Jiatao Zhang , Mai-He Li , Josep Penuelas , Jordi Sardans , Lan Du , Zuoqiang Yuan , Yonghong Luo , Yan Shen , Ru Tian , Na Li , Jinbao Zhang , Xinguo Han , Mohsin Mahmood , Haiyan Ren , Zhuwen Xu
{"title":"不同干旱条件下叶面积对羊草叶绿素荧光的调节作用","authors":"Jiatao Zhang , Mai-He Li , Josep Penuelas , Jordi Sardans , Lan Du , Zuoqiang Yuan , Yonghong Luo , Yan Shen , Ru Tian , Na Li , Jinbao Zhang , Xinguo Han , Mohsin Mahmood , Haiyan Ren , Zhuwen Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.envexpbot.2025.106175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The photosynthetic response of plants to drought has been widely explored, primarily through indoor cultivation or short-term physiological monitoring. However, studies linking the photosynthesis of forage with plant traits and production under various drought conditions, especially in the context of global precipitation changes, are limited. We conducted a four-year field experiment involving different precipitation treatments: ambient precipitation, intense drought (ID, precipitation exclusion during June), chronic drought (CD, reducing half precipitation amount from June to August), and reducing half precipitation frequency from June to August (RF, precipitation redistribution without changing precipitation amount). Our results showed that ID and CD significantly decreased the actual maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) and maximum photochemical quantum yield (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>), indicating a decline in photosynthetic capacity in <em>Leymus chinensis</em>. Meanwhile, the increase in regulatory energy dissipation quantum yield (Φ(NPQ)) highlighted enhanced photoprotection. Additionally, the CD increased the non-regulatory energy dissipation quantum yield (Φ(NO)), indicating that the photoprotection mechanism was insufficient to dissipate excess excitation energy, leading to photodamage at the reaction center. In contrast, under the RF scenario, plants effectively managed excess excitation energy by increasing Φ(NPQ), which prevented damage and maintained stable ΦPSII and F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> levels. Through regulating leaf area, drought increased Φ(NO) and decreased F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>. Although this strategy mitigated further photosynthetic damage, it also reduced photosynthetic efficiency and productivity of <em>L. chinensis</em>. This study represents the first exploration of patterns and mechanisms of plant photosynthetic processes in response to diverse drought scenarios. It underscores the crucial role of key plant traits, i.e. leaf area, in regulating photosynthetic responses amid changing precipitation patterns, and provides valuable information for grassland management and continuous forage supply.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11758,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Experimental Botany","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 106175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leaf area modulates the chlorophyll fluorescence of Leymus chinensis in response to different drought scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Jiatao Zhang , Mai-He Li , Josep Penuelas , Jordi Sardans , Lan Du , Zuoqiang Yuan , Yonghong Luo , Yan Shen , Ru Tian , Na Li , Jinbao Zhang , Xinguo Han , Mohsin Mahmood , Haiyan Ren , Zhuwen Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envexpbot.2025.106175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The photosynthetic response of plants to drought has been widely explored, primarily through indoor cultivation or short-term physiological monitoring. However, studies linking the photosynthesis of forage with plant traits and production under various drought conditions, especially in the context of global precipitation changes, are limited. We conducted a four-year field experiment involving different precipitation treatments: ambient precipitation, intense drought (ID, precipitation exclusion during June), chronic drought (CD, reducing half precipitation amount from June to August), and reducing half precipitation frequency from June to August (RF, precipitation redistribution without changing precipitation amount). Our results showed that ID and CD significantly decreased the actual maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) and maximum photochemical quantum yield (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>), indicating a decline in photosynthetic capacity in <em>Leymus chinensis</em>. Meanwhile, the increase in regulatory energy dissipation quantum yield (Φ(NPQ)) highlighted enhanced photoprotection. Additionally, the CD increased the non-regulatory energy dissipation quantum yield (Φ(NO)), indicating that the photoprotection mechanism was insufficient to dissipate excess excitation energy, leading to photodamage at the reaction center. In contrast, under the RF scenario, plants effectively managed excess excitation energy by increasing Φ(NPQ), which prevented damage and maintained stable ΦPSII and F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> levels. Through regulating leaf area, drought increased Φ(NO) and decreased F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>. Although this strategy mitigated further photosynthetic damage, it also reduced photosynthetic efficiency and productivity of <em>L. chinensis</em>. This study represents the first exploration of patterns and mechanisms of plant photosynthetic processes in response to diverse drought scenarios. It underscores the crucial role of key plant traits, i.e. leaf area, in regulating photosynthetic responses amid changing precipitation patterns, and provides valuable information for grassland management and continuous forage supply.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Experimental Botany\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Experimental Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098847225000929\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098847225000929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Leaf area modulates the chlorophyll fluorescence of Leymus chinensis in response to different drought scenarios
The photosynthetic response of plants to drought has been widely explored, primarily through indoor cultivation or short-term physiological monitoring. However, studies linking the photosynthesis of forage with plant traits and production under various drought conditions, especially in the context of global precipitation changes, are limited. We conducted a four-year field experiment involving different precipitation treatments: ambient precipitation, intense drought (ID, precipitation exclusion during June), chronic drought (CD, reducing half precipitation amount from June to August), and reducing half precipitation frequency from June to August (RF, precipitation redistribution without changing precipitation amount). Our results showed that ID and CD significantly decreased the actual maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) and maximum photochemical quantum yield (Fv/Fm), indicating a decline in photosynthetic capacity in Leymus chinensis. Meanwhile, the increase in regulatory energy dissipation quantum yield (Φ(NPQ)) highlighted enhanced photoprotection. Additionally, the CD increased the non-regulatory energy dissipation quantum yield (Φ(NO)), indicating that the photoprotection mechanism was insufficient to dissipate excess excitation energy, leading to photodamage at the reaction center. In contrast, under the RF scenario, plants effectively managed excess excitation energy by increasing Φ(NPQ), which prevented damage and maintained stable ΦPSII and Fv/Fm levels. Through regulating leaf area, drought increased Φ(NO) and decreased Fv/Fm. Although this strategy mitigated further photosynthetic damage, it also reduced photosynthetic efficiency and productivity of L. chinensis. This study represents the first exploration of patterns and mechanisms of plant photosynthetic processes in response to diverse drought scenarios. It underscores the crucial role of key plant traits, i.e. leaf area, in regulating photosynthetic responses amid changing precipitation patterns, and provides valuable information for grassland management and continuous forage supply.
期刊介绍:
Environmental and Experimental Botany (EEB) publishes research papers on the physical, chemical, biological, molecular mechanisms and processes involved in the responses of plants to their environment.
In addition to research papers, the journal includes review articles. Submission is in agreement with the Editors-in-Chief.
The Journal also publishes special issues which are built by invited guest editors and are related to the main themes of EEB.
The areas covered by the Journal include:
(1) Responses of plants to heavy metals and pollutants
(2) Plant/water interactions (salinity, drought, flooding)
(3) Responses of plants to radiations ranging from UV-B to infrared
(4) Plant/atmosphere relations (ozone, CO2 , temperature)
(5) Global change impacts on plant ecophysiology
(6) Biotic interactions involving environmental factors.