臂位对低剂量双源CT一步主动脉、脑颈动脉造影图像质量及辐射剂量的影响。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Meng Wang, Chao Zheng, Lin Yang, Juan Su, Jiexin Sheng, Xiaolong He, Bo Wang, GuangHang Wu
{"title":"臂位对低剂量双源CT一步主动脉、脑颈动脉造影图像质量及辐射剂量的影响。","authors":"Meng Wang, Chao Zheng, Lin Yang, Juan Su, Jiexin Sheng, Xiaolong He, Bo Wang, GuangHang Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01742-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA is useful for diagnosing and treating type A aortic dissection, the radiation dose is increased due to the wider scanning range. The impact of varying arm positions on radiation dose and image quality is unknown when optimizing the scan protocol. This study aims to determine the best scanning protocol to minimize radiation dose while maintaining image quality, as well as how arm position impacts radiation dose and image quality of low dose one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2022 and August 2023,a total of 185 patients were enrolled in the study and underwent low-dose one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA. Two groups were randomly assigned to the patients: Rising arm group (group A) and drooping arm group (group B). Two radiologists assessed the subjective image quality using a 5-point scale, and kappa test was performed to evaluate the consistency between observers. Regions of interest (ROI) were set up in target vessels, and the objective image quality was evaluated by attenuation, noise, signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). Tube current, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) and the effective radiation dose (E) were compared between the two groups. The comparison was performed using t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjective image quality of group B was significantly higher than group A (p < 0.05), and the patient characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The consistency between observers (κ = 0.84 for group A and κ = 0.89 for group B) were excellent. Group B showed lower overall noise level, higher SNR, CNR, and higher vascular attenuation level than group A. Furthermore, group B showed reduced DLP, E, tube current, and CTDIvol, and higher aortic noise and decreased cerebral and carotid vascular noise (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose dual-source one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA radiation dose can be minimized and image quality can be improved by positioning both arms on the body side.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of arm position on low dose dual-source CT one-step aortic and cerebral-carotid artery angiography image quality and radiation dose.\",\"authors\":\"Meng Wang, Chao Zheng, Lin Yang, Juan Su, Jiexin Sheng, Xiaolong He, Bo Wang, GuangHang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-025-01742-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA is useful for diagnosing and treating type A aortic dissection, the radiation dose is increased due to the wider scanning range. The impact of varying arm positions on radiation dose and image quality is unknown when optimizing the scan protocol. This study aims to determine the best scanning protocol to minimize radiation dose while maintaining image quality, as well as how arm position impacts radiation dose and image quality of low dose one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2022 and August 2023,a total of 185 patients were enrolled in the study and underwent low-dose one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA. Two groups were randomly assigned to the patients: Rising arm group (group A) and drooping arm group (group B). Two radiologists assessed the subjective image quality using a 5-point scale, and kappa test was performed to evaluate the consistency between observers. Regions of interest (ROI) were set up in target vessels, and the objective image quality was evaluated by attenuation, noise, signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). Tube current, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) and the effective radiation dose (E) were compared between the two groups. The comparison was performed using t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjective image quality of group B was significantly higher than group A (p < 0.05), and the patient characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The consistency between observers (κ = 0.84 for group A and κ = 0.89 for group B) were excellent. Group B showed lower overall noise level, higher SNR, CNR, and higher vascular attenuation level than group A. Furthermore, group B showed reduced DLP, E, tube current, and CTDIvol, and higher aortic noise and decreased cerebral and carotid vascular noise (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose dual-source one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA radiation dose can be minimized and image quality can be improved by positioning both arms on the body side.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01742-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01742-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一站式脑颈主动脉CTA虽然对诊断和治疗A型主动脉夹层有用,但由于扫描范围较宽,辐射剂量增加。在优化扫描方案时,不同手臂位置对辐射剂量和图像质量的影响是未知的。本研究旨在确定在保持图像质量的同时最大限度降低辐射剂量的最佳扫描方案,以及手臂位置如何影响低剂量一站式脑颈主动脉CTA的辐射剂量和图像质量。方法:在2022年1月至2023年8月期间,共有185名患者入组,并接受了低剂量的一站式脑颈动脉CTA。将患者随机分为两组:上升臂组(A组)和下垂臂组(B组)。两名放射科医师采用5分制评估主观图像质量,并采用卡帕检验评估观察者之间的一致性。在目标血管中建立感兴趣区域(ROI),并通过衰减、噪声、信噪比(SNR)和噪比(CNR)评价客观图像质量。比较两组患者的管电流、体积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度积(DLP)和有效辐射剂量(E)。比较采用t检验。结果:B组患者主观图像质量显著高于A组(p < 0.05)。观察者之间的一致性极好(A组κ = 0.84, B组κ = 0.89)。B组总体噪声水平较a组低,信噪比、CNR、血管衰减水平较a组高,DLP、E、管电流、CTDIvol均较B组低,主动脉噪声较高,脑颈动脉血管噪声降低(均p)结论:双臂侧位可降低低剂量双源一站式脑颈主动脉CTA辐射剂量,提高图像质量。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of arm position on low dose dual-source CT one-step aortic and cerebral-carotid artery angiography image quality and radiation dose.

Background: Although one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA is useful for diagnosing and treating type A aortic dissection, the radiation dose is increased due to the wider scanning range. The impact of varying arm positions on radiation dose and image quality is unknown when optimizing the scan protocol. This study aims to determine the best scanning protocol to minimize radiation dose while maintaining image quality, as well as how arm position impacts radiation dose and image quality of low dose one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA.

Methods: Between January 2022 and August 2023,a total of 185 patients were enrolled in the study and underwent low-dose one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA. Two groups were randomly assigned to the patients: Rising arm group (group A) and drooping arm group (group B). Two radiologists assessed the subjective image quality using a 5-point scale, and kappa test was performed to evaluate the consistency between observers. Regions of interest (ROI) were set up in target vessels, and the objective image quality was evaluated by attenuation, noise, signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). Tube current, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) and the effective radiation dose (E) were compared between the two groups. The comparison was performed using t test.

Results: Subjective image quality of group B was significantly higher than group A (p < 0.05), and the patient characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The consistency between observers (κ = 0.84 for group A and κ = 0.89 for group B) were excellent. Group B showed lower overall noise level, higher SNR, CNR, and higher vascular attenuation level than group A. Furthermore, group B showed reduced DLP, E, tube current, and CTDIvol, and higher aortic noise and decreased cerebral and carotid vascular noise (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Low-dose dual-source one-stop cerebral carotid aortic CTA radiation dose can be minimized and image quality can be improved by positioning both arms on the body side.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信