西班牙眼科医生对青光眼过度诊断和过度治疗的看法调查

Q3 Medicine
J. González-Martín-Moro , N. Ventura-Abreu , J. Zarallo-Gallardo , F.J. Muñoz-Negrete
{"title":"西班牙眼科医生对青光眼过度诊断和过度治疗的看法调查","authors":"J. González-Martín-Moro ,&nbsp;N. Ventura-Abreu ,&nbsp;J. Zarallo-Gallardo ,&nbsp;F.J. Muñoz-Negrete","doi":"10.1016/j.oftal.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the perception and knowledge Spanish ophthalmologists have of overdiagnosis (OD) and overtreatment (OT) in the field of glaucoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous, 26-item online survey was submitted to members of the Spanish Glaucoma Society and the Spanish Ophthalmology Society.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 55% out of the 195 respondents were aware of the current definition of OD/OT. Only 13 (6.7%) believe OD/OT is not a clinically significant problem. There were no significant differences in terms of demographics, type of practice and treatment preferences between ophthalmologists who considered OD/OT important and those who considerd OD/OT unimportant, except for a higher proportion of PhDs among the “not clinically relevant” group. No differences were found either across groups considering clinical findings/real-world scenarios. “Peace of mind” was considered a principal driver of OD/OT by both groups. Moderate OHT was considered the most common clinical scenario for OD/OT, which was estimated to affect 20% of medically treated patients and only 5% of those undergoing surgical procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spanish ophthalmologists reported being aware of the importance of OD and OT. However, only half were aware of the current definition of OD and OT. Most participants believe a White Paper should be produced to reduce the prevalence of OD/OT. The low participation rate and the non-response bias may limit the generalization of the results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8348,"journal":{"name":"Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De Oftalmologia","volume":"100 6","pages":"Pages 320-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encuesta sobre la percepción que los oftalmólogos españoles tienen del sobrediagnóstico y sobretratamiento en glaucoma\",\"authors\":\"J. González-Martín-Moro ,&nbsp;N. Ventura-Abreu ,&nbsp;J. Zarallo-Gallardo ,&nbsp;F.J. Muñoz-Negrete\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oftal.2024.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the perception and knowledge Spanish ophthalmologists have of overdiagnosis (OD) and overtreatment (OT) in the field of glaucoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous, 26-item online survey was submitted to members of the Spanish Glaucoma Society and the Spanish Ophthalmology Society.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 55% out of the 195 respondents were aware of the current definition of OD/OT. Only 13 (6.7%) believe OD/OT is not a clinically significant problem. There were no significant differences in terms of demographics, type of practice and treatment preferences between ophthalmologists who considered OD/OT important and those who considerd OD/OT unimportant, except for a higher proportion of PhDs among the “not clinically relevant” group. No differences were found either across groups considering clinical findings/real-world scenarios. “Peace of mind” was considered a principal driver of OD/OT by both groups. Moderate OHT was considered the most common clinical scenario for OD/OT, which was estimated to affect 20% of medically treated patients and only 5% of those undergoing surgical procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spanish ophthalmologists reported being aware of the importance of OD and OT. However, only half were aware of the current definition of OD and OT. Most participants believe a White Paper should be produced to reduce the prevalence of OD/OT. The low participation rate and the non-response bias may limit the generalization of the results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De Oftalmologia\",\"volume\":\"100 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 320-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De Oftalmologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0365669125000577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De Oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0365669125000577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解西班牙眼科医生对青光眼的过度诊断(OD)和过度治疗(OT)的认知和认识。方法对西班牙青光眼学会和西班牙眼科学会会员进行26项匿名在线调查。结果在195名受访者中,有55%的人知道当前OD/OT的定义。只有13人(6.7%)认为OD/OT不是临床显著问题。认为OD/OT重要的眼科医生和认为OD/OT不重要的眼科医生在人口统计学、执业类型和治疗偏好方面没有显著差异,除了“与临床无关”的组中博士比例更高。考虑到临床结果/真实情况,各组间均未发现差异。两组人都认为“心态平和”是OD/OT的主要驱动因素。中度OHT被认为是OD/OT最常见的临床情况,估计影响20%的内科治疗患者和5%的外科手术患者。结论西班牙眼科医生已经意识到OD和OT的重要性。然而,只有一半的人知道OD和OT的现行定义。大多数与会者认为,应编写一份白皮书,以减少吸毒过量/超时工作的流行。低参与率和无反应偏差可能限制了结果的推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Encuesta sobre la percepción que los oftalmólogos españoles tienen del sobrediagnóstico y sobretratamiento en glaucoma

Purpose

To assess the perception and knowledge Spanish ophthalmologists have of overdiagnosis (OD) and overtreatment (OT) in the field of glaucoma.

Methods

An anonymous, 26-item online survey was submitted to members of the Spanish Glaucoma Society and the Spanish Ophthalmology Society.

Results

A total of 55% out of the 195 respondents were aware of the current definition of OD/OT. Only 13 (6.7%) believe OD/OT is not a clinically significant problem. There were no significant differences in terms of demographics, type of practice and treatment preferences between ophthalmologists who considered OD/OT important and those who considerd OD/OT unimportant, except for a higher proportion of PhDs among the “not clinically relevant” group. No differences were found either across groups considering clinical findings/real-world scenarios. “Peace of mind” was considered a principal driver of OD/OT by both groups. Moderate OHT was considered the most common clinical scenario for OD/OT, which was estimated to affect 20% of medically treated patients and only 5% of those undergoing surgical procedures.

Conclusions

Spanish ophthalmologists reported being aware of the importance of OD and OT. However, only half were aware of the current definition of OD and OT. Most participants believe a White Paper should be produced to reduce the prevalence of OD/OT. The low participation rate and the non-response bias may limit the generalization of the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: La revista Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, editada mensualmente por la propia Sociedad, tiene como objetivo publicar trabajos de investigación básica y clínica como artículos originales; casos clínicos, innovaciones técnicas y correlaciones clinicopatológicas en forma de comunicaciones cortas; editoriales; revisiones; cartas al editor; comentarios de libros; información de eventos; noticias personales y anuncios comerciales, así como trabajos de temas históricos y motivos inconográficos relacionados con la Oftalmología. El título abreviado es Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, y debe ser utilizado en bibliografías, notas a pie de página y referencias bibliográficas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信