“谁与谁相交”:管理印尼哥龙塔洛省工业采矿和ASGM之间有争议的界面的竞争理性

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bernadetta Devi , Robyn Mayes , Deanna Grant-Smith
{"title":"“谁与谁相交”:管理印尼哥龙塔洛省工业采矿和ASGM之间有争议的界面的竞争理性","authors":"Bernadetta Devi ,&nbsp;Robyn Mayes ,&nbsp;Deanna Grant-Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The interface between industrial mining and artisanal small-scale mining (ASM) operations has increased globally due to simultaneous localized intensifications of both types of mining operations. The ensuing multiple interactions of entities and systems of industrial mining and ASM often result in conflict with significant material ramifications, usually to the detriment of ASM miners and communities. This paper investigates the contested interface at the point of industrial mining’s transition from exploration to production at two mine sites in Indonesia: namely, Suwawa Timur, in Bone-Bolango Regency and Gunung Pani, in Pohuwato Regency in Gorontalo Province. Specifically, these mining operations were in the environmental impact assessment and community consultation phase. Our investigation draws on in-depth interviews with miners involved in local artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) and ASM associations, representatives of gold/copper mining companies seeking to transition from exploration to production, associated government entities, and communities near these two mining locations. Our analysis demonstrates the contestation of the interface through focusing on the question of ‘who intersects with whom?’—as raised by both mining companies and ASGM actors. Using a combined lens of governmentality and interpretive governance, this paper argues that governing the interface involves the exercise of power/knowledge of multiple actors through the promotion of competing rationalities, making the interface relations dynamic and positional. In concluding, we advocate for the active and legitimate involvement of ASM actors in governing the interface.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Who intersects with whom’: Competing rationalities in governing the contested interface between industrial mining and ASGM in Gorontalo Province, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Bernadetta Devi ,&nbsp;Robyn Mayes ,&nbsp;Deanna Grant-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The interface between industrial mining and artisanal small-scale mining (ASM) operations has increased globally due to simultaneous localized intensifications of both types of mining operations. The ensuing multiple interactions of entities and systems of industrial mining and ASM often result in conflict with significant material ramifications, usually to the detriment of ASM miners and communities. This paper investigates the contested interface at the point of industrial mining’s transition from exploration to production at two mine sites in Indonesia: namely, Suwawa Timur, in Bone-Bolango Regency and Gunung Pani, in Pohuwato Regency in Gorontalo Province. Specifically, these mining operations were in the environmental impact assessment and community consultation phase. Our investigation draws on in-depth interviews with miners involved in local artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) and ASM associations, representatives of gold/copper mining companies seeking to transition from exploration to production, associated government entities, and communities near these two mining locations. Our analysis demonstrates the contestation of the interface through focusing on the question of ‘who intersects with whom?’—as raised by both mining companies and ASGM actors. Using a combined lens of governmentality and interpretive governance, this paper argues that governing the interface involves the exercise of power/knowledge of multiple actors through the promotion of competing rationalities, making the interface relations dynamic and positional. In concluding, we advocate for the active and legitimate involvement of ASM actors in governing the interface.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000802\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工业采矿和手工小规模采矿作业之间的联系在全球范围内增加了,因为这两种采矿作业同时在局部加强。随后,工业采矿和ASM的实体和系统之间的多重相互作用经常导致具有重大重大后果的冲突,通常会损害ASM矿工和社区。本文调查了印度尼西亚两个矿区工业采矿从勘探到生产过渡时的争议界面:即位于Bone-Bolango Regency的Suwawa Timur和位于Gorontalo省Pohuwato Regency的Gunung Pani。具体来说,这些采矿作业正处于环境影响评估和社区协商阶段。我们的调查深入采访了当地手工和小规模金矿开采(ASGM)和ASM协会的矿工、寻求从勘探向生产过渡的金/铜矿业公司的代表、相关政府机构以及这两个矿区附近的社区。我们的分析通过关注“谁与谁相交”的问题来展示界面的争论。——矿业公司和ASGM参与者都提出了这个问题。本文从治理学和解释性治理的视角出发,认为界面治理涉及多方主体通过促进竞争理性来行使权力/知识,从而使界面关系具有动态性和位置性。总之,我们提倡ASM参与者积极和合法地参与管理接口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Who intersects with whom’: Competing rationalities in governing the contested interface between industrial mining and ASGM in Gorontalo Province, Indonesia
The interface between industrial mining and artisanal small-scale mining (ASM) operations has increased globally due to simultaneous localized intensifications of both types of mining operations. The ensuing multiple interactions of entities and systems of industrial mining and ASM often result in conflict with significant material ramifications, usually to the detriment of ASM miners and communities. This paper investigates the contested interface at the point of industrial mining’s transition from exploration to production at two mine sites in Indonesia: namely, Suwawa Timur, in Bone-Bolango Regency and Gunung Pani, in Pohuwato Regency in Gorontalo Province. Specifically, these mining operations were in the environmental impact assessment and community consultation phase. Our investigation draws on in-depth interviews with miners involved in local artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) and ASM associations, representatives of gold/copper mining companies seeking to transition from exploration to production, associated government entities, and communities near these two mining locations. Our analysis demonstrates the contestation of the interface through focusing on the question of ‘who intersects with whom?’—as raised by both mining companies and ASGM actors. Using a combined lens of governmentality and interpretive governance, this paper argues that governing the interface involves the exercise of power/knowledge of multiple actors through the promotion of competing rationalities, making the interface relations dynamic and positional. In concluding, we advocate for the active and legitimate involvement of ASM actors in governing the interface.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信