roenfanz, Yuwei Shen, David P Nicolau, Joseph L Kuti
{"title":"一个体外模型,以确定持续肾脏替代治疗期间抗菌素的跨膜清除。","authors":"Cole McGrath, Christina Koenig, Hanna F Roenfanz, Yuwei Shen, David P Nicolau, Joseph L Kuti","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extracorporeal removal of antibiotics in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be impacted by both individual drug properties as well as factors related to the dialysis prescription. Herein, we describe the detailed methodology for setting up an ex vivo CRRT model to determine the adsorption and transmembrane clearance (CLTM) of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin across various haemofilters, modes and effluent flow rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two methods to determine CLTM were evaluated to derive optimal dosing regimens and method development: CLSC/SA was calculated by the sieving coefficient (SC) for continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and saturation coefficient (SA) for continuous veno-venous haemodialysis. An alternative calculation CLNCM, was derived from non-compartmental analysis of concentrations from the central reservoir.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average SC/SA of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin were 1.01, 1.04, 0.87 and <0.01, respectively, which was concordant with their protein-binding profiles. Effluent rate was the primary driver of CLTM for all drugs except micafungin and could be used to guide proposed dosing regimens. CLSC/SA and CLNCM resulted in similar values for cefepime, meropenem and levofloxacin across the effluent rate range but were discordant for micafungin due to filter adsorption; thereby suggesting both methods could be utilized to evaluate CLTM provided negligible filter adsorption is observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These ex vivo methods can be combined with patient pharmacokinetic data to determine optimal drug dosing regimens for CRRT during new drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2109-2116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ex vivo model to determine transmembrane clearance of antimicrobials during continuous renal replacement therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Cole McGrath, Christina Koenig, Hanna F Roenfanz, Yuwei Shen, David P Nicolau, Joseph L Kuti\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extracorporeal removal of antibiotics in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be impacted by both individual drug properties as well as factors related to the dialysis prescription. Herein, we describe the detailed methodology for setting up an ex vivo CRRT model to determine the adsorption and transmembrane clearance (CLTM) of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin across various haemofilters, modes and effluent flow rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two methods to determine CLTM were evaluated to derive optimal dosing regimens and method development: CLSC/SA was calculated by the sieving coefficient (SC) for continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and saturation coefficient (SA) for continuous veno-venous haemodialysis. An alternative calculation CLNCM, was derived from non-compartmental analysis of concentrations from the central reservoir.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average SC/SA of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin were 1.01, 1.04, 0.87 and <0.01, respectively, which was concordant with their protein-binding profiles. Effluent rate was the primary driver of CLTM for all drugs except micafungin and could be used to guide proposed dosing regimens. CLSC/SA and CLNCM resulted in similar values for cefepime, meropenem and levofloxacin across the effluent rate range but were discordant for micafungin due to filter adsorption; thereby suggesting both methods could be utilized to evaluate CLTM provided negligible filter adsorption is observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These ex vivo methods can be combined with patient pharmacokinetic data to determine optimal drug dosing regimens for CRRT during new drug development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2109-2116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf177\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An ex vivo model to determine transmembrane clearance of antimicrobials during continuous renal replacement therapy.
Background: The extracorporeal removal of antibiotics in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be impacted by both individual drug properties as well as factors related to the dialysis prescription. Herein, we describe the detailed methodology for setting up an ex vivo CRRT model to determine the adsorption and transmembrane clearance (CLTM) of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin across various haemofilters, modes and effluent flow rates.
Methods: Two methods to determine CLTM were evaluated to derive optimal dosing regimens and method development: CLSC/SA was calculated by the sieving coefficient (SC) for continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and saturation coefficient (SA) for continuous veno-venous haemodialysis. An alternative calculation CLNCM, was derived from non-compartmental analysis of concentrations from the central reservoir.
Results: The average SC/SA of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin were 1.01, 1.04, 0.87 and <0.01, respectively, which was concordant with their protein-binding profiles. Effluent rate was the primary driver of CLTM for all drugs except micafungin and could be used to guide proposed dosing regimens. CLSC/SA and CLNCM resulted in similar values for cefepime, meropenem and levofloxacin across the effluent rate range but were discordant for micafungin due to filter adsorption; thereby suggesting both methods could be utilized to evaluate CLTM provided negligible filter adsorption is observed.
Conclusions: These ex vivo methods can be combined with patient pharmacokinetic data to determine optimal drug dosing regimens for CRRT during new drug development.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.