Xin Jin , Xihao Huang , Dangdang Wang , Zhongmin Jin , Junyan Li
{"title":"不同临床操作下重建后交叉韧带的磨损及生物力学","authors":"Xin Jin , Xihao Huang , Dangdang Wang , Zhongmin Jin , Junyan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The killer turn and critical corner effects in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction techniques significantly influence graft abrasion and biomechanics. However, the mechanisms of graft failure under physiological loading, considering both killer turn and critical corner effects, have not been thoroughly investigated. 24 porcine knee specimens and 32 grafts were randomly assigned to three different PCL reconstruction techniques. The reconstructed knees underwent 300,000 cycles of gait loading using a knee simulator, followed by load-to-failure tests. Finite element (FE) models of PCL-reconstructed knees were developed to further evaluate the killer turn and critical corner effects on graft biomechanics, focusing on graft-to-bone tunnel contact. Reconstructed grafts using the transtibial technique with anatomic tibial tunnel (ATT: 530.5 N ± 176.3 N) and transtibial technique with a lower tibial tunnel (LTT: 564.3 N ± 249.2 N) demonstrate significantly lower maximum load compared to the tibial inlay technique (TI: 920.7 N ± 201.7 N) (P < 0.05) and the non-operated tissues (1077.8 N ± 127.6 N) (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between ATT and LTT grafts (P = 1.000) or between TI grafts and non-operated ones (P = 0.695). FE simulations suggest that the reduced strength of ATT grafts may result from increased contact pressure at the killer turn, while the reduced strength of LTT grafts may be attributed to the heightened windshield wiper effect at the critical corner, induced by the longer graft path. Graft failures in ATT commonly occurred at the killer turn, while LTT and TI grafts failed at the critical corner. The TI technique demonstrates superior abrasion resistance compared to both ATT and LTT techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 112769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abrasion and biomechanics of reconstructed posterior cruciate ligament under different clinical operations\",\"authors\":\"Xin Jin , Xihao Huang , Dangdang Wang , Zhongmin Jin , Junyan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The killer turn and critical corner effects in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction techniques significantly influence graft abrasion and biomechanics. However, the mechanisms of graft failure under physiological loading, considering both killer turn and critical corner effects, have not been thoroughly investigated. 24 porcine knee specimens and 32 grafts were randomly assigned to three different PCL reconstruction techniques. The reconstructed knees underwent 300,000 cycles of gait loading using a knee simulator, followed by load-to-failure tests. Finite element (FE) models of PCL-reconstructed knees were developed to further evaluate the killer turn and critical corner effects on graft biomechanics, focusing on graft-to-bone tunnel contact. Reconstructed grafts using the transtibial technique with anatomic tibial tunnel (ATT: 530.5 N ± 176.3 N) and transtibial technique with a lower tibial tunnel (LTT: 564.3 N ± 249.2 N) demonstrate significantly lower maximum load compared to the tibial inlay technique (TI: 920.7 N ± 201.7 N) (P < 0.05) and the non-operated tissues (1077.8 N ± 127.6 N) (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between ATT and LTT grafts (P = 1.000) or between TI grafts and non-operated ones (P = 0.695). FE simulations suggest that the reduced strength of ATT grafts may result from increased contact pressure at the killer turn, while the reduced strength of LTT grafts may be attributed to the heightened windshield wiper effect at the critical corner, induced by the longer graft path. Graft failures in ATT commonly occurred at the killer turn, while LTT and TI grafts failed at the critical corner. The TI technique demonstrates superior abrasion resistance compared to both ATT and LTT techniques.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025002817\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025002817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abrasion and biomechanics of reconstructed posterior cruciate ligament under different clinical operations
The killer turn and critical corner effects in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction techniques significantly influence graft abrasion and biomechanics. However, the mechanisms of graft failure under physiological loading, considering both killer turn and critical corner effects, have not been thoroughly investigated. 24 porcine knee specimens and 32 grafts were randomly assigned to three different PCL reconstruction techniques. The reconstructed knees underwent 300,000 cycles of gait loading using a knee simulator, followed by load-to-failure tests. Finite element (FE) models of PCL-reconstructed knees were developed to further evaluate the killer turn and critical corner effects on graft biomechanics, focusing on graft-to-bone tunnel contact. Reconstructed grafts using the transtibial technique with anatomic tibial tunnel (ATT: 530.5 N ± 176.3 N) and transtibial technique with a lower tibial tunnel (LTT: 564.3 N ± 249.2 N) demonstrate significantly lower maximum load compared to the tibial inlay technique (TI: 920.7 N ± 201.7 N) (P < 0.05) and the non-operated tissues (1077.8 N ± 127.6 N) (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between ATT and LTT grafts (P = 1.000) or between TI grafts and non-operated ones (P = 0.695). FE simulations suggest that the reduced strength of ATT grafts may result from increased contact pressure at the killer turn, while the reduced strength of LTT grafts may be attributed to the heightened windshield wiper effect at the critical corner, induced by the longer graft path. Graft failures in ATT commonly occurred at the killer turn, while LTT and TI grafts failed at the critical corner. The TI technique demonstrates superior abrasion resistance compared to both ATT and LTT techniques.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.