一个体外模型,以确定持续肾脏替代治疗期间抗菌素的跨膜清除。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Cole McGrath, Christina Koenig, Hanna F Roenfanz, Yuwei Shen, David P Nicolau, Joseph L Kuti
{"title":"一个体外模型,以确定持续肾脏替代治疗期间抗菌素的跨膜清除。","authors":"Cole McGrath, Christina Koenig, Hanna F Roenfanz, Yuwei Shen, David P Nicolau, Joseph L Kuti","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extracorporeal removal of antibiotics in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be impacted by both individual drug properties as well as factors related to the dialysis prescription. Herein, we describe the detailed methodology for setting up an ex vivo CRRT model to determine the adsorption and transmembrane clearance (CLTM) of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin across various haemofilters, modes and effluent flow rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two methods to determine CLTM were evaluated to derive optimal dosing regimens and method development: CLSC/SA was calculated by the sieving coefficient (SC) for continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and saturation coefficient (SA) for continuous veno-venous haemodialysis. An alternative calculation CLNCM, was derived from non-compartmental analysis of concentrations from the central reservoir.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average SC/SA of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin were 1.01, 1.04, 0.87 and <0.01, respectively, which was concordant with their protein-binding profiles. Effluent rate was the primary driver of CLTM for all drugs except micafungin and could be used to guide proposed dosing regimens. CLSC/SA and CLNCM resulted in similar values for cefepime, meropenem and levofloxacin across the effluent rate range but were discordant for micafungin due to filter adsorption; thereby suggesting both methods could be utilized to evaluate CLTM provided negligible filter adsorption is observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These ex vivo methods can be combined with patient pharmacokinetic data to determine optimal drug dosing regimens for CRRT during new drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2109-2116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ex vivo model to determine transmembrane clearance of antimicrobials during continuous renal replacement therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Cole McGrath, Christina Koenig, Hanna F Roenfanz, Yuwei Shen, David P Nicolau, Joseph L Kuti\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extracorporeal removal of antibiotics in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be impacted by both individual drug properties as well as factors related to the dialysis prescription. Herein, we describe the detailed methodology for setting up an ex vivo CRRT model to determine the adsorption and transmembrane clearance (CLTM) of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin across various haemofilters, modes and effluent flow rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two methods to determine CLTM were evaluated to derive optimal dosing regimens and method development: CLSC/SA was calculated by the sieving coefficient (SC) for continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and saturation coefficient (SA) for continuous veno-venous haemodialysis. An alternative calculation CLNCM, was derived from non-compartmental analysis of concentrations from the central reservoir.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average SC/SA of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin were 1.01, 1.04, 0.87 and <0.01, respectively, which was concordant with their protein-binding profiles. Effluent rate was the primary driver of CLTM for all drugs except micafungin and could be used to guide proposed dosing regimens. CLSC/SA and CLNCM resulted in similar values for cefepime, meropenem and levofloxacin across the effluent rate range but were discordant for micafungin due to filter adsorption; thereby suggesting both methods could be utilized to evaluate CLTM provided negligible filter adsorption is observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These ex vivo methods can be combined with patient pharmacokinetic data to determine optimal drug dosing regimens for CRRT during new drug development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2109-2116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf177\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:需要持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)的患者体外清除抗生素可能受到个体药物特性以及透析处方相关因素的影响。在此,我们详细描述了建立体外CRRT模型的方法,以确定头孢吡肟、美罗培南、左氧氟沙星和米卡芬净在不同血液过滤器、模式和流出流量中的吸附和跨膜清除(CLTM)。方法:对两种测定CLTM的方法进行评估,得出最佳给药方案和方法发展:CLSC/SA采用连续静脉-静脉血液过滤的筛分系数(SC)和连续静脉-静脉血液透析的饱和系数(SA)计算。另一种计算方法CLNCM,来源于对中央水库浓度的非区隔分析。结果:头孢吡肟、美罗培南、左氧氟沙星和米卡芬星的SC/SA平均值分别为1.01、1.04和0.87。结论:这些体外方法可结合患者药代动力学数据,确定新药开发过程中CRRT的最佳给药方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ex vivo model to determine transmembrane clearance of antimicrobials during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Background: The extracorporeal removal of antibiotics in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be impacted by both individual drug properties as well as factors related to the dialysis prescription. Herein, we describe the detailed methodology for setting up an ex vivo CRRT model to determine the adsorption and transmembrane clearance (CLTM) of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin across various haemofilters, modes and effluent flow rates.

Methods: Two methods to determine CLTM were evaluated to derive optimal dosing regimens and method development: CLSC/SA was calculated by the sieving coefficient (SC) for continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and saturation coefficient (SA) for continuous veno-venous haemodialysis. An alternative calculation CLNCM, was derived from non-compartmental analysis of concentrations from the central reservoir.

Results: The average SC/SA of cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin and micafungin were 1.01, 1.04, 0.87 and <0.01, respectively, which was concordant with their protein-binding profiles. Effluent rate was the primary driver of CLTM for all drugs except micafungin and could be used to guide proposed dosing regimens. CLSC/SA and CLNCM resulted in similar values for cefepime, meropenem and levofloxacin across the effluent rate range but were discordant for micafungin due to filter adsorption; thereby suggesting both methods could be utilized to evaluate CLTM provided negligible filter adsorption is observed.

Conclusions: These ex vivo methods can be combined with patient pharmacokinetic data to determine optimal drug dosing regimens for CRRT during new drug development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信