一项比较股骨近端髓内钉与股骨近端髓内钉反旋转治疗不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折疗效的随机试验。

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of African Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI:10.4103/aam.aam_144_24
Vinay Prabhat, Thanchuingam Jingua, Govind Kumar Gupta, Rohit Topno, Sabyasachi Kundu, Abhishek Guria
{"title":"一项比较股骨近端髓内钉与股骨近端髓内钉反旋转治疗不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折疗效的随机试验。","authors":"Vinay Prabhat, Thanchuingam Jingua, Govind Kumar Gupta, Rohit Topno, Sabyasachi Kundu, Abhishek Guria","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_144_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) and Proximal Femoral Nailing Anti-rotation (PFNA 2) are both intra-medullary implants having 6 degrees of proximal valgus angulation. The helical blade compact the cancellous bone in femoral head when it is driven inside.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The aim of our study is to compare radiological and functional outcome and superiority over other in management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture by PFN and PFNA 2.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 which included 76 patients of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In PFN group, Harris hip score was Excellent in 23 cases (60.52%), Good in 12 cases (31.57%), Fair in 2 cases (5.26%) and poor in1 case (2.63%). In PFNA 2 group, Harris hip score was excellent in 24cases (63.15%), Good in13 cases (34.21 %), Fair in 1 case (2.63%) and Poor in none of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFNA 2 significantly reduces the operative time and blood loss compared to PFN. However Both PFN and PFNA 2 implants offers no statistically significant advantages over each other in terms of fracture unions, functional and radiological outcomes, post-operative complications and recovery outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"621-627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Trial Comparing the Outcome of Proximal Femoral Nailing and Proximal Femoral Nailing Antirotation 2 for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Prabhat, Thanchuingam Jingua, Govind Kumar Gupta, Rohit Topno, Sabyasachi Kundu, Abhishek Guria\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aam.aam_144_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) and Proximal Femoral Nailing Anti-rotation (PFNA 2) are both intra-medullary implants having 6 degrees of proximal valgus angulation. The helical blade compact the cancellous bone in femoral head when it is driven inside.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The aim of our study is to compare radiological and functional outcome and superiority over other in management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture by PFN and PFNA 2.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 which included 76 patients of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In PFN group, Harris hip score was Excellent in 23 cases (60.52%), Good in 12 cases (31.57%), Fair in 2 cases (5.26%) and poor in1 case (2.63%). In PFNA 2 group, Harris hip score was excellent in 24cases (63.15%), Good in13 cases (34.21 %), Fair in 1 case (2.63%) and Poor in none of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFNA 2 significantly reduces the operative time and blood loss compared to PFN. However Both PFN and PFNA 2 implants offers no statistically significant advantages over each other in terms of fracture unions, functional and radiological outcomes, post-operative complications and recovery outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of African Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"621-627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of African Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_144_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_144_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近端股骨内钉(PFN)和近端股骨内钉抗旋转(PFNA 2)均为近端外翻角度为6度的髓内种植体。螺旋刀片将股骨头内的松质骨压紧。目的和目的:我们研究的目的是比较PFN和PFNA 2治疗不稳定转子间骨折的放射学和功能结果及其优越性。材料与方法:研究于2021年10月至2022年9月进行,纳入76例不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者。结果:PFN组Harris髋关节评分优23例(60.52%),良12例(31.57%),一般2例(5.26%),差1例(2.63%)。PFNA 2组Harris髋关节评分优24例(63.15%),良13例(34.21%),一般1例(2.63%),无差。结论:与PFN相比,PFNA 2可显著减少手术时间和出血量。然而,在骨折愈合、功能和放射预后、术后并发症和恢复结果方面,PFN和PFNA 2植入物没有统计学上的显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Outcome of Proximal Femoral Nailing and Proximal Femoral Nailing Antirotation 2 for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture.

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Outcome of Proximal Femoral Nailing and Proximal Femoral Nailing Antirotation 2 for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture.

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Outcome of Proximal Femoral Nailing and Proximal Femoral Nailing Antirotation 2 for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture.

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Outcome of Proximal Femoral Nailing and Proximal Femoral Nailing Antirotation 2 for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture.

Background: Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) and Proximal Femoral Nailing Anti-rotation (PFNA 2) are both intra-medullary implants having 6 degrees of proximal valgus angulation. The helical blade compact the cancellous bone in femoral head when it is driven inside.

Aims and objectives: The aim of our study is to compare radiological and functional outcome and superiority over other in management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture by PFN and PFNA 2.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 which included 76 patients of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur.

Results: In PFN group, Harris hip score was Excellent in 23 cases (60.52%), Good in 12 cases (31.57%), Fair in 2 cases (5.26%) and poor in1 case (2.63%). In PFNA 2 group, Harris hip score was excellent in 24cases (63.15%), Good in13 cases (34.21 %), Fair in 1 case (2.63%) and Poor in none of the cases.

Conclusion: PFNA 2 significantly reduces the operative time and blood loss compared to PFN. However Both PFN and PFNA 2 implants offers no statistically significant advantages over each other in terms of fracture unions, functional and radiological outcomes, post-operative complications and recovery outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信